Please pick one. They both end up in the same place.
All the duplicate emails are using up my monthly allocation of 1's. I have
plenty of 0's, but if I run out of 1's, I need to buy more on the spot
market and at the end of the month THEY GET EXPENSIVE.
Thanks!
--
Russell Senior
Ted
I am running openSuse Leap 15.4 latest and attempted to run the
https://test-videos.co.uk/bigbuckbunny/mp4-h265 video
Mozilla Firefox gets codec error and aborts
Brave, Opera, and Chrome all open the video window, then stall out.
I wonder if someone should contact the Packman people on
Try this:
Go to the following in Firefox:
https://test-videos.co.uk/bigbuckbunny/mp4-h265
Click Download on the first one - you will get the codec error
If your CPU is Kaby Lake, try that on Chrome.
If not, do it from the Debian-compiled Chromium off the link I posted and it
will work.
"Like I said the only option for Firefox, apparently, is downloading the H.265
video, transcoding it to H.264 via Ffmpeg, then viewing it in Firefox."
I'm running Linux debian 4.19.0-22-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.260-1 (2022-09-29)
x86_64 GNU/Linux with Firefox 102.5.Oesr and I can play this HEVC
Just to add to this - the Brave web browser works exactly the same as the
production Chrome browser works. (I understand it uses the Chromium engine so
maybe that is why)
It supports H.265 on a Kaby Lake and later CPU but not on a pre Kaby Lake CPU
(at least, on Windows. I'll have to test on
-Original Message-
From: PLUG On Behalf Of Paul Heinlein
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 12:06 PM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Remote work on downed server ( Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: March PLUG
Meeting: Anatomy of a Mailing List Meltdown )
>In this hypothetical
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The problem with that is that the assessment itself is biased. If a
business owner is doing the assessment they tend to bias against
cost.
But, what happens if a customer calls at the very moment your
receptionist's PC is crashed, and she says
On Ubuntu, ffmpeg and it's libraries are not installed by default, and Firefox
is installed.
However, even installing via apt install ffmpeg later, Firefox does not use
those libraries, despite the fact
that the installed ffmpeg is indeed compiled with --enable-libx265 and
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Lost opportunity cost. It's not easy to quantify so the business owners
doing the assessment on new gear tend to discount $downtimeRisk. Which is
why So many small businesses remain small, to be perfectly frank.
Ted,
It's actually called
I understand it but try explaining that to Reolink.
What it boils down to for many is either you lose $1000 on buying a new
catalytic converter when the skanks cut yours off and run off with it, or you
fork over $300 in cameras and cabling you do yourself, plus some hours on an
older PC, to
The problem with that is that the assessment itself is biased. If a business
owner is doing the assessment they tend to bias against cost.
But, what happens if a customer calls at the very moment your receptionist's PC
is crashed, and she says "sorry I can't help my computer is down"
And that
Maybe distros are different, using Archlinux
Firefox depends on ffmpeg, ffmpeg depends on libx265
[can make Chrome/Chromium unGooGled]
On 2/27/23, MC_Sequoia wrote:
> "Is it possible to get Firefox to display HEVC videos? Everything I have
> read indicates the Mozilla developers have some
Yes, I have crontab set up to start the backup early in the morning and
it works. I was investigating setting the "boot/reboot" option to backup
system type directories that might change after an update or change in
configuration that require a reboot.
Thanks for the response.
~~R
On
"Is it possible to get Firefox to display HEVC videos? Everything I have read
indicates the Mozilla developers have some religious war thing going on with
MPEG-LA and refuse to put support into Firefox for it -"
HEVC isn't supported in Firefox because it's no a license-free codec.
Some
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The Dell and HP systems require an extra license fee be paid to
enable the remote tools and most of my customers are smaller.
Their tendency is to try to press workstations into use as servers,
it's a big stretch to get them to actually buy a real
TLDR
As I said, people leave bleeding...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeJXYhdfR6Q
Ted
-Original Message-
From: PLUG On Behalf Of Ben Koenig
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 7:42 AM
To: Portland Linux/Unix Group
Subject: Re: [PLUG] ANNOUNCEMENT: March PLUG Meeting: Anatomy of a
Raised flooring went out with IBM servers, lol. Far easier to run overhead
cable management. I'm not a fan of pulling a raised floor to get at a cable
and finding a dead rat down there.
The Dell and HP systems require an extra license fee be paid to enable the
remote tools and most of my
OMG everyone needs to get over it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
This obligatory XKCD reference applies to both side of the isle...
https://xkcd.com/169/
-Ben
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, February 27th, 2023 at 7:30 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt
wrote:
> I agree this should have
I agree this should have been originally posted to plug-talk but it was not,
which is why my response was to plug and why this response is also to plug. I
am not going to accept a label of "covid denier" since I am not one, nor was I
advising people to take no precautions.
So I'm a "covid
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Richard England wrote:
But when I try to use the "At everu boot/reboot" options it seems to fail
with a permission error. The profile works if I run it "manually" but
fails on a reboot. ( I haven't tried it on a straight power-on boot.)
Richard,
I use dirvish, not
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Robert Citek wrote:
By "server", I am assuming that you mean some system on rails in a rack in
a datacenter with raised flooring, hot/cold aisles, redundant
power/networking, and physical security. In that environment, you usually
can ( and want to ) be able to work on a
One other heads up: the Portland Building is a Government Building and they
have been increasingly touchy about bringing "weapons" in. I am not sure
what kind of screening there will be, but it might include innocuous
seeming things like little pocket knives. To be safe, it's probably a good
idea
One other heads up: the Portland Building is a Government Building and they
have been increasingly touchy about bringing "weapons" in. I am not sure
what kind of screening there will be, but it might include innocuous
seeming things like little pocket knives. To be safe, it's probably a good
idea
23 matches
Mail list logo
