Re: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake

2010-04-20 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: I'd really like to get the perldoc command broken into 5.12.1, and I think we'll have the best chance of that if the delta to the new version is as small as possible. Can we do 3.14 just for that (and the already-fixed warnings) and then

Re: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake

2010-04-20 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: That is not what I'd expect. I would not guess that Jesse wants a subset of changes, getting us a dual-lived module with no corresponding CPAN release and a version number that was never available elsewhere. It's what I'd expect given that

Re: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake

2010-04-19 Thread Ricardo Signes
* David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com [2010-04-17T16:46:23] Looks good to me. Hopefully, this is how Pod::Simple worked before I changed it to escape everything. If so, it should be as simple as applying this patch:

Re: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake

2010-04-19 Thread Ricardo Signes
* David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com [2010-04-19T13:17:13] I think I'd rather pull in that commit and have you and Madsen verify that it's compliance with the new wording of the spec *before* I release it. Seem reasonable? Sounds great, I'll get this done in the next 2-3 days. -- rjbs