2012/8/14 Artur Frysiak wi...@pld-linux.org:
Zanim Bartek dostanie ponownie RW to myślę, że osoby które dają mu +1
powinny robić review jego kodu.
Czyli mamy rozumieć, że sięgająca ponad rok historia podsyłanych
patchy jest niewystarczającym probierzem? Chyba te kilka osób dających
+1 już taki
2012/8/15 Artur Wroblewski wrob...@pld-linux.org:
Czyli mamy rozumieć, że sięgająca ponad rok historia podsyłanych
patchy jest niewystarczającym probierzem?
Nie.
To się określ czy 20 czy 30 lat wystarczy.
Masz po prostu przestac rznac glupa.
Chyba ty.
Jedna osoba wczesniej zasugerowala, ze
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Which brings us to the next problem. This user has been banned from
the development lists for bad behavior, in particular a consistent
series of posts that people felt were trolling and non-constructive.
Since being on
2012/8/8 Piotr Budny piotr.bu...@gmail.com:
Ponieważ Bartek cały czas jest żywotnie zainteresowany rozwojem
dystrybucji i aktywnie przyczynia się do wprowadzania zmian, proponuję
Z mojej strony +1.
+1
+1
Bartek, wyślij nazwę użytkownika oraz skrót hasła do cvsadmina
(oczywiście, jeśli
2012/8/8 Paweł Gołaszewski bl...@pld-linux.org:
Żartujesz, tak?
Bo się ciebie nie zapytał najpierw o pozwolenie?
Przecież on sam zrezygnował
Podobnie jak mkochano, co ci zupełnie nie przeszkadzało w słaniu mu zaproszeń:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-devel-pl@pld-linux.org/msg16583.html
wolf
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
First of all, the user you are suggesting for RW access previously had
such access and voluntarily dropped it, publicly resigning from the
project.
Search the mailing list archives for mkochano who also dropped his
RW
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt prz...@firszt.eu:
--
Przemo Firszt prz...@firszt.eu
--
I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LONG time. -Guy Kawasaki
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org wrote:
why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
You don't have to understand.
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz ar...@maven.pl wrote:
I am for including py files.
That's the only argument you need. Suck it up, glen.
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mateusz Korniak
mate...@ant.gliwice.pl wrote:
Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost
of little extra disk space.
Are we having this idiotic argument again? Do we package debuginfo
with compiled programs, or does it land in
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Artur Wroblewski
wrob...@pld-linux.org wrote:
1. DEVEL is for unstable versions - we are talking about RC.
If this Release Candidate is stable, then why is it a Release
Candidate and not the final version? Please tell us.
2. the release announcement contains
2012/4/21 Bartosz Świątek shad...@gmail.com:
It may seem unbelievable to you, but there are people who use
*uncritical* *programs* for living. How absurd is that! Right?
I am thinking about doing some changes to apache. Or maybe mysql. No,
python would be the best one to modify. Think breaks
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Przemo Firszt prz...@firszt.eu wrote:
Anyone tried to experiment with gitolite + git submodules?
http://git.tld-linux.org/
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
2012/2/7 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz ar...@maven.pl:
Please stop this personal crap.
Better share with us about what is the actuall problem with this bcond? I
cannot tell that from reading your commit logs.
Jakbyś nie odpierdalał personal crapu z abw, to by sobie glen mógł
przeczytać o co chodzi.
2011/5/23 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org:
and what's the problem there?
No problem at all...
none of the legacy drivers are in th because 1.10 xorg in th, so any commit
is better than before
By using that logic I may break any package and say that the broken
version is not on the ftp, so
2011/5/4 Pawel Golaszewski bl...@pld-linux.org:
it's private glen's config in global stuff...
Shadzik, stop pretending you are blues!
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Yes, the Provides and Obsoletes will take care of being able to
upgrade and replace the previous package names. The problem is that
there is no notification feature for the OLD packages, they just get
stuck at an old
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Caleb Maclennan ca...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Wolf, I feel like I'm on the outside of an insider joke.
You will need a prayer book if you want to do merges in CVS.
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Piotr Budny piotr.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to that proposition, it should be also discussed list of active CDG
members.
According to sklad.txt and e.g. PLD Linux CVS Statistics - 2010 that list is
obsolete.
The admision/removal of a CDG member is accomplished
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Mariusz Mazur mma...@kernel.pl wrote:
The admision/removal of a CDG member is accomplished by a 2/3 majority
vote with a minimum of 50% turnout. Only CDG members vote.
With the current cdg member's list, any vote will result in at least 50% of
members getting
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, lisu l...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Author: lisu Date: Fri Nov 19 07:49:44 2010 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- reverse,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz ar...@maven.pl wrote:
2010/9/27 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org:
do you know, that if you say +1, you must mentor his commits, i.e
correct him and explain things, not just say yes
AFAIK the above rule applies only to the first person
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
I don't think anyone
would use PLD to write commercial games).
Aj tam nie pierdol.
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
2010/6/24 Paweł Zuzelski z...@xatka.net:
Any comments?
Why do we care about RPM groups?
wolf
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
2010/6/24 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com:
Why do we care about RPM groups?
What else would we discuss if RPMTAG_GROUP did not exist?
I was referring to the general shit state of the group hierarchy in
PLD. Basically 90% of the stuff is in Applications or
X11/Applications, which makes the groups
New group hierarchy proposition can be found at
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/PLD-doc/nowe-grupy?rev=HEAD.
This tree is as good as any other I've seen, certainly far far
better than synaptic/aptitude choices.
It was based on sourceforge trove software map.
Have you considered:
[17:35 w...@bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% cvs up -r 1.603 builder
P builder
[17:35 w...@bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% ./builder -g oneko
# $Revision: 1.18 $, $Date: 2008/07/27 22:18:56 $
oneko-1.2.tar.gz having proper md5sum already exists
[17:35 w...@bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% cvs up -r 1.604 builder
P
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it...
Jokes go to fortunes CVS module, not here.
wolf
--
Bartek .
Taudul :
.:
w o l f @ p
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:59:27PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
how many out there use custom kernel anyway (i mean by that kernel installed
without rpm package)?
What kind of bullshit argument is it supposed to be? How many out
there be developers who don't understand polish? Why am I even
2008/7/17 Mariusz Mazur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, condoning bad code practices is the way to go. Go install your
ubuntu.
It's bad in theory. In practice, for the past mny years nobody gives a
shit about theory in case of /bin/sh.
Bad for them.
So that's top score for theory and a FAIL on
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:47:31PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I'm against
being forced to do something counter-productive in order to get some
I'm against being forced to have some shit installed on my computer that
only some lazy developer needs.
In other words - we are one of the most
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
It's not a reliable system when any application can fail because it either
expects something that all of the other distros, except us, have (sh - bash)
Yes, condoning bad code practices is the way to go. Go install your
ubuntu.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:00:23AM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
Author: wolf Date: Wed Jun 11 21:56:45 2008 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- niech sobie ankry przenosi do SOURCES
Files affected:
SPECS:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 02:49:25PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
+1
+1
-1
-57
*2
dx (c=-1)
wolf
--
Bartek .
Taudul :
.:
w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
+1
+1
-1
-57
wolf
--
Bartek .
Taudul :
.:
w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g.:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:41:16PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I often use a simple script to convert Fedora specs to proper PLD
format (for obvious reasons: most of the Fedora specs make adapter cry
even after 3+ runs and these guys tend to override lots of macros in
each spec file). Had I
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
I mean generators are only useful when they make your work easier. If
it's easier to fix and maintain the result than to fix the generator
then it shouldn't be a real problem.
fortunes-pl.spec generator is really simple. It's just
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:24:40PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
http://opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3312217.html
Does it mean that glitz do nothing in cairo or what?
git://people.freedesktop.org/~macslow/glitz-test
Try to run that without glitz support in cairo.
wolf
--
Bartek
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 09:24:54PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
when i switch back to mono 1.3.x, then it works perfectly.
f-spot fails in the same way. works whith mono 1.3.x, though.
What mono 1.3.x?
wolf
--
Bartek .
Taudul :
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Łukasz Jernaś wrote:
I just want to drop a note here that current mono-find-requires doesn't find
libraries p-invoked from mono assemblies. They can be partially get from
monodis --moduleref assembly but some sort of mechanism for pulling the
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
New poldek snap (0.20070617.23) was sent to Th builders. It has improvements
in handling package colors and *tadam* multilib capabilities.
Please test :)
błąd: libxslt-1.1.21-1.athlon package color (0) is not equal to
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:32:54PM +0100, Rafał Cygnarowski wrote:
Besides... if there is problem with thouse devices on smp kernel than it
should be fixed and I think it's the correct way to solve problem (not
running away to up kernel...).
So fix them and then we'll talk. There are many
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:40:32PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
why snapshot in Version field? should use snapshot date in Release to avoid
epoch bumps.
It was late and I was too lazy to do that, but eager to see the new
eyecandy. BTW, everybody fears bumping epoch, but I don't recall anyone
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:19:55PM +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
That's not a matter of bootstrap - I did it with 1.1.16 and had those
mscorlib deps unresolved.
So the generators were broken instead of being fixed by the mono team.
I guess we'll stick to manual provides, unless someone wants
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:32:45AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
that's a bad dep. /etc/sysconfig is processed anyway as root from %post
scripts
as well we don't require pkgconfig in packages providing .pc files.
Yes, it's a bad dependency, but without it there are problems with
upgrading rpm
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:07:51AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
/etc/sysconfig is needed by rpm-base-4.4.6-1.2.i686
that's something new in rpm?
Yes, it appeared in 4.4.6.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Stare porzekadła, przysłowia są takie dobre, bo zawsze można
Taudul :wybrać to które
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:06:19PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
Don't you tempt me ; [1]
[1] to upgrade gcc to 3.4.x in AC...
That would be just great. Do something currently, when AC is freezed,
what hasn't been done for 2 or 3 years just because we were going to
freeze AC in the next month
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
in binary rpm's. why pointless?
Few KB more or less per rpm makes no difference for me.
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
Assuming every package has 10 KB worth of changelog, then we're talking
about 14 MB of almost
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:42:30PM +0200, Marcin Król wrote:
[14:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% rpm -qa|wc -l
1423
So? As I said, that makes no difference _for me_
So? I said it makes difference _for me_.
wolf
--
Bartek . - O! Jest ten co wypisuje o mnie bzdury.
Taudul :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
If anyone is interested:
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/
What about sending it to builders?
wolf
--
Bartek . - Pan długopisem stawia?
Taudul : - A co się będę chrzanił.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:49:51PM +0100, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/openoffice.org/
What about sending it to builders?
It is easy to guess why it is wrong time: arekm is building new kde.
And locking builders for many hours while it may be neccessary in
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:03:50PM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
wrote:
summary:
- pnetlib doesn't build with resgen from mono
- nant doesn't build with resgen from pnet
how resolve it? have you any ideas? (other than remove pnet)
Maybe rename pnet's resgen to, for example,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:55:52PM +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
works pretty well on two radeons (r200 and r300). On r200 with EXA and
DRI, on r300 only 2D. since yesterday no problems here.
Works, r300 with 3D acceleration.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Wiecie po co człowiek ma uszy? Żeby
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:57:46AM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
wrote:
why not use resgen from pnet, which is available on all platforms?
It's only asking for trouble IMHO. I don't want to debug some weird
errors introduced by using not-from-mono-unlike-rest-of-toolchain
utility.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:29:55PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
what about just creating new package rpm-monoprov and requiring that package
on BR?
What should be in that package? macros.* are provided by rpm-build and
mono-find-* are from mono.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Kto tam śpi?
Taudul
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:38:21PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
why thse are in /usr/bin, while other similiar scripts are in /usr/lib/rpm?
Mono places them there. If it's good or not is open to discussion.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Przy drobnych przeliczeniach, które zajmą ci stronę...
Taudul
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:42:24PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i believe proper way of doing it is require some rpmbuild(macros) version
(don't forget to document it in PLD-doc/BuildRequires.txt), in case someone
backports it to ac-branch 4.4.1 version of rpm
Almost all changes are in rpm's
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:51:28AM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
-# because of -fvisibility... related fixes
-Requires: gcc = 5:4.0.1-0.20050514.2
Was that on purpose?
I can't see anything related to -fvisibility in rpm on HEAD. Furthermore:
% cvs log rpm.macros
revision 1.227
date:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:03:15PM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
+Revision 1.77 2005/08/03 14:19:04 freetz
+- broken, rel. down to 0.1
If you elaborate what it is that you find broken, there's a chance that
someone will fix it.
sending a problem description to authors it's not
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:45:59PM +0200, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
don't like my commits? feel free to report a abuse to PLD CDG.
Not yet.
wolf
--
Bartek . - Będzie was obowiązywało (...) Nie na jutro broń boże, tylko
Taudul :na pojutrze.
60 matches
Mail list logo
