The recommendation is to segregate the devices. Not just stick them in
another subnet, and not to put them in another segment with what needs
to talk to them being dual-homed with routing preference. There should
be a device which can handle ACLs between the IoT devices and the
remainder of the
@Michael - to remedy this, I've seen customers deploy things like super
flat topologies with VPLSs to tie it all together. It's always fun to have
to increase someones's mac table size as their apple TVs were edging out
their DHCP servers. I know you're paying me to do this, but an obligatory
On 2019-12-09 19:39, Michael Butash wrote:
Linux networkmanager will assign a higher metric on non-ethernet
interfaces (ideally) to de-preference wireless over wired, but they
still both get an address. In the same subnet, the metric is what
determines preference. You can tweak metrics, but
On 2019-12-09 13:48, kitepi...@kitepilot.com wrote:
Matt Graham writes:
I think I turned on both wired and wireless networking
on my laptop at some point, and it didn't break
everything. [...] This is *not* recommended, but it
should not be the horrible failure you got in the
2000s if you had 2
Some additional comment on this, as been there...
Linux networkmanager will assign a higher metric on non-ethernet interfaces
(ideally) to de-preference wireless over wired, but they still both get an
address. In the same subnet, the metric is what determines preference.
You can tweak metrics,
OK, I'll narrow this down:
We will have a router serving the same subnet in wireless and wire.
We'll have a laptop with 2 interfaces, wifi0 and eth0.
We'll not do any routing configuration beyond a default.
Finally, this explanation is watered down to dilution because I don't have a
lot of time
On 2019-12-07 14:20, kitepi...@kitepilot.com wrote:
Mark Phillips writes:
dd-wrt router (ASUS RT_N16) would do this. I then
noticed that the firmware was over 2 years old, so I thought, I
should
upgrade the firmware. Long story short, I may have bricked my router.
My question is, can I run
You *HAVE* to configure different subnets in each interface or you'll have a
chaos.
My question is, can I run the wifi on on domain (192.168.25.x)
and my wired connection on another domain (192.168.1.x)?
Yes, reason above.
ET
Mark Phillips writes:
So, I started Friday with this bit of
So, I started Friday with this bit of reading...FBI recommends that you
keep your IoT devices on a separate network https://flip.it/oNLAtK and
thought I would see if my dd-wrt router (ASUS RT_N16) would do this. I then
noticed that the firmware was over 2 years old, so I thought, I should
upgrade
In some places they even have fiber to the prem. (me)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:02 PM Michael Butash wrote:
> You need to make sure your modem supports 3.1 too, don't forget that.
>
> Cox has just recently finished upgrading to all the new 3.1 hardware here,
> and phoenix tends to be their
You need to make sure your modem supports 3.1 too, don't forget that.
Cox has just recently finished upgrading to all the new 3.1 hardware here,
and phoenix tends to be their technology leader market due to being their
biggest, so I'd be surprised if comcast has done more rural areas. They
2 Questions:
Are you positive your area has been migrated to DOCSIS 3.1?
Are you considering moving to an area w/ Cox services as a result?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:59 AM Stephen Partington
wrote:
> Not in my experience.
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 10:01 PM Jim wrote:
>
>> I found out Tuesday
Not in my experience.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 10:01 PM Jim wrote:
> I found out Tuesday what was causing me to not get the speed I was told
> I should get. Once again the Comcast guy I was talking to said he
> wanted to send out a repairman to find out why I wasn't getting the 150
> Mbps
I found out Tuesday what was causing me to not get the speed I was told
I should get. Once again the Comcast guy I was talking to said he
wanted to send out a repairman to find out why I wasn't getting the 150
Mbps everything told him I should be getting. Tuesday morning the
repairman showed
On 09/06/2018 12:20 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
Levels seem decent, so doesn't seem to be an issue with the transport.
Have you tried bypassing your router and dhcp direct to the internet?
I've heard older consumer routers are having a hard time keeping up
with now typical 100mbps speeds,
Levels seem decent, so doesn't seem to be an issue with the transport.
Have you tried bypassing your router and dhcp direct to the internet? I've
heard older consumer routers are having a hard time keeping up with now
typical 100mbps speeds, maybe it's just getting long in the tooth there too.
On 09/05/2018 09:34 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
How exactly are you testing your connection? That's a relevant bit
regarding networking. If testing in phoenix, test a LA
California-based server, as most cox residential egresses there. I
like Race Communications out of LA to test against on
Agreed, if comcast provides a testing server, test against that first. Cox
did before, not sure about recently, but speedtest.net isn't bad to use to
test either if you pick a correct server. They tend to want to test you
against your locale, but as stated, understanding your isp peering egrees
I know for a fact I have a 1gbps connection.
And o e of the issues I ran into is that the ethernet connection between
the edge device and my ONT would occasionally freak out and drop to
100mbps.
I ha e also found that not all edge devices are created equal. I have had
several devices that at one
How exactly are you testing your connection? That's a relevant bit
regarding networking. If testing in phoenix, test a LA California-based
server, as most cox residential egresses there. I like Race Communications
out of LA to test against on speedtest.net. Anything else hits interstate
’ is probably
right. I’ve heard of dumber things….
From: PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf
Of Jim
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 2:29 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
Subject: Re: networking question
On 09/05/2018 01:18 PM, Carruth, Rusty wrote
On 2018-09-05 14:29, Jim wrote:
On 09/05/2018 01:18 PM, Carruth, Rusty wrote:
First, the last question - yes, someone decided it was better to
not have eth0 any more, so now they are those weird enp4s1 names.
Who are the idiots that change things for the hell of it?
The change to the new
explain the sudden 100MBs limit)
From: PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf
Of Jim
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 1:13 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
Subject: networking question
Back in June comcast raised my connection speed to 150Mbps. Two weeks
Back in June comcast raised my connection speed to 150Mbps. Two weeks
ago it went back down to 100. I called to complain and was told I was
supposed to be getting 100Mbps. I finally got someone to admit that my
connection speed should be 150, but I'm still getting 100.
I didn't make any
What does:
ip addr show
shows?
Is there a cble plugged to that interface?
ET
Mark Phillips writes:
My Debian testing laptop running gnome has two interfaces - eth0 and wlan0.
When I switch to wlan0, the routing table has an entry for eth0, so I
cannot access my local network.
25 matches
Mail list logo
