Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

I wanted to check back in and say thanks to everyone. After some time digging in I finally got my nfacctd data into InfluxDB and Grafana. Had to learn a lot on the way but I can finally put nfacctd to good use now! Robert On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Rasto Rickardt wrote:

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

Hi Raphael, We are doing one measurment for each netflow exporter. Also we keep only the data for 60 days ( retention policy on influxdb ). On top of that we run continuous queries to generate a new measurment for total traffic in/ total traffic in from transit/peers , this are the most used

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

On 10/11/2016 20:58, Catalin Petrescu wrote: Hi Robert, We had good results with grafana and influxdb using below : -src_as,dst_as,peer_src_as,peer_dst_as,peer_src_ip,as_path,dst_net,src_net,dst_mask,src_mask,in_iface,std_comm,med,proto,src_as_path We export the flow records from pmacctd to

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

Hi Robert, We had good results with grafana and influxdb using below : -src_as,dst_as,peer_src_as,peer_dst_as,peer_src_ip,as_path,dst_net,src_net,dst_mask,src_mask,in_iface,std_comm,med,proto,src_as_path We export the flow records from pmacctd to kafka then import into influxdb and from there

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

What I'm not sure of is whether or not time-series is the correct way to store my data? I am currently aggregating nfacctd data based on flow timestamps for accounting purposes. For those using InfuxDB and Graphite/Graphana, what primitives are you aggregating on and what do you pull out of the

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Graphing Options

This was actually being discussed yesterday on AUSNOG. A recommendation was http://uowits.github.io/herbert-gui/index.html however more suited to end user billing it might be suited to your needs? On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Robert Juric wrote: > After fiddling