"See https://www.amazon.com/Beelink-Intel-2-9Ghz-USB3-0-Type-C/dp/B09J4D6TMG/
I am trying to determine if this is a good choice for the hardware or not?"
The Opensense Hardware Sizing document is a good place to start.
https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/hardware.html
It's the second result on a
On 1/19/23 15:34, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Galen Seitz wrote:
On 1/19/23 14:47, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Jason Barnett wrote:
Page 3 of their setup guide documents how to install it. A quick
perusal
suggests that you need a licence key to use even the
OpenWrt comes with a default firewall, which you can of course modify to
your needs. The CPU required depends on the speed of the links, and what
exactly you want to do. NAT will use some cycles, but a 10 year old MIPS
based router can NAT a few hundred megabits.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 15:04
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Galen Seitz wrote:
On 1/19/23 14:47, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Jason Barnett wrote:
Page 3 of their setup guide documents how to install it. A quick perusal
suggests that you need a licence key to use even the community version.
I
could be wrong as
That hardware should be sufficient. I was running a firewall on an
old Pentium 4 box for some time, it is still sitting here waiting to
be reinstalled. The firewall I used was Untangle, it is free for
personal use, with extended features costing. Untangle is Debian
based but supplied as an
On 1/19/23 14:47, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Jason Barnett wrote:
Page 3 of their setup guide documents how to install it. A quick perusal
suggests that you need a licence key to use even the community
version. I
could be wrong as I do not use it and only spent about 30
To all:
If possible I would like to talk privately to anyone who has installed a
Linux Firewall, preferably OPNsense, onto a linux box as right now I am
trying to get up to speed on firewall issues and current
state-of-the-art. I am considering using a Beelink mini-pc as the
platform, but it
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Paul Goins wrote:
Seems like this was intentional due to a Debian bug at the time. Note this
from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/amd64/bacula:
Removed from disk on 2022-07-23.
Removal requested on 2021-12-08.
Deleted on 2021-12-08 by Steve Langasek
FTBFS, removed from
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Jason Barnett wrote:
Page 3 of their setup guide documents how to install it. A quick perusal
suggests that you need a licence key to use even the community version. I
could be wrong as I do not use it and only spent about 30 seconds in
researching it.
Seems like this was intentional due to a Debian bug at the time. Note this
from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/amd64/bacula:
Removed from disk on 2022-07-23.
Removal requested on 2021-12-08.
Deleted on 2021-12-08 by Steve Langasek
FTBFS, removed from Debian testing, blocks libssl transition;
Page 3 of their setup guide documents how to install it. A quick perusal
suggests that you need a licence key to use even the community version. I
could be wrong as I do not use it and only spent about 30 seconds in
researching it.
https://bacula.org/whitepapers/CommunityInstallationGuide.pdf
I am stumped at Ubuntu's package offerings for Bacula, a widely used
backup utility. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS had version 9.0.6. 20.04 LTS has
9.4.4. 22.04 LTS has absolutely no Bacula packages other than (of all
things) bacula-doc. And 22.10 (not LTS) has version 9.6.7.
The LTS distros are more
Ben,
I started migrating from Gmail to ProtonMail a few years ago, bought a paid
plan, and parked my domain with them.
I switched to Fastmail about four months ago, because proton mail does not
support Mutt, or any email client without their local decryption bridge
installed (no support for
13 matches
Mail list logo
