I would prefer Xen to the other crap thats in use. There seems to be
a great variation in the service levels (both price and in what the
machines offer).
The other requirement is that I have to run debian on there. No rpm-
based distros for me.
Anyone have any recommendations?
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Mike Garfias wrote:
I would prefer Xen to the other crap thats in use. There seems to be
a great variation in the service levels (both price and in what the
machines offer).
The other requirement is that I have to run debian on there. No rpm-
based distros for
I looked at unixshell, but they're full up. And tektonic is doing
virtuozzo or whatever it is.
On Sep 5, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Mike Garfias wrote:
I would prefer Xen to the other crap thats in use. There seems to be
a great variation in the service
Mike Garfias wrote:
I looked at unixshell, but they're full up. And tektonic is doing
virtuozzo or whatever it is.
A question for you experienced people...
As long as your virtual server is running your OS of choice, you should
be agnostic about what virtual machine engine provides your
I believe I'm on my fourth year with linode.com's exellent UML based product.
Note: They did a year-long beta of a Xen approach and found that it
lacked the resource controls that they needed.
On 9/5/07, Mike Garfias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer Xen to the other crap thats in use.
Mike Garfias wrote:
I would prefer Xen to the other crap thats in use. There seems to be
a great variation in the service levels (both price and in what the
machines offer).
The other requirement is that I have to run debian on there. No rpm-
based distros for me.
Anyone have any
UML is my 2nd choice. VMWare and virtuozzo is NOT on my list (had
bad experiences with VMware in the past, virtuozzo looks like it has
the same issues).
On Sep 5, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
I believe I'm on my fourth year with linode.com's exellent UML
based product.
