Hi Jordan,
Outcome of our exchange was that it was actually not a bug; rather
packets were VLAN-tagged (and libpcap filters are sensible to both
VLAN tags and MPLS labels). So, in the end, the filter had to be
written as:
set_tag=4 ip=0.0.0.0/0filter='ip or (vlan and ip)'
set_tag=6
Hi Paolo,
Yes very perplexing. If you can ping me privately, I can give you more
detail and show you what I am seeing.
Thanks,
-/-Derrick
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Hi Derrick,
>
> You mean you get only v4 or v6 in the /tmp/pmacct.json? When
Hi Derrick,
You mean you get only v4 or v6 in the /tmp/pmacct.json? When records
are purged from the cache to the print_output_file, there is no
distinction as v4 vs v6 (ie. separate loops or so) so i'm a bit
puzzled - i can confirm you i've never been reported anything like
that plus you have no
Hi Paolo,
Seeing something weird with this setup. When I restart the sflow process,
I will get either all IPv4 or all IPv6 for each refresh. Have you seen
this before? Below is my config.
==
!e Defaults
debug: false
daemonize: true
plugins: print
print_refresh_time: 60
print_history_roundoff:
Hi Paolo,
Opps ;) I forgot about that. That did the trick! The bgp agent mapping
config with dual v4/v6 sessions seems to be the key for me.
Again appreciate the help and quick responses!
-/-Derrick
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Hi Derrick,
>
>
Hi Derrick,
This should be because, according to the config you sent in the first
email, you have 'bgp_daemon_ip: X.X.X.X' - which effectively binds the
BGP daemon to only X.X.X.X. Please comment it out and if necessary do
any filtering via iptables or such. All working well, we can refine it
Hi Paolo,
It looks like I am not receiving IPv6 prefixes and the MP-BGP is not
working. I will have to configured dual sessions but the IPv6 session is
not working. Below is my agent mapping file and router config.
I am also running the latest pull from the git repo.
---
bgp_ip=10.10.10.0
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for the reply. Answers to your questions below.
Is it a good assumption the package was compiled with "--enable-ipv6",
correct?
*-- Y**es*
Also, are you sending v4 and v6 AFs over a v4 BGP session or
you have two BGP sessions, one v4 and one v6?
*-- Sending v4 & v6 over v4
Hi Derrik,
Is it a good assumption the package was compiled with "--enable-ipv6",
correct? Also, are you sending v4 and v6 AFs over a v4 BGP session or
you have two BGP sessions, one v4 and one v6? What is the content of
the file pointed by bgp_agent_map? Last question for this round: do
you see