* Marc Green pongu...@gmail.com [2011-05-20T16:24:21]
links. More specifically, I understand how it resolves L links, but I am
confused as to why you resolve C links. From reading the source, I
gather that C links are resolved by searching pod documents for =item
directives, and storing their
On 05/20/2011 03:16 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* Marc Greenpongu...@gmail.com [2011-05-20T16:24:21]
links. More specifically, I understand how it resolves L links, but I am
confused as to why you resolve C links. From reading the source, I
gather that C links are resolved by searching pod
My guess is that it's just plain wrong, so no wonder it's confusing.
Perhaps it's reflecting an early design, or perhaps it's just a typo, and L
was meant instead of C. L can link to =items provided they are of a type
that permits that. Currently, the only ones that are are ones that are in
