On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
It is also difficult to maintain due to poor reporting.
Maybe you could get a reasonable ballpark estimate by looking at
traffic to htdp.org? Especially the pages that actually have book
content?
-jacob
Shriram
On Oct 13, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Eli reported that we had over 1,000,000 unique IP hits on htdp.org
for the past five years. What does this tell us? -- Matthias
Not much, but I did all the obvious things to make it a conservative
estimate. For example, I counted only hits on the book's
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't need to pass peer review :-)
A Dummies book would probably be enough to justify Scheme. Ironic perhaps?
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't need to pass peer review :-)
A Dummies book would probably be enough to justify Scheme. Ironic perhaps?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Storrs david.sto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
A Dummies book would probably be enough to justify Scheme. Ironic perhaps?
That's essentially what The Little Schemer is, except without the
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On Oct 13, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Eli reported that we had over 1,000,000 unique IP hits on htdp.org
for the past five years. What does this tell us? -- Matthias
Not much, but I did all the obvious things to make it a
Eli reported that we had over 1,000,000 unique IP hits on htdp.org for
the past five years. What does this tell us? -- Matthias
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Jacob Matthews wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
It is also difficult to
