Just a quick hello - it was really nice to come to the PLUG meeting
tonight. Thanks for making me feel welcome. :)
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
The ls stands in for the -e test:
FILE_THERE=`ls m* 2/dev/null | head -1`
if [ $FILE_THERE ];
then
echo found $FILE_THERE
fi
if test $(/bin/ls m* 2/dev/null | wc -l) -gt 0; then
echo found it...
fi
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com
Actually... not to be a nit-picker, but...
1680x1050 is a 16:10 aspect ratio (which was pretty standard on widescreens
a couple/few years ago)... but now the world has moved mostly to 16:9 (so
that most all displays - TV and computer are the same, since widescreen TV's
have pretty much always
Here's a tiny computer running linux:
http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/view?q=view%3Apopulara=ZPvHwnCQeYyqpMsource=newstype=embed
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
RJ == Russell Johnson r...@dimstar.net writes:
RJ On May 6, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
For me, it is much less about aspect ratio or physical dimensions
than it is about the number of pixels. The newer models are giving
you *fewer* pixels (in particular, vertically) than they
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:12:24PM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
I fervently agree with the 4:3 minority, but there are many who
agree with the screen marketing departments instead. The reason
Sometimes I wonder how different things would be today if we had taken a
different path in developing
On Fri, 6 May 2011 21:12:08 -0600
Bill Thoen bth...@gisnet.com dijo:
Sometimes I wonder how different things would be today if we had taken
a different path in developing electronic display technology. The
original Cathod Ray Tube and its immediate descendants (oscilloscopes
and RADAR screens)
