On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On 2015-04-22 17:41, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/python-setuptools.git;a=commitdiff;h=64c5aa5e97487c2879a621605724e4e64f85a933
blah, i do not understand what should i use in new specs
Does it make sense to have texlive.spec and texlive-texmf.spec?
I understand that the latter deals with much larger source file,
but then we have to deal with problems like the following
- amstex.1 manual is provided by texlive.spec
- amstex format and other files are provided by
Hi,
What's the point of bootstrap in texlive-texmf? foiltex build?
IMHO, foiltex should go to separate spec. This way we could
simplify texlive-texmf.spec.
Regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
Hi,
What is the status of TexLive 2011 in the repo at the moment?
Does it work at least a bit?
TexLive 2012 is out - anything against to skip 2011 and move to 2012 directly?
Regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
2012/8/14 Bartosz Taudul wolf@gmail.com:
2012/8/14 Artur Frysiak wi...@pld-linux.org:
Zanim Bartek dostanie ponownie RW to myślę, że osoby które dają mu +1
powinny robić review jego kodu.
Czyli mamy rozumieć, że sięgająca ponad rok historia podsyłanych
patchy jest niewystarczającym
2012/8/15 Bartosz Taudul wolf@gmail.com:
2012/8/15 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org:
Czyli mamy rozumieć, że sięgająca ponad rok historia podsyłanych
patchy jest niewystarczającym probierzem?
Nie.
To się określ czy 20 czy 30 lat wystarczy.
Moze. Popracuj nad kompromisem skoro Ci
Hi,
When starting system using kernel 3.5.0, then I am getting something around
BusyBox v1.19.3 (2012-01-13 00:33:55 CET) multi-call binary.
Usage: mknod [-m MODE] NAME TYPE MAJOR MINOR
Before that info that /dev/sda1 is missing and after some nice kernel oops.
Sorry for such lame bug
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On 01/08/12 22:38, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Artur Wroblewskiwrob...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
Hi,
When starting system using kernel 3.5.0, then I am getting something
around
BusyBox
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Paweł Sikora pl...@agmk.net wrote:
[...]
try to install udev-initrd, set USE_UDEV=yes in /etc/sysconfig/geninitrd and
regen initrd.
that helped. thanks.
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
Hi,
How to remove repository?
BTW. The HOWTO claims that ~/rpm/packages/builder
shall be used to build a package, but this one tries to fetch
spec files from CVS actually.
Regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Lord Blick lordbl...@gmail.com wrote:
In reply on message at 30.07.2012 20:02, from Artur Wroblewski:
Hi,
How to remove repository?
http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/cvs2git
http://www.pld-linux.org/dokuwiki/howto-git
Nothing there.
Regards,
w
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:29:50PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Lord Blick lordbl...@gmail.com wrote:
In reply on message at 30.07.2012 20:02, from Artur Wroblewski:
Hi,
How
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47:01AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
I am planning to upgrade IPython to version 0.13, but for Python 3.x only.
Python 2.7 is the last 2.x release (released over 2 years ago), so
IMHO
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47:01AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
I am planning to upgrade IPython to version 0.13, but for Python 3.x only
Hi,
I am planning to upgrade IPython to version 0.13, but for Python 3.x only.
Python 2.7 is the last 2.x release (released over 2 years ago), so
IMHO it is pointless to maintain two versions at the moment.
About Python 2.8 un-release
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2012/7/9 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org:
in irc questions rise up, including those and i proposed:
1. https://github.com/pld-linux - mirror of
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/5/31 Przemo Firszt prz...@firszt.eu:
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:54 +0200, Bartosz Świątek wrote:
2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt prz...@firszt.eu:
The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
applied, thanks
regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Pala go...@polanet.pl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 22:07:14 +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
I really really am confused now. You're pretending your side of the
story is how it's always been done in PLD. It's really not. HEAD was
always reserved
2012/4/21 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 13:14 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski
wrob...@pld-linux.org napisał:
2012/4/21 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
[...]
Stable is boring(tm).
well, why you have switched from the Ac and jumped on
the development distro line
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
it doesn't behave here so:
here it creates .pyc only for imported modules, if invoked via
#!/shebang, no .pyc is created for the script itself:
[...]
In
2012/4/20 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 01:03 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski
wrob...@pld-linux.org napisał:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org:
hi,
i would like to move gimp
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Ac is stable release for which we have appropriate branch and Th
is in constant development mode, isn't it?
This is one area where PLD's release system is actually pretty wonky.
Other than a few emebeded or very
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with
appropriate
branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain
that,
which I believe is full time job and lack of resources
hi,
i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD.
any argument against?
btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009. shall
they be removed, rebuilt?
regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
2012/4/19 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
W dniu 19 kwietnia 2012 21:32 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski
wrob...@pld-linux.org napisał:
hi,
i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD.
any argument against?
Yes. New gegl and babl break API/ABI compatibility with earlier
versions
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org:
hi,
i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD.
any argument against?
btw. we have some quite old gimp plugins on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009.
shall
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Bogusz qbo...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 02:06:26AM +0200, wrobell wrote:
BuildRequires: autoconf = 2.54
BuildRequires: automake = 1:1.11
+BuildRequires: elfutils-devel
Where did this come from?
libtool: link: gcc
On 27 Jan 2012 15:30, Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan R�korajski wrote:
Questions? Comments?
what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
imho, systemd decision is similar to choosing xorg over old xfree86,
texlive over
2011/8/13 Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee:
no attention there, so maybe gets here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148
yes, it should.
best regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
2011/8/14 Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee:
On 08/14/2011 01:33 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
2011/8/13 Elan Ruusamäeg...@delfi.ee:
no attention there, so maybe gets here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148
yes, it should.
should what?
ticket proposes (questions) several options
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
[...]
We lose:
- a little bit of the disk space
- some 'purity' some people see in not distributing 'sources'
IMHO, it was not about purity but quite practical aspect of
file distribution (src vs. bin) - we treated byte
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
[...]
We lose:
- a little bit of the disk space
- some 'purity' some people see
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not
packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So it doesn't have to be listed
explicitly for every python package. I am thinking about something like
%find_lang –
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org wrote:
[...]
Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2
during the weekend using source files and __pycache__.
Done.
I have upgraded few packages, too. Some of them are not done
in nice way (i.e
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:22:04PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not
packaging
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Jakub Bogusz qbo...@pld-linux.org wrote:
[...]
So we have to decide how to package python distribution (and possibly
all python3 modules, if distutils use __pycache__ too) - there are
two solutions:
- package all modules in source form together with __pycache__
There is also
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jA6s9GD0sh2vKRhR2zat
to study.
We could also think about zipping of the modules later...
Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2
during the weekend using source files and __pycache__.
Is that OK?
Regards,
w
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:26:46PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 04.05.2011 16:18, Kacper Kornet wrote:
So if someone (glen?) can give good a good reason why the GIT_*
variables are propagated in PLD it would be great.
arekm already answered:
To avoid a need to set all that on each
2011/4/10 Jakub Bogusz qbo...@pld-linux.org:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:03:44PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
as for the .py sources packaging, i'd move them to -debuginfo package so
the could be installed optionally
Are you aware that some python
2010/11/16 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org:
[...]
the following list of packages were removed from th-main (still available in
th-obsolete)
they were removed because the packages were renamed
or some other reason why .spec does not exist in cvs HEAD
as well, i would remove all gtk+/glib
Hi all,
Does anyone have a TH builder for PowerPC (more or less updated?)
Best regards,
w
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jeff Johnson wrote:
[...]
Did Poland do well in South Africa?
Not so bad, we have not lost any game yet.
Lots of ties eh? ;-)
No ties, it is just impossible for us to loose. :)
2010/5/6 Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee:
hi there
what you think about repcached http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
should we create new package, or just patch our memcached?
have repcached guys ever proposed the patch to memcached
authors and what was the outcome?
as well, problem can be with
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Thanks for the links to relevant current developer documentation. I'll
keep an eye on those guidelines.
I have to say that even having been an avid PLD user for 10+ years the
lack of clear easy to find documentation
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote:
So what are exact rules at the moment?
What if someone wants to create another branch of distro?
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Marcin Krol h...@limanowa.net wrote:
I'd like to know that too. When I've created Titanium I was keeping
separate branches on some specs. That was baad, because I wasn't merging
my changes/updates to HEAD.
But that's not our fault, is it? :)
Yes it is. Hawk
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tomasz Pala go...@polanet.pl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:33:58 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
Seems fine for me, but it will still be trashing HEAD for some people
I'm afraid. The only thing that will change is %if. Instead of
%if %{pld_release} == ti
[...]
2009/12/31 Paweł Zuzelski z...@xatka.net:
Hello,
currently in PLD it is impossible to install few JDKs or JREs on
single system, because of files in %{_mandir} and %{_bindir}. All
the files in %{_bindir} are symlinks to some path containing JVM
vendor and version number (for example:
49 matches
Mail list logo
