[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-poi (in module jakarta-poi) failed

2006-12-04 Thread Gump [HEAD] :-(
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-poi has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-poi (in module jakarta-poi) failed

2006-12-04 Thread Gump [HEAD] :-(
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-poi has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: [VOTE] Another alpha release?

2006-12-04 Thread Nick Burch
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Rainer Klute wrote: However, a beta should be only a step on the way to a full release. This is something we really need to have. There are probably many users out there who don't trust in any beta or alpha releases - not to speak about a nighly build. They just grab the

Re[2]: [VOTE] Another alpha release?

2006-12-04 Thread Yegor Kozlov
+1a. Does the full release mean that HSLF will be moved out of the scratchpad area? Yegor NB * should we do a release now, freeze, work to a release now, release with NB some HSLF apis that are about to change, without excel comment support NB etc, then do another release in the new

Re[2]: [VOTE] Another alpha release?

2006-12-04 Thread Nick Burch
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Yegor Kozlov wrote: Does the full release mean that HSLF will be moved out of the scratchpad area? No, that'd need another vote. I think we have some way to go before that'd be approved (based on past discussion), in terms of functionality, documentation, examples etc

Re: [VOTE] Another alpha release?

2006-12-04 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Fine code freeze for 5 minutes. Create a branch. Tag releases from said branch. -Andy Rainer Klute wrote: Andrew C. Oliver schrieb: -1 to any kind of code freeze that lasts more than the time it takes to create a branch. I can accept any -1 that eventually leads to creating a