On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
What is Bug#587014? Do you have a link?
Panasonic is the only driver which will always try to use
native
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 16:24:28 Nicolas Limare wrote:
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52.
Can I in any way help this bug get more attention?
What is Bug#587014? Do you have a
No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is present.
Cristopher
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Is there a /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 directory as well as the
Panasonic one?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:14:40AM +0800, Cristopher Camacho wrote:
No, there is no. Only the /sys/class/backlight/panasonic/ directory is
present.
Can you attach the output of the acpidump command on your system?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Well, that's odd. There's certainly support for ACPI backlight control
in your firmware, and it goes via opregion so it should work correctly.
I think the thing to do here is to have the panasonic driver bail if
there's ACPI backlight support, and then figure out why the ACPI video
driver
