Thanks to everyone who replied.
I should have mentioned that I am back on line and my static IP is working. I
just found it odd that Cox would offer a different IP than the one I am
assigned if I did not set my router up for a static IP. I assumed that when my
router asked for the IP Cox
they also require a nic to be
registered before it can be used?
On 8/31/2012 8:33, keith smith wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replied.
I should have mentioned that I am back on line and my static IP is
working. I just found it odd that Cox would offer a different IP than
the one I am
From: Derek Trotter expat.arizo...@gmail.com
Since they [the ISP] already know what cable modem you're using,
why do they also require a NIC [behind the cable modem] to be
registered before it can be used?
IIRC, the original reason was money. The ISP would allow the cablemodem to
transmit to
On 8/31/2012 12:21, Matt Graham wrote:
From: Derek Trotter expat.arizo...@gmail.com
Since they [the ISP] already know what cable modem you're using,
why do they also require a NIC [behind the cable modem] to be
registered before it can be used?
IIRC, the original reason was money. The ISP
It's mostly that ARIN requires justification for ipv4 addresses now more
than ever. When cox, or anyone, asks for more ipv4 addresses, they want
literal records of utilization, unique ownership per customer (usually
something obfuscated, no pii), and must meet at least 90% utilization
Hi,
Last night, after 6 years of good loyal service, my D-Link router died. I just
happened to have a never used 2 year old Netgear router in my closet. I hooked
it up and everything was fine at first. I have a static IP and it changed. I
called Cox and was told I needed to configure my
a static
IP and it changed. I called Cox and was told I needed to configure my
router to tell them what my IP is. I'm not a network guru, so this hit
me kind of strange. I thought they assigned IP's.
Any thoughts on this are much appreciated.
Keith Smith
years of good loyal service, my D-Link router died. I
just happened to have a never used 2 year old Netgear router in my closet.
I hooked it up and everything was fine at first. I have a static IP and it
changed. I called Cox and was told I needed to configure my router to tell
them what my IP
-Link router
died. I just happened to have a never used 2 year old Netgear
router in my closet. I hooked it up and everything was fine at
first. I have a static IP and it changed. I called Cox and was told
I needed to configure my router to tell them what my IP is. I'm
Hiya,
XBMC (X Box Media Center) is a big part of the Sabayon 5.6 distro.
I have no cable to connect to, so I don't know if this is a solution.
-
Subject: Cox Cable TV
From: doc_me...@yahoo.com
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:42:44 -0700
I think I
cranky with 1080p mkv's occasionally, but otherwise
works pretty well.
-mb
On 07/23/2012 07:24 PM, ChasM Marshall wrote:
Hiya,
XBMC (X Box Media Center) is a big part of the Sabayon 5.6 distro.
I have no cable to connect to, so I don't know if this is a solution.
-
Subject: Cox Cable TV
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:42:44 -0700
From: Scott doc_me...@yahoo.com
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Cox Cable TV
Message-ID: 1342633364.13941.2.camel@versed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I think I know the answer to this, but I'll ask anyway
a CableCard from Cox, and a Tuning Adapter
to put in line with it to ensure I get all the channels. The HDHR does
list all of the channels to which I'm subscribed, so I know that part is
working. However, almost all of the channels show up with a copy once
flag attached. My understanding from Internet
We've just puchased Cox Business Internet and I have been assigned a CIDR
block. I have no experience with this. In the past I've been assigned a range
of IPs that I basically forward from the external interface through the
internal interface using iptables on a dedicated Linux box. I have
On 07/07/2011 04:38 PM, lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.com wrote:
We've just puchased Cox Business Internet and I have been assigned a
CIDR block. I have no experience with this. In the past I've been
assigned a range of IPs that I basically forward from the external
interface through
-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Kevin Fries
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:51 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Cox CIDR block configuration
On 07/07/2011 04:38 PM,
lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.commailto:lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.com wrote:
We've just puchased Cox Business
On 07/07/2011 05:05 PM, lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.com wrote:
So are you saying I should just change all my external interfaces to
the CIDR address and forward them the way I've been doing to the
LANs? I tried that and had no luck. Don't I need some interface to
the static ip?
CIDR is just
Cox says that they route the 24. CIDR through the 70. static though so it
sounds like they have already done the routing. Do I need to do something else?
They said I need a special router with 2 WAN ports.
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun
and purposes.
Can anyone else with Cox Business Class confirm that? I have only set up
Cox at home for my mom.
Kevin
On Jul 7, 2011 5:24 PM, lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.com
lkrawc...@amhealthgroup.com wrote:
Cox says that they route the 24. CIDR through the 70. static though so it
sounds like
Correct...
The full block is what you want to use.
Ask for the complete router allocation sheet from Cox to be sure which are
unusable depending on subnetting.
http://support.coxbusiness.com/sdccommon/asp/contentredirect.asp?sprt_cid=7ec0f78e-f10d-4074-8375-655c64c08a6d#faq21
On Thu, Jul 7
but idk about your wife.
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Bryan O'Neal bryan.on...@theonealandassociates.com wrote:
From: Bryan O'Neal bryan.on...@theonealandassociates.com
Subject: MythTV - Cox supported cable cards
To: Arizona State University Linux Users Group asu...@asu.edu, Main PLUG
discussion list
Ok - So I am thinking about building a myth box from an old 2GHz duel
core pc. I have hanging around. So questions
1) Does myth support Cox cable cards (Windows Media Center does)
2) Does myth work well with Hulu+ and Netflix?
3) How easy is it to set up? I am thinking about dropping in a 2TB
Am 24. Mar, 2011 schwätzte keith smith so:
moin moin,
I'm thinking of moving from consumer cable to business cable with Cox.
It's a good move.
Currently I have an Internet connection that is shared with up to 349 others
with a max of up to 20mb/sec down. Not sure what up is, might
: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of keith
smith
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:47 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: OT: Moving from Cox Consumer to Cox Business Internet and Phone
Hi,
I'm thinking
Hi,
I'm thinking of moving from consumer cable to business cable with Cox.
Currently I have an Internet connection that is shared with up to 349 others
with a max of up to 20mb/sec down. Not sure what up is, might be 2mb/sec. I
have a consumer phone line and distinct ringing for my fax
klsmith2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking of moving from consumer cable to business cable with Cox.
Currently I have an Internet connection that is shared with up to 349
others with a max of up to 20mb/sec down. Not sure what up is, might be
2mb/sec. I have a consumer phone line and distinct
themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and
will heal their land.
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Moving from Cox Consumer to Cox Business
I'm on Cox cable for internet and paying for their Premiere package
(20MBit down, 2MBit up). Over the past day or so I've seen my torrent
uploads go from respectable to abysmal; I'm lucky if I can upload at
over 10kB/s now. I've reset both my model and router several times and
that hasn't
Note, I think cox has rolled a policy to slow down certain traffic
during peak load/times to prevent a detrimental effect on the network.
then at off peak times will go back up (or supposed to)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Joe li...@joefleming.net wrote:
I'm on Cox cable for internet
Yup its Cox, not you. One of my friends ditched cox for that reason, and they
owned up to it.
--Original Message--
From: Joe
Sender: Plug
To: Plug
ReplyTo: Plug
Subject: OT: Cox slowing torrents?
Sent: Nov 13, 2009 8:28 AM
I'm on Cox cable for internet and paying for their Premiere
It's not only cox, I have qwest, and my torrents have gone from 150k to
50-20k
It seem to have started in november.
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Friday, November 13
be a blanket
policy to slow everything down.
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Stephen
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:02 AM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: OT: Cox slowing
I signed up for a Cox Business account at my home and I don't get any of
their residential restrictions. I have 2Mb/384Kb backed with an SLA and it
costs a few dollars more than residential (Approx $60/month), but the
support is stellar and I can run servers on my dedicated connection. Worth
I have qwest, but haven't really noticed this. I was getting steady
600+mB/s down yesterday. 100+mB/s up today.
I think I have 7mb plan. That's asymmetric though, and I don't really
know what up BW is supposed to be.
Bob Elzer wrote:
It's not only cox, I have qwest, and my torrents have gone
couldn't get anything up over 10kBps. I've had Cox for over a year
now and it's the first time I've have any issue like that.
I changed my ports around and checked some sites and none of the tests
came back positive for filtering. Now, all of a sudden, I'm back up to
120kBps again. I still have
was chugging along maintaining
about 120-140kBps up as usual and all of a sudden everything dropped off
and I couldn't get anything up over 10kBps. I've had Cox for over a year
now and it's the first time I've have any issue like that.
I changed my ports around and checked some sites and none
to be running ok now though.
-Joe
Sean Parsons wrote:
I signed up for a Cox Business account at my home and I don't get any of
their residential restrictions. I have 2Mb/384Kb backed with an SLA and it
costs a few dollars more than residential (Approx $60/month), but the
support is stellar and I can run
and refused to come back.
Seems to be running ok now though.
-Joe
Sean Parsons wrote:
I signed up for a Cox Business account at my home and I don't get any of
their residential restrictions. I have 2Mb/384Kb backed with an SLA and it
costs a few dollars more than residential (Approx $60/month
and give you new ones
with no notice. They might give you 2 day notice, but that's not enough
time for DNS to propagate and they don't remember that Cox used to ignore
TTL and cache all DNS for two weeks.
A friend has been on the residential service since it was first available
many years ago. He's had
This may be a complete coincidence, but yesterday and this morning my cox
service has been going up and down. I had 3 outages yesterday and one this
morning. Each lasted for 10-30 minutes.
Mark
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
That sounds very much like they're working on the network. Hold on
tight. ;)
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Mark Phillips wrote:
This may be a complete coincidence, but yesterday and this morning my cox
service has been going up and down. I had 3 outages yesterday and one this
morning. Each lasted
ftp instead of p2p.
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:10 AM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Cox slowing torrents?
I realize they have
It's because you are talking about them :-)
They're trying to censor you, use code words. Cox = Wally.
Wally is throttling P2P
LOL
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Mark
If you want a stable connection with static IPs consider DSL with a local
ISP like Deru. You don't need a local ISP if you don't want to run
services, but you should go with a local ISP anyway :).
Only downside here is you have to deal with qwest, even if it is the
local ISP doing the dealing.
the price, to
me. Try getting help Sunday 0600 from COX regular. Support for me is
24/7 and guaranteed to resolve or they start paying me $$, SLAs are the only
way to got.
I'd love more bandwidth, but cant afford the $$$.
Sean Parsons
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun
off
and I couldn't get anything up over 10kBps. I've had Cox for over a year
now and it's the first time I've have any issue like that.
I changed my ports around and checked some sites and none of the tests
came back positive for filtering. Now, all of a sudden, I'm back up to
120kBps
bang for the buck. They just released the linux drivers for the
HDMI card last month, so I haven't had a chance to play with them yet.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe j...@nationnet.com wrote:
Is anyone recording HD from their Cox digital converter box? If so, what
hardware works for you
Is anyone recording HD from their Cox digital converter box? If so, what
hardware works for you. I can record the un-encrypted channels, but I
would like to records from the converter box since there are more HD
channels there. Also friends keep asking me if Myth will work with
DirectTV and I
enough for only about 300 you can get a huge array of inputs:
http://www.decklink.com/products/decklink/
and it even has Linux support
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joej...@nationnet.com wrote:
Is anyone recording HD from their Cox digital converter box? If so, what
hardware works for you. I
So I finally got tired of dealing with this speed degradation issue
plaguing me since ubuntu hardy, and decided to put some work in on
figuring out what the issue was, and I think I have. Since this issue
seems apparent in literally anyone I've tried using Ubuntu on a Cox
network (and some
in literally anyone I've tried using Ubuntu on a Cox
network (and some of you substantiated), I think this probably would
apply to most of you on this list. I suspect the problem isn't limited
only to ubuntu, but don't have other distro's to test with. Anyways...
The primary issue
This may have very little to do with what you are experiencing. I also ran
into a sudden and sharp decrease in download speed from cox about a month
ago. I called cox, and they said there were no problems on their side. After
some further investigation on my own, I discovered that cox had changed
...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Michael
Butash
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 10:45 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Cox general speed issues
Hi all,
I'm curious, has anyone seen speed issues with cox lately or in about the
past 6 months in general? I ask, because I have
modems, and I'd then be pretty much in spectrum of my own
until modems became more readily available.
Now this is crappy as that means everyone is screwed until either they
fix this regression in legacy technology, or we all upgrade. While I'm
sure Cox and Motorola would love this, I'd rather love
for killing p2p), but I've been told their in bypass
because of the general consumer backlash against other said isp's. Cox
is still trying to figure out QoS, so it wouldn't surprise me they just
have something screwed up.
-mb
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:20 -0700, Bob Elzer wrote:
What kind of user
Hey, what constitutes a fairly heavy/heavy user with Cox cable?
I have the highest tier availbable (20mb/sec?) and have managed to dl many
tb's worth of data in the last 6 months since switching to that tier. i
haven't been rate-limited yet though...
btw, im in southwest chandler (10 and 202
Terabytes? If that's accurate and not an exaggeration, then Cox is
letting you slide. Do NOT be surprised if they throw a ToS complaint
against you at a moment's notice. According to their published limits,
you can dl only 60 gigabytes/mo. That's 720 GB a year... so if you
really
? If that's accurate and not an exaggeration, then Cox is
letting you slide. Do NOT be surprised if they throw a ToS complaint
against you at a moment's notice. According to their published limits,
you can dl only 60 gigabytes/mo. That's 720 GB a year... so if you
really are consuming TBs in 1/2 year
Hi all,
I'm curious, has anyone seen speed issues with cox lately or in about
the past 6 months in general? I ask, because I have a completely
reproducible issue, where with ubuntu, doing an apt-get of any server,
on any mirror around the world, I get all downloads that start very
fast
Sir Light wrote:
Mark,
When I went online with COX, one thing above all else is that I knew I MUST,
let me scream that LOUDLY again, ***MUST*** have a firewall in place.
Why? Simple...
To stop people from coming into my network with things I do NOT want like
viruses, people trying
Some of the comments on my earlier thread got me thinking about network
security and Cox. One of the thoughts in my earlier thread (Need Advice on
Routers), seemed to indicate that IPcop/Smoothwall were better choices than
a Linksys SOHO router because they provide better control and network
and Cox. One of the thoughts in my earlier thread (Need Advice on
Routers), seemed to indicate that IPcop/Smoothwall were better choices than
a Linksys SOHO router because they provide better control and network
security. It made me wonder. My network is one subnet on Cox's network. What
levels
Mark,
When I went online with COX, one thing above all else is that I knew I MUST,
let me scream that LOUDLY again, ***MUST*** have a firewall in place.
Why? Simple...
To stop people from coming into my network with things I do NOT want like
viruses, people trying to hack into my boxes, all
Mark,
When I went online with COX, one thing above all else is that I knew I MUST,
let me scream that LOUDLY again, ***MUST*** have a firewall in place.
Why? Simple...
To stop people from coming into my network with things I do NOT want like
viruses, people trying to hack into my boxes, all
This morning our email clients could no longer reach our Goggle Apps
mail accounts. Connection to the Google server is via IMAP to
imap.gmail.com on port 993. Mail applications simply time out
reaching the server.
Cox support claims it's not their problem. Google gives support via
forums. Had
Alan Dayley wrote:
This morning our email clients could no longer reach our Goggle Apps
mail accounts. Connection to the Google server is via IMAP to
imap.gmail.com on port 993. Mail applications simply time out
reaching the server.
Cox support claims it's not their problem. Google gives
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Charles Jones
charles.jo...@ciscolearning.org wrote:
I'm on Cox.
$ telnet imap.gmail.com 993
Trying 74.125.47.111...
Connected to imap.gmail.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet close
Connection closed.
Thanks, Charles. I get the same result
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Alan Dayley ala...@consultpros.com wrote:
Thanks, Charles. I get the same result with telnet. But the email
clients can't seem to get there.
I'm going to try another client on my machine, just for fun. :^)
Ok, problem must be on my end. A fresh install
...@consultpros.com wrote:
This morning our email clients could no longer reach our Goggle Apps
mail accounts. Connection to the Google server is via IMAP to
imap.gmail.com on port 993. Mail applications simply time out
reaching the server.
Cox support claims it's not their problem. Google gives support via
I tend not to believe this kind of thing, considering it fear mongering...
is this legit?
On Jan 29, 2009 3:54 PM, Stephen P Rufle stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
There was an interesting article in Wired about Comcast seems they had
to learn how to be an ISP instead of a dumb pipe Cable TV
that we don't do false advertising (in fact most of our
customers are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having seen
how journalists makeup overblown aviation news for the sake of yellowish
journalism
are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having
seen
how journalists makeup overblown aviation news for the sake of yellowish
journalism (or sometimes blatant ignorance of the subject and laziness to
get
the traffic spikes, we have to manage.
Let me state in here that we don't do false advertising (in fact most of our
customers are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having seen
how journalists
state in here that we don't do false advertising (in fact most of
our
customers are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having
seen
how journalists makeup overblown aviation news for the sake
to manage.
Let me state in here that we don't do false advertising (in fact most of
our
customers are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having
seen
how journalists makeup overblown aviation news
advertising (in fact most of
our
customers are word-of-mouth), and we explain people that we shape the
line.
I am not defending Cox and I don't know what they are doing, but having
seen
how journalists makeup overblown aviation news for the sake of
yellowish
journalism (or sometimes
I think the problem Cox is trying to address is inherent in their
technology, namely that customers share bandwidth. DSL doesn't have this
issue (DSL has finer grained control). That's my understanding at any rate.
Sharkscott wrote:
I agree Shawn, I like your idea, I don't download THAT much
If my info is right, your right. ;-) For cox it only goes down to the node,
half a street or a whole or half a apartment complexes..I think..
Scott
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
I think the problem Cox is trying to address is inherent in their
technology
...@shubes.net wrote:
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
Subject: Re: [Article] Cox ready to throttle P2P, non time sensitive traffic
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 7:34 AM
I think the problem Cox is trying to address is inherent
discussion list
Subject: Re: [Article] Cox ready to throttle P2P, nontime sensitive
traffic
I think that this is being taken out of context...
I manage a small wireless network with around a hundred victims...
er...
CUSTOMERS!:)
Being a wireless network, we face challenges that wired networks
I only use Cox for the net, and I have to say,
coming from the Chicago area and dealing with Comcast, Cox is
exponentially better. It's great being able to use bittorrent again and
actually download things over HTTP at speeds worth paying $50-60/mo
for. You guys bitch a lot about Cox, and I
...@kitepilot.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:45 AM
To: stephen.p.ru...@cox.net; Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: [Article] Cox ready to throttle P2P, nontime sensitive
traffic
I think that this is being taken out of context...
I manage a small wireless network with around a hundred victims...
er
Of
kitepi...@kitepilot.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:45 AM
To: stephen.p.ru...@cox.net; Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: [Article] Cox ready to throttle P2P, non"time sensitive"
traffic
I think that this is being taken out of context...
I manage a small wireless network w
There was an interesting article in Wired about Comcast seems they had
to learn how to be an ISP instead of a dumb pipe Cable TV provider
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-02/mf_brianroberts
We as a group are VERY vocal minority. Most people would not even know
or even be effected
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss
i think overall its bs... because it now will bend over legit users and useages
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Anthony Boynes aboy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up
Boynes aboy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing
, Cox is raising their rates another $3.00/month
as well. I received the letter 2 days ago.
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:06 -0700, Stephen P Rufle wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
Anthony Boynes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:06 -0700, Stephen P Rufle wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
Google Fans Net Neutrality Flames with Web Measurement Lab...
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Web-Services-Web-20-and-SOA/Google
Anthony Boynes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list
, Stephen P Rufle
stephen.p.ru...@cox.net wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/cox-opens-up-throttle-for-p2p-non-time-sensitive-traffic.ars
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe
Sharkscott wrote:
Its all about control, always has been. Its not like they can't, or
don't already. They decide when they want too, and what they will throttle.
Control..that's all.
It is *their* network. I hate depending on them, though. I have very few
good things to say about Cox
.
Hauppauge seems to make the best tuners.
For Digital channels, it means that you can pick up the clear QAM
channels offered by Cox.
This link show what channels are available.
http://www.landlpcservices.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=748
Note that the only HD channels offered by Cox are the same ones
results: I can watch TV via the
S-Video signal via the cable box using TVTime perfectly fine - this of
course makes DVR functionality rather difficult however.
My question is, has anyone had any better luck with Cox and their TV
Card? I only have around $80-90 to spend, else I'd go with the pcHDTV
HD
PCTV HD and Hauppage WinTV-DVR-1250 are the
cards, and of course I had similar results: I can watch TV via the
S-Video signal via the cable box using TVTime perfectly fine - this of
course makes DVR functionality rather difficult however.
My question is, has anyone had any better luck with Cox
PCTV HD and Hauppage WinTV-DVR-1250 are the
cards, and of course I had similar results: I can watch TV via the
S-Video signal via the cable box using TVTime perfectly fine - this of
course makes DVR functionality rather difficult however.
My question is, has anyone had any better luck with Cox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenDNS does lookup hijacking. If you want Firefox to do a google lookup
when the domain resolution fails openDNS is not for you.
Lisa Kachold wrote:
| Cox allowed recursive lookups and non-auth responses which opens
| their servers up to DNS cache
Hey,
I don't know much about them using fiber optic (it seems you have to
have the premium plan to have that), but I do know about their
internet for I do use cox. It is a good idea to have a firewall
(hardware at least) because the thing is you are sharing the
connection with other
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
