Re: [pmacct-discussion] mySQL ATON/NTOA and pmacct performance

2014-09-18 Thread itriA30110
Hi Paolo and Scott, Your discussion pointed out an important issue - what is the proper design when it comes to high frequently IP-based queries? Inspired by this thread, my idea is to use postgresql and count on its cidr/inet function. (I am using mysql and store ipv4 as string(15))

Re: [pmacct-discussion] mySQL ATON/NTOA and pmacct performance

2014-09-18 Thread Olivier Benghozi
Hi guys, I just wanted to summarize that: It looks like a fine way to address IPs in a DB seems to be the pgsql way. Fast, and you can easily select data using subnets without relying on regexp. While in mysql you either obtain a int value difficult to handle, or a string very slow to search

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Request for Feedback: Additional Features for pmacct

2014-09-18 Thread Andreas Larsen
These addon looks great in my book. I really do like pmacct but have not had the chance to implement it other than in testing due the the lack of a good frontend ( and due to the fact that we lack time to develop one ourself) Med vänlig hälsning Andreas Larsen IP-Only Telecommunication AB|