On 26 Sep 2002 at 15:58, Fringe Ryder wrote: > At 06:48 PM 9/26/2002 -0400, David A. Desrosiers wrote: > > > Here is the URL with Alice's kind patch: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/plucker-dev@rubberchicken.org/msg01626.html > > > > And don't forget that the patch in that message is exactly the > >opposite in diff format that you'll need to make it work. He diffed them the > >wrong way (i.e. all lines with '-' should be '+' and vice versa). > > When the request came through, I dove in to test my new Python skills and > have a slightly different approach mostly-implemented against a new > get. Should I bother finishing it up? To whom would I submit it upon > completion?
Bill Janssen is maintaining the parser in CVS, and is the chap to talk to. If you (or someone else), by any chance, would like to at last create another opt-requested feature, it would be support for including/excluding alt text of images when they aren't a hyperlink: #include alt_text alt_text=1 #exclude alt_text alt_text=0 This is so that you don't have to sift though a minefield of "[img]" all over a Plucker document, which happens often when crawling a site not especially designed for handhelds. Implementation would be something along the lines of support of the option from commandline and config, like other options. When it comes time to write the "[img]" or other alt text, it would be wrapped appropriately in conditions checking for whether it is/isn't a hyperlink, and whether the config switch is on/off. Best wishes, Robert _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
