Re: AW: Working on CPAN Testers fails for Pod::Simple::Search
On 04/24/2016 11:34 PM, Marek Rouchal wrote: Does this mean that there is a "find"-like function in Pod::Simple that replaces Pod::Find? That would be an opportunity to discontinue Pod::Find along with Pod::Parser... -Marek Looking at the man page, it looks like Pod::Simple::Search does a similar function as Pod::Find does
Re: Pod::Simple issues
On 04/29/2016 01:58 PM, Shawn H Corey wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:34:21 -0600 Karl Williamsonwrote: Nested L<> are illegal. Pretending inner one is X<> so can continue looking for other errors. That would be Z<> That would generate an additional warning that it wasn't empty. The mechanism is to divert the incoming text into the X<> so it doesn't do anything bad. I suppose we could set a flag for the Z<> to suppress the warning.
Re: Pod::Simple issues
Karl Williamsonwrites: > Rather than aborting parsing at the point where this occurs, I think it > should continue on, but generate an errors section, like it does for most > other errors. This will cause a hard failure in pod2man and pod2text by default, since they do not generate ERRORS sections by default (you have to request that behavior with a flag). They used to generate ERRORS sections, which made people very unhappy because they didn't want their documents published with sections saying the documents were bad, and after a lot of previous discussion I changed the default to fail on generation. (I'd really rather not reverse that decision at this point.) -- #!/usr/bin/perl -- Russ Allbery, Just Another Perl Hacker $^=q;@!>~|{>krw>yn{u<$$<[~|| 0gFzD gD, 00Fz, 0,,( 0hF 0g)F/=, 0> "L$/GEIFewe{,$/ 0C$~> "@=,m,|,(e 0.), 01,pnn,y{ rw} >;,$0=q,$,,($_=$^)=~y,$/ C-~><@=\n\r,-~$:-u/ #y,d,s,(\$.),$1,gee,print
Re: Working on CPAN Testers fails for Pod::Simple::Search
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Ricardo Signeswrote: > * "David E. Wheeler" [2016-04-29T16:43:03] > > Anyone object to making Neil a committer and co-maint on Pod-Simple? (I’m > > hoping Neil doesn’t object.) The canonical repository is here: > > No objection, and I preemptively overrule Neil's potential objection. > I very much welcome it!