i believe the macros should be just moved to rpm-build-macros
and the macros.java be added to main rpm(-build) package, because you can't
fetch specs (with builder) if some %include is missing.
On Monday 22 May 2006 02:09, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
IMO more changes are required in this file.
On Monday 22 May 2006 14:31, qboosh wrote:
Author: qboosh Date: Mon May 22 11:31:59 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- updated to 1.3.36; acc. to announcement include wildcards have been fixed
oh. thank god don't have to merge the
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:09:27AM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
IMO more changes are required in this file.
%define _jvmdir %{_prefix}/lib/jvm
Why not %{_libdir}/jvm (or %{_prefix}/%{_lib}/jvm)?
(and similarly all other %{_prefix}/lib/j*)
Yes, that could be changed -- that was copied
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 16:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
$ ./builder -bp -r LINUX_2_6 kernel.spec
[...]
--15:21:35-- http://bluetooth-alsa.sourceforge.net/sco-mtu.patch
= `sco-mtu.patch'
[...]
cvs server: move away sco-mtu.patch; it is in the way
C sco-mtu.patch
the offending change
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 17:20, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i noticed the bug too, and i wasn't sure is it worth to fix, as if the
source patch and patch in cvs are identical, there's no such warning
issued. so in most cases just update the patch in SOURCES?
i was wrong here. the bug is not
