[pmacct-discussion] sfacctd and nfacctd using the same db tables

Hello, We're using a mixed network environment with equipment that supports either sflow or netflow. Currently we're using sfacctd only and mysql plugin which stores data into MariaDB CS database. Is there any option to use both sfacctd and nfacctd that are using the same DB and tables?

Re: [pmacct-discussion] sfacctd and nfacctd using the same db tables

Hi Jordan, Yes, that is a valid scenario. To minimize effects locking (which impact is only increased memory footprint due to the writers sitting there waiting for the lock), you could play with sql_startup_delay so that the two daemons fire up writers with some time offset; but, if the two

Re: [pmacct-discussion] nbar/nbar2

On 1/22/20 11:20 AM, Stephen Clark wrote: Hi Paolo, can nfprobe export nbar data like cisco's? Thanks, Steve Answering my own question it appears that is can. Is anybody using it sending NetFlows to SolarWinds. -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve

Re: [pmacct-discussion] nbar/nbar2

On 1/22/20 2:40 PM, Stephen Clark wrote: On 1/22/20 11:20 AM, Stephen Clark wrote: Hi Paolo, can nfprobe export nbar data like cisco's? Thanks, Steve Answering my own question it appears that is can. Is anybody using it sending NetFlows to SolarWinds. Answering my question again - it

[pmacct-discussion] nbar/nbar2

Hi Paolo, can nfprobe export nbar data like cisco's? Thanks, Steve -- ___ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists