On 13.11.2012 23:57, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 20:16:36 +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
It makes use of debug symbols, but it's not _strictly_ dependant. I use
some older build for quite a long time.
IMHO it still will be convenient to build it from kernel.spec, just not
add
Hi,
I have just found this:
http://serverfault.com/questions/448125/linux-finding-the-system-processes-which-are-at-the-top
and this:
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool… but I cannot find it in
PLD. It should be probably built from
On 13.11.2012 13:25, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Hi,
I have just found this:
http://serverfault.com/questions/448125/linux-finding-the-system-processes-which-are-at-the-top
and this:
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool… but I cannot find
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool??? but I cannot find it in
PLD. It should be probably built from kernel.spec.
If it's stricly dependant on kernel version then most likely should build
from
kernel.spec
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:31:05PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool??? but I cannot find it in
PLD. It should be probably built from kernel.spec.
If it's stricly dependant on
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 20:16:36 +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
It makes use of debug symbols, but it's not _strictly_ dependant. I use
some older build for quite a long time.
IMHO it still will be convenient to build it from kernel.spec, just not
add strict dependencies to the kernel it was
