On 07.05.2015 20:31, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Besides, we do want to phase out rc-scripts
so please don't add new features like this.
systemd does not work for me, nobody is interested fixing it for me. and
i do not have energy for that either.
--
glen
On Sun, 03 May 2015, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
the pretty common checkconfig() function body could be added to rc-scripts,
if we could standardize variable name used for the msg_ parameters:
show Checking %s configuration $svname
here it was $svname, but probably good one is $SERVICE_NAME?
On 06.05.2015 06:58, Tomasz Pala wrote:
You wouldn't create the thread for a variable_name_, would you?
yes. that was the question.
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:40:07 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
1. rc-scripts are dead, please do not mess there in a way that forces
anyone to upgrade them (especially by mass-converting init scripts to
a new generic function).
rc-scripts are not read as long as i still use them!
Godspeed!
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 23:11:46 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
the pretty common checkconfig() function body could be added to rc-scripts,
if we could standardize variable name used for the msg_ parameters:
show Checking %s configuration $svname
1. rc-scripts are dead, please do not mess
On 04.05.2015 11:01, Tomasz Pala wrote:
1. rc-scripts are dead, please do not mess there in a way that forces
anyone to upgrade them (especially by mass-converting init scripts to
a new generic function).
rc-scripts are not read as long as i still use them!
so, please stay on topic! if you
the pretty common checkconfig() function body could be added to rc-scripts,
if we could standardize variable name used for the msg_ parameters:
show Checking %s configuration $svname
here it was $svname, but probably good one is $SERVICE_NAME?
On 03.05.2015 23:04, glen wrote:
commit
