Re: [pmacct-discussion] sfacctd and nfacctd using the same db tables

2020-01-22 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Jordan, Yes, that is a valid scenario. To minimize effects locking (which impact is only increased memory footprint due to the writers sitting there waiting for the lock), you could play with sql_startup_delay so that the two daemons fire up writers with some time offset; but, if the two

[pmacct-discussion] sfacctd and nfacctd using the same db tables

2020-01-22 Thread Jordan Grigorov (Neterra NMT)
Hello, We're using a mixed network environment with equipment that supports either sflow or netflow. Currently we're using sfacctd only and mysql plugin which stores data into MariaDB CS database. Is there any option to use both sfacctd and nfacctd that are using the same DB and tables?