>>>>> especially with the push to "Panoramic WiFi". A member of
>>>>>>>>>>> CentryLink who
>>>>>>>>>>> was also on the call (ISP InfoSec sharing/working group) mentioned
>>>>>>>>>>>
t;>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There was a collective groan among the engineers when another ISP
>>>>>>>>>> spoke up about the number of critical flaws they find in their DOCIS
>>>>>>>>>>
t;>>>>>> of 40
>>>>>>>>> (really 5 teams of 8) that simply monitor and ensure that the OSPF
>>>>>>>>> functions properly among the various models and brands to make sure
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>
gt;>>>>> I talked with Alexander this afternoon, and it looks like he has a
>>>>>>>> functioning network again. The APs were reluctant to give up their old
>>>>>>>> configuration, so a factory reset and new DHCP leases seem to have
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> CL sells you a dsl modem/router that does your local security
>>>>>>> whether you want it or not, full router/nat/firewall, and probably
>>>>>>> spyware. Making it a modem is possible, but takes work, and your
>>
gt;>>
>>>>>> -mb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 1:53 PM Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss <
>>>>>> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I Owned a
y, unless you
>>>>>>> get a bundled router/modem, which is only what CenturyLink sells. If
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> got a "router/modem" combo, just buy a modem-only device for a dumb
>>>>>>> bri
wned one as I always have my own router/firewall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -mb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:36 AM Donald Mac McCarthy
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>
gt;>
>>>>>> Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss wrote on 5/3/20 2:00 PM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cox modems will learn and allow only 1 mac at a time (unless business
>>>>>> is set to allow more, but not on residential). If switching out
>>>>
t;>> I assigned the SFP+ port as my LAN and assigned it the 10.x.x.x/16
>>>>>> network. Then I had to call COX and list the WAN Mac address with them.
>>>>>> Upon doing so I was able to reach external sites, and all downstream
>>>>>> devices started
t;>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my Galaxy S10+
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2020, 03:14 Herminio Hernandez, Jr. via PLUG-discuss <
>>>>> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
display with a keyboard, you can use that for
>> configuration and modify a different device
>> at the same time.
>>
>> Makes it easier to troubleshoot by giving you
>> the ab
ll outbound
>>>>> traffic should NAT to the FW WAN interface and there should be a default (
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0) route to the internet.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Seabass via PLUG-discuss <
>>>>> plug-discuss@
.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Seabass via PLUG-discuss <
>>>> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm with Mac, I think it is not the firewall, but if you have the
>>>>> ability to p
>>> configuration and modify a different device at the same time.
>>>>
>>>> Makes it easier to troubleshoot by giving you the ability to configure
>>>> your pfSense ports at the same time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
eshoot by giving you the ability
> to configure your pfSense ports at the same time.
>>
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
>> From: Donald Mac McCarthy > <mailto:m
erent device at the same time.
>>>
>>> Makes it easier to troubleshoot by giving you the ability to configure
>>> your pfSense ports at the same time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
>>&
rts at the same time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
>> From: Donald Mac McCarthy
>> To: "Snyder, Alexander J via PLUG-discuss"
>>
>> Subject: Re: pfSense + Ubiquity
>> Message-ID: <18adfa
asier to troubleshoot by giving you the ability to configure
> your pfSense ports at the same time.
>
>
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
> From: Donald Mac McCarthy
> To: "Snyder, Alexander J via PLUG-discuss"
>
> Subject: Re: pfSens
ability to configure
> your pfSense ports at the same time.
>
>
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
> From: Donald Mac McCarthy
> To: "Snyder, Alexander J via PLUG-discuss"
>
> Subject: Re: pfSense + Ubiquity
> Message-ID: <18adfa38-3e
at the same time.
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 09:04:35 -0700
> From: Donald Mac McCarthy
> To: "Snyder, Alexander J via PLUG-discuss"
>
> Subject: Re: pfSense + Ubiquity
> Message-ID: <18adfa38-3e72-7b0a-e31a-1ddf175d7...@oscontext.com>
> Content-Typ
I can help - but I am unavailable to do so until tomorrow.
Make sure there are not any thing other than default VLANs on the
interfaces to start with. Ubiquiti is famous for not havinght eSFP+
ports active in the default configuration, and I believe the switch has
all the ports to shutdown on
Does anyone out there have experience with pfSence and Ubiquity switches?
I have zero with either but that didn't stop me from buying both how
hard could it be?! LOL.
I bought a Negate XG-1537-1U. I bought a Unifi Pro 24 PoE switch.
I can configure the FW immediately after
23 matches
Mail list logo
