On Thursday 05 January 2006 00:18, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:04, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote:
but today this trick didn't work because i couldn't send any input to
started shell!!!, i guess this is because my /dev is empty and no udev
started.
Your dev should
On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:46, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:01:28PM +0100, glen wrote:
Author: glen Date: Sat Dec 31 16:01:28 2005 GMT
Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- disable reload, as server dies instead
--- Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but today this trick didn't work because i couldn't send any input to
started shell!!!, i guess this is because my /dev is empty and no
udev started.
Your dev should not be empty (there are at least static /dev/null and
--- havner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:39:59PM +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
Was called by what? Existance of a file means its executed? I dont get
something here. And why this does not affect hotplug package itself
where /sbin/hotplug exists and /dev/ is
klogd is broken. it loads symbols and then says there were no symbols:
Jan 5 18:27:24 black kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Jan 5 18:27:24 black kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.12.5-0.2
Jan 5 18:27:24 black kernel: Loaded 26743 symbols from
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski napisał(a):
--- Jakub Piotr Cłapa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the hotplug issue by any chance related to the fact that after booting i
got on screen message starting udev and it stays there forever stopping
maching bootup. can't even kill it with SAK.
Shouldn't but
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 08:15:21PM +0100, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote:
the trick was:
replacing
[ -x /sbin/start_udev ] run_cmd Starting udev /sbin/start_udev
with
/sbin/start_udev
in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit
And what's the real difference between this two?
run_cmd creates a pipe and
