Re: [pmacct-discussion] ?^??: ?^??: Multiple pmacct processes listening at similar interface

2016-03-02 Thread itriA30110
The IT team was using a commercial product , called 'nreporter' , that can collect all flow protocol in single port. This is a nice feature because not all of IT member understand varieties of flow protocols of varieties router. The plan was to replace the commercial collector and keep router

Re: [pmacct-discussion] IPv6 BGP lookup

2016-03-02 Thread Derrick Sawyer
Hi Paolo, Thanks for the reply. Answers to your questions below. Is it a good assumption the package was compiled with "--enable-ipv6", correct? *-- Y**es* Also, are you sending v4 and v6 AFs over a v4 BGP session or you have two BGP sessions, one v4 and one v6? *-- Sending v4 & v6 over v4

Re: [pmacct-discussion] IPv6 BGP lookup

2016-03-02 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Derrik, Is it a good assumption the package was compiled with "--enable-ipv6", correct? Also, are you sending v4 and v6 AFs over a v4 BGP session or you have two BGP sessions, one v4 and one v6? What is the content of the file pointed by bgp_agent_map? Last question for this round: do you see

Re: [pmacct-discussion] amqp user/pass

2016-03-02 Thread Raphael Mazelier
Le 01/03/2016 23:41, Paolo Lucente a écrit : Hi Raphael, Good point you raise: legacy is never a good reason but that's the reason; ideally amqp_user and amqp_passwd should be added to the configuration struct in cfg.h and all should be pointed to those. It's the same for a few other cases