Patrick R. Michaud said...
Would the community prefer that I go ahead and issue a 2.2.0
release now, with the understanding that the remaining RoadMap
features will appear in a later minor release? Or should I
continue to hold the beta designation until those later
features are done?
Yes.
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 15:24:03 +0200
From: marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?
To: pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Patrick R. Michaud said...
Would the community prefer that I go
2008/4/29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
*But*, as Clayton Curtis has problems in adopting non formally stable
software, I suggest the 2.2.0 version is now issued quickly; any other
enhancement will eventually follow at due time.
Political correct answer :) I do agree, though.
It's
Any news about this?
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Curtis, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has
a policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to
the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as
2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a
policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to
the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as things stand).
Within pmwiki's philosophy a beta is not
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:33:30PM +0200, Hans Huijgen wrote:
2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a
policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to
the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26
I would favour releasing 2.2, and including the outstanding features in
2.21.
- Henrik
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:33:30PM +0200, Hans Huijgen wrote:
2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our
I'd personally prefer to think that any tiny second of Patrick's
precious time is spent adding planned features instead of formally
releasing a 2.2 version which has already proven to be more than
stable.
*But*, as Clayton Curtis has problems in adopting non formally stable
software, I suggest the
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:19:27 -0500
Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the community prefer that I go ahead and issue a 2.2.0
release now, with the understanding that the remaining RoadMap
features will appear in a later minor release? Or should I
continue to hold the beta
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a
policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to
the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as things stand). Failing a release pretty
soon, I may be compelled to migrate to MediaWiki, which has built-in
10 matches
Mail list logo
