I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a
day from CentOS showing up on our mailing list and forums.
Any CentOS users here? I'm hoping the tales of
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:14, Keith Lofstrom kei...@kl-ic.com wrote:
I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a
day from CentOS showing up on our
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Keith Lofstrom kei...@kl-ic.com wrote:
I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a
day from CentOS showing up on
I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a
day from CentOS showing up on our mailing list and forums.
Any CentOS users here? I'm hoping the tales
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Keith Lofstrom kei...@kl-ic.com wrote:
I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are getting about 5 refugees a
day from CentOS showing up on
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
Any CentOS users here? I'm hoping the tales of woe are overblown,
and CentOS is still healthy and moving forwards. If something
happens to SL, I would rather not have RHEL as the only practical
alternative.
My best understanding of the issues
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 12:42 -0700, Larry Brigman wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Keith Lofstrom kei...@kl-ic.com wrote:
I run Scientific Linux, SL, a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone.
The most widely used clone of RHEL is CentOS, but there may be
troubles in that community. We are
alan == alan a...@clueserver.org writes:
alan The versions used are OLD. (As they are in RHEL.) There are
alan features in SSH I would like to use on my home system, but the
alan version used by CentOS is about 5 years old. If I wanted to use
alan out of date, bitrotten software I would
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:07:59PM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
Second, for CentOS developers, 100% binary compatibility is required
for a release. That means that every library and executable will have
exactly the same linking and dependencies as RHEL. Running ldd against
a library on
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
are pushing Firefox 4, which requires libstdc++.so.6 with
GLIBCXX_3.4.9 . The available libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-50.el5
RPM for RHEL 5x, CENTOS 5x, and SL 5x contains only GLIBCXX_3.4.8 .
You can read more about it here:
10 matches
Mail list logo
