Lisa Kachold wrote:
TrueCrypt is now Detectable http://www.forensicinnovations.com/blog/?p=7
Sorry Charley! not quite so fast. I have checked the tool as detailed
on the site above and even tried a few tests.
the results were inconclusive at best. the tool (as described) could not
reliably
detection != decryption.
I'm filing this one in the FUD/misinformation department.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lisa Kachold lisakach...@obnosis.comwrote:
Ah, you guys?
This is about the ability to determine if:
1) a header has been encrypted
2) a drive has an encrypted partition
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ryan Rix phrkonale...@gmail.com wrote:
detection != decryption
Except they can then beat the password out of you, aka rubber hose decryption.
Jim
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase rubber hose decryption means;
in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that
phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not
familiar with.
...sorta timely, since there is all kinds of ruckus going on in the
Yeah, that's why TrueCrypt's ability to hide the volume on a device is
so awesome. The idea is, people don't realize anything is even there to
BE encrypted.
One thing I was reading about with regard to plausible deniability is to
hide your volumes inside of other files. For example, I have a jump
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mike Schwartz mike.l.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase rubber hose decryption means;
in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that
phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not
I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible
to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since
TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS
detection).
The idea, more than anything, is that I can say I have no idea what the
extra file
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Joe wrote:
I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible
to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since
TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS
detection).
The idea, more than anything, is that I can
TrueCrypt is now Detectable http://www.forensicinnovations.com/blog/?p=7
--
www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
Contradictions do not exist. A. Rand
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to
: HackFest Series: TrueCrypt is Now Detectable
TrueCrypt is now Detectable http://www.forensicinnovations.com/blog/?p=7
--
www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
Contradictions do not exist. A. Rand
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss
In the US you generally don't need to hide encryption. The 5th
Amendment usually protects any key stashed in your head.
There's been an exception so far in a case where a guy allowed police
browsing, they found kiddie porn or so they say, the system got shut
off, and he wouldn't let them back in
Jim March wrote:
In the US you generally don't need to hide encryption. The 5th
Amendment usually protects any key stashed in your head.
In these days of the Patriot Act and such, I'm not certain how well that
would work. I'm sure they would at least charge you with obstruction of
justice or
Ah, you guys?
This is about the ability to determine if:
1) a header has been encrypted
2) a drive has an encrypted partition
etc...
It's a security issue.
Not so much of a political one. That's OT, I believe?
On 4/30/09, Jim March 1.jim.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
In the US you generally don't
you remember the whole 'Cypherpunks' episode right?
one of the very early Wired magazines had an excellent article on them.
-jmz
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jim March 1.jim.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
In the US you generally don't need to hide encryption. The 5th
Amendment usually
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lisa Kachold lisakach...@obnosis.com wrote:
Ah, you guys?
This is about the ability to determine if:
1) a header has been encrypted
2) a drive has an encrypted partition
etc...
It's a security issue.
Not so much of a political one. That's OT, I
15 matches
Mail list logo
