On 10/01/2022 11:28, Marco Martin wrote:
> as said in the meeting notes, there is a request from Opensuse and Kubuntu to
> do a new Plasma LTS release.
> Optimal for them would be 5.24, but a potential problem is that is a quite
> feature heavy release, so it may be too buggy for an lts.
>
>
Can I suggest Plasma people attend the frameworks meeting tomorrow
afternoon. Then we can use that meeting to at least get up to speed
with the Qt6 ports and some idea of timelines.
David
On 1/10/22 12:51, David Edmundson wrote:
The last 5.X release definitely needs to be an LTS. That's unmovable.
We can't have two active LTSs, it'd be a backporting nightmare and at
best it would be a lie to claim we're actively supporting both.
An LTS now effectively means we can't start
On 10/01/2022 11:28, Marco Martin wrote:
> Optimal for them would be 5.24, but a potential problem is that is a quite
> feature heavy release, so it may be too buggy for an lts.
Not so much optimal, but the only possible option that would work for
22.04 LTS
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:52 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
> An LTS now effectively means we can't start Plasma 6 for another year.
> I personally think that's too late we're at a point where some people
> are building certain plasma repos against Qt6 already.
>
> I can envision Plasma 5.25 being
The last 5.X release definitely needs to be an LTS. That's unmovable.
We can't have two active LTSs, it'd be a backporting nightmare and at
best it would be a lie to claim we're actively supporting both.
An LTS now effectively means we can't start Plasma 6 for another year.
I personally think
as said in the meeting notes, there is a request from Opensuse and Kubuntu to
do a new Plasma LTS release.
Optimal for them would be 5.24, but a potential problem is that is a quite
feature heavy release, so it may be too buggy for an lts.
Opinions? ideas? do we go with 5.24? 5.25? or not lts
Am 2017-05-29 12:56, schrieb David Edmundson:
Stealing this LTS thread, there's something from Qt I'd like to copy:
Currently, Qt 5.6 LTS is in the _‘strict’_ phase where it only
receives selected critical fixes and next it is moving into the
‘_very strict_’ phase. During this final phase, Qt
On maandag 29 mei 2017 12:56:49 CEST David Edmundson wrote:
> Stealing this LTS thread, there's something from Qt I'd like to copy:
> >Currently, Qt 5.6 LTS is in the ‘strict’ phase where it only receives
> >selected critical fixes and next it is moving into the ‘very strict’
> >phase. During this
Stealing this LTS thread, there's something from Qt I'd like to copy:
>Currently, Qt 5.6 LTS is in the *‘strict’* phase where it only receives
selected critical fixes and next it is moving into the ‘*very strict*’
phase. During this final phase, Qt 5.6 LTS will receive important security
fixes
In data martedì 18 aprile 2017 16:37:18 CEST, Aleix Pol ha scritto:
Hello Aleix,
sorry for the delay in the response.
> Clearly having an LTS release doesn't cut it for openSUSE, as we
> already did that last time and for the next release we're receiving
> yet another e-mail like the house is
Am 2017-04-18 13:55, schrieb Luca Beltrame:
Hi everyone,
this is basically the same discussion as already took place for 5.8.
According to distrowatch, it looks very much like we're currently the
_only_
remaining Top 10 distro with KDE (Plasma+Apps) installed and used by
default.
Not only
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Luca Beltrame wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this is basically the same discussion as already took place for 5.8.
>
> According to distrowatch, it looks very much like we're currently the _only_
> remaining Top 10 distro with KDE (Plasma+Apps)
Hi everyone,
this is basically the same discussion as already took place for 5.8.
According to distrowatch, it looks very much like we're currently the _only_
remaining Top 10 distro with KDE (Plasma+Apps) installed and used by default.
Not only has Ubuntu switched to GNOME, for openSUSE
14 matches
Mail list logo