to bring up a kernel with dynamic major/minor numbers.
Meaningful symlinks, permissions and device ownership must
still be handled by userspace.
Maybe we could simplify our geninitrd?
Better not.
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/148/740255.html
--
Jan Rękorajski
-package-name/old-package-name.spec,v
new-package-name/new-package-name.spec,v
anyone against?
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
Doesn't need Provides: ruby-Package into ruby-package.spec? Why?
Because of many other package, that have ruby-Package BRs and Rs.
I added Provides tag, couldn't get myself to look for all packages that
have R:old-name ;)
--
Jan Rękorajski
-0.15.x86_64
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
in packages that provides jdk
As far as I know other distros don't package these files at all, so
there is no convention to follow.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSRCSOURCECODE
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE
be '/tmp/xxx')
ERROR: virtualenv is not compatible with this system or executable
[bagg...@sith tmp]$ rpm -q python
python-2.6.5-3.x86_64
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
%if %{with ruby18}
BuildRequires: ruby = 1.8
BuildConflicts: ruby = 1.9
%else
BuildRequires: ruby = 1.9
%endif
%{!?with_ruby18:%patch0 -p1}
this will give full control over build process.
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
it is harder.
IMO it's enough to hack the build process to just use -lcompat if
needed. What was the package that failed to build?
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
it and know how to fix it, code you pasted on irc shows
that it should be easy job.
As for FLAGS=wait ipv4 it may work in xinetd case, but it breaks both
inetd and rlinetd.
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS
as realese, see?
When I used %{release} in internal reqs then glen screamed bloody
murder (he was right BTW), so if you want to separete these macros, then
go ahead but do it in a way that does not break anything.
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:26:39 +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
What about just drop *.la and leave -static?
Would they build without .la in place?
Libraries? Of course, static libs are just plain simple ar archives of
compiled objects (compiled
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 14:21:23 +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
What about just drop *.la and leave -static?
Would they build without .la in place?
Libraries? Of course, static libs are just plain simple ar archives of
compiled objects
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 20/02/11 10:57, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:57:18PM +0100, glen wrote:
Author: glen Date: Fri Feb 18 15:57:18 2011 GMT
Module: packages
without them? python-numpy being an example.
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
Applied and rebuilt.
Thanks
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld
?
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en
scripts executed, not sourced?
for second problem allow only known extensions, or build blacklist of
backup files?
See underlined text. Fixed in SVN.
And I checked, there are only .sh files there.
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
in a subprocess won't help in this task…
Thanks for a voice of sanity. I'm touching that code so seldom, I'd make
a bad mistake :/
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
pld-cvs-com...@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatpld-linux.org
default
nsswitch.conf 5 years ago.
Revision 1.673 2007/02/05 13:07:03 arekm
- install nsswitch without db entries in it (nss_db is not in default glibc)
in that case all %post/%preun actions from openldap.spec should be
removed too?
That's something completely different.
--
Jan Rękorajski
).
if the R is indirectly via the dirs, then imho the dirs can go back to
filesystem, and people not wanting systemd can go with less unneeded
stuff installed
R is via post/preun/etc scripts and can't go away.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | http
a special case (see comment in service file),
other DBUS services are started on-demand by dbus, so I don't see the need.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld
this in apache breaks existing configs. Big time.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing
happiness, but udev = 181 _requires_ devtmpfs.
That's why it has still rel 0.1.
You both obviously didn't read the changelogs for udev, udev.spec and
rc-scripts.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
Hi,
This is a heads-up, new udev 182 that is in th-test requires mounted devtmpfs to
operate properly as it (udev = 181) does not create any nodes anymore.
Current rc.sysinit (rc-scripts = 0.4.5.3-1) do mount devtmpfs,
as does systemd.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD
[czwartek, 29 marzec 2012], Łukasz Maśko napisał(a):
Dnia środa, 28 marca 2012, Jan Rękorajski napisał:
Hi,
This is a heads-up, new udev 182 that is in th-test requires mounted
devtmpfs to operate properly as it (udev = 181) does not create any
nodes anymore. Current rc.sysinit (rc
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 29 marca 2012, Jan Rękorajski napisał:
[...]
The problem was in start_udev script.
udev-182-2 should work again.
It is not, kind of error has changed (sorry for picture quality):
http://yen.ipipan.waw.pl/~ed/udev_devtmpfs2.jpg
I
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 29 marca 2012, Jan Rękorajski napisał:
[...]
The problem was in start_udev script.
udev-182-2 should work again.
It is not, kind of error has changed (sorry for picture quality
on ftp, i.e. build in 2010, 2009.
shall
they be removed, rebuilt?
Updated and rebuilt if possible, removed iff they don't work with 2.8
and can't be fixed.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
.x86_64
gimp-plugin-lqr-0.6.1-1.x86_64
gimp-plugin-ufraw-0.18-4.x86_64
gimp-svg-2.6.12-3.x86_64
sane-frontends-1.0.14-1.x86_64
xsane-0.998-5.x86_64
I don't see a problem with 2.8rc1 on HEAD, especially when gimp.org
officially stated EOL on 2.6 line.
--
Jan Rękorajski
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
The upstream project NautilusSVN has been renamed to RabbitVCS. Can we
get our CVS module renamed or should I work on a new spec?
Package copied/renamed server-side.
cvs co packages/rabbitvcs
You can cvs rm the old package.
--
Jan Rękorajski
systemd)
Yes, binary packages names and contents should not change, udev will
still be udev and work without systemd.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld
if it is NOT vanilla
to apply patches if it IS vanilla which is not what we want,
obviously.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
- much slower than with CVS.
One level hash will greatly speedup things.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
, it's more in to the liking part than udev being bad
I, personally, would abandon our geninitrd in favor of dracut, yes it's
large, but it just works, one initrams to boot any system.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
clean-distfiles.sh
compile.sh
COPYING
dropin
fetchsrc_request
get-all-specs.sh
kde4brs.sh
kde4devel2head.sh
kde4diff.sh
kde4finddescs.sh
kde4qtbrs.sh
kdediff.sh
md5
mirrors
pear-autoup.sh
pearize.sh
pldnotify.awk
relup.sh
repackage.sh
rpm.groups
spec_utf8
What happened to them?
--
Jan Rękorajski
:
ordinal not in range(128)
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:16:17AM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Kacper Kornet wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kacper Kornet wrote:
Due to git migration, write access to packages in CVS will be disabled in
around 45 minutes.
So the official repositories of PLD
-avail what-provides OpenGL-glut-devel
2 package(s) found:
freeglut-devel-2.6.0-1.x86_64
glut-devel-3.7-22.x86_64
Thanks for the effort, but this change is not necessary.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Przemo Firszt wrote:
ChangeLog:
0.15.0 - 0.16.0
[...]
Updated and rebuilt, thanks.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
maintanace bi-weekly for th-test tree and monthly for th-ready tree.
General TODOs in usual places:
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main.txt
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready.txt
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD
Z mojej strony +1.
+1
+1
Powodzenia,
vip
PS. procedurę zakładania konta odnajdziesz w zasobach
Sprzeciw.
Nie po to wandala i trola wywaliliśmy żeby go teraz przyjmować.
Gdzie Ty byłeś przez ostatnie póltora roku?
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
be glad if KDE got into the snapshot.
Stay tuned for the updates about the future of PLD Th :)
[1] examples are xorg-xserver or widely used library soname change.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
send it to ftp before september :)
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld
glen
- up to 1.10.7
It looked different from the commits, but I still like the idea as
changelog in package is cut down, and it saves searching for the full
log.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 08/17/2012 11:18 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
It looked different from the commits, but I still like the idea as
changelog in package is cut down, and it saves searching for the full
log.
i don't understand, is this +1 for -1 for the full
Hi,
On september 1st I will make snapshot of Th line, named 2012.
it will contain the current state of main/ready/test tree (with probable
exception of KDE 4.9 as it is not fully updated).
So if you know of any problems in current package set please report
and/or fix them.
--
Jan Rękorajski
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:54:21PM +0200, baggins wrote:
commit f5afdd6ce1eddbf6f72d1d2e0d655c9bec06023d
Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org
Date: Wed Aug 22 13:41:12 2012 +0200
removed autodep patch, we don't use it for over 7
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Monday 20 of August 2012 12:39:46 Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
On september 1st I will make snapshot of Th line, named 2012.
it will contain the current state of main/ready/test tree (with probable
exception of KDE 4.9 as it is not fully updated
have any comments and proposals please say so.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 04 of September 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package set,
I want to start refreshing the distribution. This means big changes in the
near future to get PLD back
and is compatible with our
current rpm.
Instalation instructions:
0) backup rpm database in /var/lib/rpm
1) rpm -Fvh rpm* (obviously)
2) run /usr/lib/rpm/bin/dbconvert
3) run rpm --rebuilddb
[1] there is patch available, I will commit it to git today
--
Jan Rękorajski
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Instalation instructions:
0) backup rpm database in /var/lib/rpm
1) rpm -Fvh rpm* (obviously)
2) run /usr/lib/rpm/bin/dbconvert
3) run rpm --rebuilddb
That's
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Hi,
Brand new rpm 5.4.10 will be available for testing in th-test later today.
It has not been installed on our infrastructure yet, there is no poldek
for it on ftp[1
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -Uhv systemd-187-4.x86_64.rpm
systemd-libs-187-4.x86_64.rpm systemd-units-187-4.x86_64.rpm
udev-core-187-4
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 11.09.2012 13:58, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -Uhv systemd-187
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 11.09.2012 13:58, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
The problem comes from mpd and stunnel have Provides user(%{name}) and
group(%{name}), and rpm mixes RPMNS_TYPE_USER
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-5.4.10-0.12.x86_64
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
No, it's this piece of code in rpmlib lib/depends.c:~1450:
Got it …
mi = rpmtsInitIterator(ts, RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME, Name, 0);
(void
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Any idea why the code above isn't being traversed? I'm
missing something here, any help appreciated.
dep in question is of the TYPE_VERSION here, comes from
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Lukasz Kies wrote:
2012/9/4 Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 04 of September 2012, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Hi,
After making a snapshot, and having (development wise) stable package
set,
I want
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote:
commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc
Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org
Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200
- set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote:
commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc
Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote:
commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc
Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 12.09.2012 14:51, baggins wrote:
commit e9eb00afc48b027786d4fd5c23e6cff20acc8df8
Author: Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org
Date: Wed Sep 12 13:33:26 2012 +0200
- add filetriggers directory
...
%dir /var/lib/rpm
+%dir
namespaces don't overlap. */
+if (A-ns.Type != B-ns.Type) {
+ result = 0;
+ goto exit;
+}
+
/* Different names (and/or name.arch's) don't overlap. */
if (rpmdsNAcmp(A, B)) {
result = 0;
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Artur Frysiak wrote:
$ LC_ALL=C sudo rpm -Uhv systemd-187-4.x86_64.rpm
systemd-libs-187-4.x86_64.rpm systemd-units-187-4.x86_64.rpm
udev-core-187-4
, please correct me if I'm wrong here
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld
are to
be renamed to gstreamer0.10-*)
This is best choice, and it will allow us to easily drop old packages
later.
- just upgrade gstreamer-* to 1.0, drop all plugins/packages requiring
gst 0.10 not ported yet
Has someone looked what the other distros do?
--
Jan Rękorajski
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
seems github packages are case insensitive, perhaps we should limit
similarily in pld to disallow creating packages that differ just
character case?
Our policy always was to use tarball name as the package name,
regardless of case.
--
Jan
c16b5e5e3d026f4d5a8628ffcbf09f094ef22f4d to Sha1header index.
rpm: rpmdb.c:3429: rpmdbAdd: Assertion `(dlen 1) == 0' failed.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Sep 30, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
decided to write, as mmazur said in irc that for him crash occoured also
in Qt upgrade
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
That package is built from the, quite large, qt4.spec so it's hard to
spot anything there :(
Yes. I needed some understanding why some but not all packages
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
That package is built from the, quite
/49c1b881b47743e0c76eaf9158a37fd6532c111f
___
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
pld-cvs-com...@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
-notification.spec
tracker.spec
gossip.spec
gtkpod.spec
libopensync-plugin-evolution.spec
muffin.spec
pidgin.spec
planner.spec
rhythmbox.spec
silgraphite.spec
tasks.spec
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
0dbf720f5c9d29cbad8356f758a6a889 /etc/wgetrc
once again:
$ rpm -V wget
..5. c /etc/wgetrc
So, file is unchanged, yet rpm reports it as changed, and as Adam
reported this happens for any file marked as %config(), even despite
%verify(not md5). This is clearly a bug in rpm5.
--
Jan
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Adam, which bug is fixed by your 1-liner?
The original one: rpm shows bad md5 digest of files marked as
`%verify(no md5)' (config files) although they are not modified.
I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Adam Osuchowski wrote:
Jan Rękorajski wrote:
I'm afraid your patch doesn't work for me, I'm still getting bad md5
for config files:
$ rpm -V wget
..5. c /etc/wgetrc
Am I missing something?
Ok, I made investigation one more time and probably know what
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
Rebuilding ~8500 packages is not an option, unfortunately :(
Um … you managed to *build* ~8500 packages using a buggy
rpmbuild in rpm-5.4.10.
What makes *rebuilding* harder than
at least clear - one have to read the
manual if (s)he wants some special options.
What we can do in this case is to document the most usefull options
in the sysconfig files.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld
' on rpm4 and rpm5?
Jeff, will changing:
rpmdsNew(sourceH, RPMTAG_PROVIDENAME, 0);
to:
rpmdsNew(sourceH, RPMTAG_NVRA, 0);
in handleOneTrigger in lib/psm.c:~1338, give the old behaviour?
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
the need to keep old
behavior. I didn't switch to rpm5 to later reintroduce all rpm4 quirks.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
like that test-case was not hard enough.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
bunch of useful
ones from mandriva repository.
Nothing in those patches touch execution of triggers, so it must be
something in rpm5 itself that changed.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Nothing in those patches touch execution of triggers, so it must be
something in rpm5 itself that changed.
The diagnostic reasoning is faulty because it doesn't
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
Nothing in those patches touch
=d2ec8f01d4cbb82f79d8abc51f26506a58162d9c
for gory details.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en
that will break a lot of already running systems.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
And so it happens that the problem had nothing to do with database, see
http://git.pld-linux.org/?
Well it has nothing to do with Berkeley DB, but …
p=packages
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
The real problem that I was afraid to touch to avoid messing things up
is lib/rpmal.c:rpmalAllSatisfiesDepend() which seems to work on global
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Jan Rękorajski bagg...@pld-linux.org wrote:
BTW, did you look into the problem with triggers arguments?
Nope. I have yet to be convinced of what the root
cause is: all you have been telling me
that.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
bagginsatpld-linux.org
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http
cofnięcia rpm-owej bazy do
BDB 5.2, które jest dobrze wytestowane i znane z poprawnego
współdziałania z rpm-em.
Pakiety rpm, poldek i util-vserver, które leżą w th-test używają już BDB
5.2. upgrade/downgrade BDB został wytestowany i działa poprawnie.
--
Jan Rękorajski
filterout is better because it's more stright-forward. to know
which _foo_cflags you need to undefine, is extra overhead to personal
memory cells
Defining _ssp_cflags to nil is better and safer.
If those flags ever change you'll end up filtering out wrong options.
--
Jan Rękorajski
code releases of *utils
packages
If hwdata is updated regularily then IMO it'll be better to use it and
make *utils packages depend on it (udev should be an exception as it is
the main source of .hwdb).
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm
1 - 100 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
