Re: [pmacct-discussion] pgsql tables v8/v9

2018-12-06 Thread Paolo Lucente


Hi Fabien,

Thanks for your note. I have just committed the following to clarify:

https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/commit/0c98bd8660abc982158c2456ab8099e639475a55

Paolo

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Fabien VINCENT wrote:
> Dear List, 
> 
> Documentation is pretty fine regarding tables v1 to v7. But what about
> v8/v9 structures ? Why should I need these one ? 
> 
> Thanks for the feedback
> 
> -- 
> 
> FABIEN VINCENT
> ---
>  @beufanet
> 
> ---

> ___
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists


Re: [pmacct-discussion] pgsql tables v8/v9

2018-12-06 Thread Fanen A.
Hi Fabien,

My understanding when I deployed my instance a while ago was that you would
use the table version that contains the fields you are interested in. So
you can have a look at the table schema and see if it contains what you
want, or more than you need and change accordingly.

I hope that helps.
Fanen.

On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 09:23 Fabien VINCENT  wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> Documentation is pretty fine regarding tables v1 to v7. But what about
> v8/v9 structures ? Why should I need these one ?
>
> Thanks for the feedback
> --
> *Fabien VINCENT*
> ---
> @beufanet
> ---
> ___
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

[pmacct-discussion] pgsql tables v8/v9

2018-12-06 Thread Fabien VINCENT
Dear List, 

Documentation is pretty fine regarding tables v1 to v7. But what about
v8/v9 structures ? Why should I need these one ? 

Thanks for the feedback

-- 

FABIEN VINCENT
---
 @beufanet

---___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists