Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Wednesday 31 of August 2011, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, arekm wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it)

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 01.09.2011 09:23, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Wednesday 31 of August 2011, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, arekm wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:48:00AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +1 for keeping it in util-linux and removing from elsewhere. rationale: util-linux is maintained the rest is not (upstart does not have it,

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Thursday 01 of September 2011, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:48:00AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +1 for keeping it in util-linux and removing from elsewhere. rationale: util-linux

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Don't +1, someone just do it 8-) Shouldn't we first agree on one version? Someone decided it should be removed from util-linux, so before reverting that IMHO it is good to see who wants the change. Otherwise we could end up

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Thursday 01 of September 2011, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Don't +1, someone just do it 8-) Shouldn't we first agree on one version? Someone decided it should be removed from util-linux, No, no. It was never in util-linux

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 01.09.2011 12:55, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Thursday 01 of September 2011, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:48:00AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint +1 for keeping it in util-linux and removing

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it) [...] -%attr(755,root,root)

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 09/01/2011 12:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Don't +1, someone just do it 8-) this is a bit more difficult that it may seem at first sight. if keeping it in util-linux.spec, removing from SysVinit.spec and upstart-SysVinit.spec, then in which package it exactly go? glen@carme-pld

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Artur Frysiak
2011/9/1 Elan Ruusamäe g...@delfi.ee: On 09/01/2011 12:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Don't +1, someone just do it 8-) this is a bit more difficult that it may seem at first sight. if keeping it in util-linux.spec, removing from SysVinit.spec and upstart-SysVinit.spec, then in which

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 09/01/2011 10:17 PM, Artur Frysiak wrote: 2011/9/1 Elan Ruusamäeg...@delfi.ee: On 09/01/2011 12:55 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Don't +1, someone just do it 8-) this is a bit more difficult that it may seem at first sight. if keeping it in util-linux.spec, removing from SysVinit.spec