On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Don't +1, someone just do it 8-)
Shouldn't we first agree on one version? Someone decided it should be
removed from util-linux, so before reverting that IMHO it is good to
see who wants the change. Otherwise we could end up
On the Polish mailing list there is discussion about systemd support.
SysVinit is evil and needs to be replaced – its hard to argue about
that. Though, I have already done some work to replace SysVinit with
Upstart.
The question is, should we now start maintaining the third init
subsystem? Or
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:30:19PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.01.2012 15:26, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Questions? Comments?
what if i don't want systemd, i want legacy sysvinit/rc-scripts
Just do not install the 'systemd' package and keep using SysVinit and
rc-scripts. I see no reason to
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:58:33PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
how to proceed here?
for first problem, make all -x scripts executed, not sourced?
Aren't the scripts supposed to set session environment in different
ways? Running them in a subprocess won't help in this task…
Greets,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:45:39AM +0100, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
There is added header:
# charset used for text/* mimetypes
mimetype_textcharset = utf-8
...and some charset= + mimetype_textcharset entries.
It causes problems because encoding is not detected in pages, always utf-8
is
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:42:47PM +0100, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
Any docs about that option? I can't find anything about that...
equivalent in apache what was wanted to achieve in lighttpd:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
ftp move is comming soon, todo list:
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready.txt
error: browser-plugin-java-icedtea-web-1.2-1: req
icedtea-web-jre-base-mozilla-plugin = 1.2-1 not found
error:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
it doesn't behave here so:
here it creates .pyc only for imported modules, if invoked via
#!/shebang, no .pyc is created for the script itself:
[...]
In case if %{_bindir} or %{_sbindir} - no script should be named *.py
there
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 11 of May 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong
opposition and I am for including py files. It
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jajcus jaj...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Author: jajcus Date: Fri May 11 12:21:20 2012 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- new package
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:02:44PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 04.06.2012 17:48, mmazur wrote:
Author: mmazur Date: Mon Jun 4 14:48:55 2012 GMT
Module: packages Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- rel 4
- remove the lsb-style init stanzas from
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:36:56AM +0200, draenog wrote:
Files affected:
packages/git-core-slug:
git-core-slug.spec (1.18 - 1.19)
Why is this package called 'git-core-slug'? It is not in any way part of
the GIT core, is it? Wouldn't 'git-slug' or just 'slug' or 'pld-slug' be
better?
Hello,
At work we use clusters. Currently based on Heartbeat/PaceMaker/DRBD,
but I am trying to introduce Corosync and clustered LVM. All based on
PLD packages… and I have found a bit of mess in our packages.
We have both corosync and openais, but our openais is 0.80, not 1.x
which uses corosync
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Does anybody still needs openais 0.80?
Updated question: does anybody still need openais at all? It seems not
maintained any more and won't build with corosync 2.0… and other stuff
seem to expect corosync 2 now…
I guess openais
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:36:57PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Does anybody still needs openais 0.80?
Updated question: does anybody still need openais at all? It seems not
maintained any more and won't build with corosync
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Tomasz Rutkowski wrote:
cluster.spec was my work of 3rd generation of redhat cluster suite
(dlm+cman+gfs2+rgmanager), there is bcond in lvm2 to complete stack, but
it's already outdated (needs polishing :))
I have replaced this bcond with something
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:47:19PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 07/01/2012 11:51 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Do we need clvmd in the main lvm2 package? It pulls some dependencies
irrelevant for non-clustered setups.
i'm in for moving clustered deps to subpackages. if it's doable.
Already
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:45:41AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
anyone interested working that out (so that udev can be again optional
for rootfs on lvm systems)?
Is udev on initrams that bad, that you just don't want to use it? Are
there scenarios where udev just won't work?
It may be just
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:38:25PM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
Proposal:
leave java-sun as 1.6.x line and make brand new package as oracle-java (or
java-oracle).
I don't like this – this would suggest one comes from Sun, the other
from Oracle, while both are from Oracle now and both were
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:15:18AM +0200, Tomasz Rutkowski wrote:
What do you mean by '3.1 won't build with pacemaker'? There was no
pacemaker dependency in cluster.spec
well, if You would like to control dlm space from within pacemaker You
need daemon dlm_controld.pcmk - this one
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
In the meantime I have added threading of messages. So now new branch
creation looks like in the thread starting with mail:
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/test/Week-of-Mon-20120702/000132.html
All commits in a
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2012/7/9 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org:
in irc questions rise up, including those and i proposed:
1. https://github.com/pld-linux - mirror of git.pld-linux.org/packages
Why we need mirror of our git in external system?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:14:05AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
Having the project in github may give us a lot of publicity. And github
gives great tools for third parties to work with our repos (fork them,
do work
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:03:44PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
A small doubt about it. Package rpm-build-tools is cloned to chroots
used by builders. Are all this tools really needed there?
If they do not pull further dependencies, they won't hurt.
Greets,
Jacek
Hi,
[jajcus@jajo rpm-build-tools]$ ../builder -bb rpm-build-tools.spec
builder: SMP make flags are set to -j1
Already up-to-date.
Available branches: AC-brach AC-branch DEVEL LIBCHAMPLAIN_0_8
NEW_PEAR_REQUIRES PATCH_MD5 PLD RA-branch master niceprint rpm-4_1-15_1
rpm-4_4_3 rpm-4_4_6
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:16:02PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Kacper Kornet drae...@pld-linux.org wrote:
That can be because 'git rev-list', used to generate the changelog,
returns the commits ordered by commit date and not the AuthorDate
Doing
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:47:41PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
b) will introduce some incompatibilities: for starters,
there's functionality already implemented to truncate
change log's by number/oldest that will break if you
just go unordered.
But that would be not 'totally unordered'. GIT
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:47:01AM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
I am planning to upgrade IPython to version 0.13, but for Python 3.x only.
Python 2.7 is the last 2.x release (released over 2 years ago), so
IMHO it is pointless to maintain two versions at the moment.
There is still many
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:40:51PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
there's still no place for template-specs in git
pls import it to git, or whatever is their place, so changes to git
based vcs to them can be committed
I've
Hi,
What is the current procedure for renaming packages in git?
Both cases: when the package already has some auto/ tags and when it
does not.
Todays candidate to rename is:
python-pyzmq - python-zmq
(python package name is 'zmq' – 'import zmq')
This one has not been built yet, so it is
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:05:31AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
i think this hasn't come out as nobody pointed it, but pep-3147 says
that the old .pyc only distribution is still possible:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3147/
For backward compatibility, Python will still support
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
- rpm 5.4.x
Yeah!
+1
And we should re-consider every of our current rpm patches, even if some
functionality should be sacrificed.
- full systemd support (provide systemd units, but still support SysV
scripts - at least
Repository admin request:
ssh g...@git.pld-linux.org trash icedtea
'icedtea6' (Java 6 implementation) package is the maintained one and
'icedtea7' (Java 7) is about to come. The 'icedtea' GIT repository is
also present, but I guess it is some kind of a mistake.
Greets,
Jacek
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:50:54PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
from cvs i look they have different history:
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/packages/icedtea/icedtea.spec?view=log
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/packages/icedtea6/icedtea6.spec?view=log
imho
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:06:45PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
There's no well defined semantic for
Provides: group(mpd)
even if PLD has adopted some convention afaik. The
Provides: group(mpd)
is just a string and (imho) should be removed
if there are problems unless there is
Hello,
I wanted to boot my servers natively, from UEFI, instead of BIOS
compatibility mode. I wanted to use GRUB for that, but found out GRUB2
in PLD lacks EFI support.
First I have updated out grub2.spec from version 1.99 to 2.00, then
I have started adding EFI support. For that I have removed
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:23:16PM +0100, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Please note: now the 'grub2' package does not contain any platform
files. You have to install grub2-pc (or grub2-efi) too.
virtual provides grub2-platform in each platform
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:39:54PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
Booted without problems :)
so, can you wraite a mini-howto for migrating from grub-legacy to grub2-eufi
for machines with / on lvm on raid ? :)
I don't have EFI on my laptop. And no RAID, but Luks.
Migrating from grub-legacy to
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 06:09:30PM +0200, Michael Shigorin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 02:56:25PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Migrating a server with / on LVM on hardware RAID from
GRUB-legacy/BIOS to GRUB2/EFI was much more complicated
Just in case, I've got an AMD C60 based board
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Michael Shigorin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Can you test the GRUB/EFI installation with standard PLD kernel?
What ISO should I burn for the starters?
Oops… that is not that easy ;) I have assumed you
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 08:12:29PM +0100, Grzesiek wrote:
I'm using grub2 but some old version from RCD because new packages from
TH won't fit into my MBR.
Why do you want grub installed in MBR? I don't think any GRUB would fit into
446 bytes.
I guess you mean one of the options often used
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 09:27:29PM +0100, Grzesiek wrote:
I guess you mean one of the options often used with legacy grub:
1. the space between MBR and the first partition
2. the unused space at the beginning of a ext[234] file system
Which one? And how much space do you have there?
The
There is this piece of code in grub2.spec:
%triggerpostun -- %{name} %{version}-0
if [ $1 -le 1 ]; then
exit 0
fi
echo Grub was upgraded, trying to setup it to boot sector
/sbin/grub-install '(hd0)' || :
And I don't like it.
Having grub installed does not mean one wants it
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:32:53AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
/sbin/grub-install '(hd0)' || :
And I don't like it.
would you run git blame first on it?
https://github.com/pld-linux/grub2/blame/master/grub2.spec
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:36:36AM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
that would do, if you want to upgrade grub automatically on upgrade,
maybe just leave sysadmin deal with it when he has time?
Yes, that is the right way.
as if your system boots, you don't usually want to touch it. grub maybe
Hi,
It seems I was too fast with my 'Xen boots from GRUB2 on EFI without
problems' statement… It seems Xen booted this way has some big problems
(only one CPU visible, invalid IRQ mapping, no ACPI, etc.)…
It seems, the right way to boot Xen is to compile Xen as an EFI binary
and run that
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:35:18PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
[...]
-# Send DBUS signals on all events.
-SEND_DBUS_SIGNALS=yes
-
-# Log all events.
-LOG_ALL_EVENTS=no
+# log and signal over DBus all events
+OPTIONS=-l -d
So systemd is so great everyone must learn all daemon
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:56:05PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 30.10.2012 14:24, jajcus wrote:
index a268cf5..40c39f5 100644
--- a/corosync-notifyd.sysconfig
+++ b/corosync-notifyd.sysconfig
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
-# log and signal over DBus all events
+# Options for the
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
That would be acceptable - document at least those options, which were
supported by SysV init script and add a pointer to documentation
(proper man page, text file or so) for full options list.
No descriptive options in the
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 01:50:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Any thoughts? Does anybody know how other distros solve this problem?
I have not expected such a heated discussion here… thanks for all your
comments and suggestions…
So I have created another monster – the 'efi-boot-update
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 11:10:56PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 11/04/2012 12:52 PM, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
Note: with current git log - %changelog generation you can't begin
changelog entry with %post (or other rpm section keyword) - it would
cause changelog to end immediately, thus leading
Hello,
Since when is this an error? RPM5?
error: File(s) packaged into both bacula-console-wx-5.2.12-1.x86_64 and
bacula-console-qt4-5.2.12-1.x86_64:
/usr/share/pixmaps/bacula.png
from:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:06:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Note that having a file replace another package's content
on same path
What do you mean by that? Installing two packages containing the same
path with '--force'?
Greets,
Jacek
Hi,
I have just found this:
http://serverfault.com/questions/448125/linux-finding-the-system-processes-which-are-at-the-top
and this:
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool… but I cannot find it in
PLD. It should be probably built from
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:31:05PM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:06 +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
It seems the 'perf' utility may be a great tool??? but I cannot find it in
PLD. It should be probably built from kernel.spec.
If it's stricly dependant on
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Kacper Kornet wrote:
But I've been just surprised that it is actually required by vim? Does
someone know the reason? For test I installed vim without vim-rt and it
seems to work. But maybe I'm missing something.
I guess this requirement was added
Hi,
I have sent icedtea6 and icedtea7 build requests to our builders (single
arch each, as they are heavy). STBR request for icedtea6 had been send much
earlier, but icedtea7 has already finished, and icedtea6 is still
'building'.
Can anybody check what is happening there? IIRC we used to have
Hi,
I am building a system image for a PLD-based distribution using poldek.
It used to work well until I have upgraded my RPM from 4.5 to 5.4.12.
Now the packages are installed in wrong order, %post scripts fail and
the whole image build fails.
poldek --verify=order gives a reasonable order:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 13:52:02 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
What follows is a dependency LOOP with exactly the same information
as before.
Before the RPM upgrade when I got a 'LOOP:' message, it contain two or
three clearly related packages:
error: LOOP:
error: removing
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 11:58:57 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Maybe. I can say that the existing rpm implementation has been used
by many for years without any change whatsoever.
FIx your LOOP before guessing at what is broken.
But THERE IS NO LOOP. RPM shows loop due to some
Re-sending this mail… it was not sent for some reason…
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:55:30 +0200
Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
First two are clear:
iproute2-3.4.0-1.aos2.i686 requires '/bin/sh', so it pulls pdksh…
then pdksh-5.2.14-56.aos2.i686 requires '/usr/share/man/man1
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:49:28 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
But THERE IS NO LOOP. RPM shows loop due to some imaginary
dependency.
Before shouting (or comparing to rpm-4.5 behavior),
It was a bit rude, indeed. But I am frustrated. And my mail with
important details didn't get
Hi,
Trying to debug my package installation 'LOOP:' problems I have
instrumented the RPM source code with many 'rpmlog(RPMLOG_DEBUG, ...)',
so I could understand what is happening there.
After hours of such debugging I found out what is going on: for each
dependency rpmalSatisfiesDepend() is
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:26:38 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
Yes. The Bloom filters been in use for about 3 years with no known
problems, including randomized installations for 5-10 linux distros
under a CI harness.
THe performance/memory gains are significant.
Are there any
Cc: pld-devel-en, as the discussion may be interesting for others too
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:43:05 +0300
Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On 14/10/13 20:10, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
(as you know the other webservers are populated with triggers
What triggers? You mean that '# make sure
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:15:33 +0300 Elan Ruusamäe g...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
On 16.10.2013 17:25, qboosh wrote:
diff --git a/CUnit.spec b/CUnit.spec
index bfdfaae..abf907c 100644
--- a/CUnit.spec
+++ b/CUnit.spec
@@ -1,19 +1,26 @@
+# NOTE: due to its nature, base package is development
Hi,
I am trying to install a usable PLD Linux on a laptop. Currently I am
stuck at GDM which won't start correctly.
The X server is started, but nothing is displayed, but the syslog is
flooded with '/run/user/0/dconf': Permission denied..
It starts like this:
Oct 23 16:36:14 mobik
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:50:06 +0200
Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
I am trying to install a usable PLD Linux on a laptop. Currently I am
stuck at GDM which won't start correctly.
The X server is started, but nothing is displayed, but the syslog is
flooded with '/run/user/0/dconf
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:58:46 +0200
Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
The initial problem was not Metacity theme installed. As soon as I have
installed one the GDM starts properly from systemd.
Can you add appriopriate deps to gdm package?
Those are not direct GDM dependencies,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:31:42 +0200
Lukasz Kies kie...@pld-linux.org wrote:
2013/10/24 jajcus jaj...@pld-linux.org:
commit 82ca6ec58bb122b2c2258e0943f6d061a495ef15
Author: Jacek Konieczny j.koniec...@eggsoft.pl
Date: Thu Oct 24 10:37:33 2013 +0200
R: metacity-theme-base
Hi,
On every x86_64/i686 (multiarch) PLD desktop system I have the same
problem with installing Mesa-driver-dri-* packages:
The Mesa-driver-dri-*.i686 packages pull xorg-xserver-server-*.i686
package (because of the /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri directory), which
conflicts with
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:05:06 +0200
Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
xorg-xserver-server looks better, it is the xserver that's really
required here.
No, it is not. At least swrastr Mesa driver should be usable without any
X server. Probably other DRI drivers could be usable in some
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:48:46 +0100
Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
I like to try this distro.
Nice to hear that.
But is there no installation manual and a manual how to keep PLD
up-to-date ?
Yeah… this is kind of the way we work with PLD – people who use it
usually know well how it
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:03:03 +0100
Jakub Bogusz qbo...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:57:47PM +0100, jajcus wrote:
commit e8450def6f4213398d8738010225971179936cc5
Author: Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net
Date: Tue Nov 12 17:57:25 2013 +0100
new package
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:03:14 +0100
Jakub Bogusz qbo...@pld-linux.org wrote:
There is also some issue with blank X display (intel hardware); I'm
not sure if it's related to kernel driver, new X.org server/driver or
new gdm.
It may be the GDM problem I wrote some time ago.
Do you have
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:09:20 +0200
Michael Shigorin m...@osdn.org.ua wrote:
I haven't really succeeded in making ALT ISO images bootable from
both CD/DVD and USB Flash without duplicating kernel and initrd
for alternative EFI boot image (pretending to be a fake partition
after hybridization)
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:31:28 +0100
Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Could all owners of the intel graphics cards test 3.10.19-4 kernel
package available in th-test? I applied a patch that attempts to
fix/workaround black screen problems.
Works for me:
00:02.0 VGA compatible
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:33:26 +0200
Michael Shigorin m...@osdn.org.ua wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 08:38:59AM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Thanks for the information. I would be surprised if it boots
everywhere.
It does boot on ASUS C60M1-I motherboard in UEFI mode just fine;
BIOS mode
I have just released a new build of PLD New Rescue.
This time it is based on the current th-main packages.
https://github.com/Jajcus/pld-new-rescue/releases/tag/th-current-0.2
I have not tested this much, though.
Greets,
Jacek
___
On 12/07/13 01:41, Michael Shigorin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:12:22AM +0100, Mateusz Korniak wrote:
And memtest does not load during uefi boot.
http://memtest86.com/download.htm#free
Note that UEFI-capable V5 became proprietary, at least so far...
On 2013-12-07 01:41, Michael Shigorin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:12:22AM +0100, Mateusz Korniak wrote:
And memtest does not load during uefi boot.
http://memtest86.com/download.htm#free
Note that UEFI-capable V5 became proprietary, at least so far...
I don't think its license
Hi,
The grub 2.00 release is buggy and lacking features. And their release
cycle is ridiculous – 2.00 was released in June 2012, lots of fixes were
commited to their repository, but no new release was made.
We have some patches from Fedora. I have been trying to fix bugs by
back-porting patches
On 2014-01-01 17:28, Mateusz Korniak wrote:
On Wednesday 01 January 2014 13:41:33 Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Can any grub2 user test the package from the DEVEL branch?
Tested on laptop and workstation, works fine after fixing sysconfig/grub.
Does
Hi,
I have just released a new PLD NR built, based on the fresh Th 2013
snapshot:
https://github.com/Jajcus/pld-new-rescue/releases/tag/th2013-1.0
What is new:
– Based on the brand new 'Th 2013' snapshot
– PXE boot (both legacy and EFI)
– built with a recent GRUB snapshot
– wicd network
I am preparing 'targetcli' package for the iSCSI target configuration. I
have taken the systemd service file from Fedora, which says:
[Unit]
Description=Restore LIO kernel target configuration
Requires=sys-kernel-config.mount
After=sys-kernel-config.mount network.target local-fs.target
The
On 2014-01-05 20:31, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
I wonder how to solve that right?
– remove 'ConditionPathExists=/sys/kernel/config' and use
'ExecStartPre=modprobe configfs' instead?
It was a bit more complicated than that, but I have patched the systemd
units so the 'configfs' module
On 2014-01-15 21:11, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 15/01/14 21:45, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
My proposal is to do what Fedora does in its repo, for a retired package:
1) git delete all files in package, spec, patches, etc.
2) create dead.package file with explanation why it was retired (for
example
On 2014-01-24 21:44, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
Can you marege it to master? What we have in Th (10.0.1) is from
November 2012 and what we have on master (10.12.2) does not build.
IMO there is no point in waiting, especially if it works.
It will take months before I really test this in
On 02/21/14 15:27, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 21 of February 2014, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try out python-gevent. First, I have started with updating
the packages to the newest greenlet and gevent. And there is a problem:
a greenlet test fails with an error
On 05/05/14 14:24, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
rfc: move /etc/cron.d to filesystem package
+1
Greets,
Jacek
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
On 2014-06-12 20:04, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
$ rpm -qf /etc/skel/
pwdutils-3.2.19-2.x86_64
suggestion: move dir to filesystem package
rationale: packages providing $HOME skeletons shouldn't depend on
useradd tools
Well, $HOME skeletons _are_
Hi,
There is a problem with locale files on multiarch systems.
[jajcus@jajo ~]$ rpm -ql glibc-localedb-all-2.19-2.i686
/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive
[jajcus@jajo ~]$ rpm -ql glibc-localedb-all-2.19-2.x86_64
/usr/lib64/locale/locale-archive
One is used by 32-bit binaries and the other by 64-bit
On 06/23/14 17:00, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
The deeper question is
Why is the localedb arch dependent?
Fix the localedb implementation and you won’t have to worry
about package replacement.
I was not sure
On 06/24/14 13:11, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:57:32 +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
I think I can even move the data to /usr/share and make
glibc-localedb-all a noarch package.
No endianness issue here?
I don't know. And we currently support x86 only. But I will leave
On 02/07/14 14:03, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
Are there any reasons not to upgrade to 214?
Read the changelog.
I have just read all the release announcement since 208. A lot of useful
changes have been introduced.
It needs to be carefully cut down
On 02/07/14 21:06, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
What do you mean by 'cut down'? And what do you consider the 'bloat'.
Most the things introduced since 208 may be really useful, and the rest
won't break anything.
... that's unfortunately not true :( Right now the obstacle is networkd
and I do
Hi,
I have just prepared new PLD New Rescue images, based on the new Th snaphot.
https://github.com/Jajcus/pld-new-rescue/releases/tag/th2014-1.4
Let me know if it works for you, so I can mark it a final release.
Greets,
Jacek
___
pld-devel-en
On 2015-03-16 13:19, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:56:19 +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
??? remove '-upstart' subpackages and add 'Obsoletes: %{name}-upstart',
'Conflicts: upstart' to the corresponding packages
Wouldn't that be easier for newly cleaned-up upstart package
On 2015-04-22 17:41, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
http://git.pld-linux.org/?p=packages/python-setuptools.git;a=commitdiff;h=64c5aa5e97487c2879a621605724e4e64f85a933
blah, i do not understand what should i use in new specs
python-setuptools or python-distribute?
setuptools
i thought setuptools is
On 2015-04-22 19:47, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
On 2015-04-22 17:41, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
In the meantime another project 'distutils2' was announced, which was to
supersed both setuptools and distribute, but that didn't
101 - 200 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
