Hello
Phew. Well I am back from a long (well not long enough) holiday. I have a
corruption issue I am trying to track down in POI.
I have just tried to run the test target in the build and it is failing. Is
this a known issue?
Also I just checked in a small change to LabelRecord. I
I have just tried to run the test target in the build and it is
failing. Is this a known issue?
HEAD is very much a work in progress, there are failing testcases.
REL_2_BRANCH if stable.
Also I just checked in a small change to LabelRecord.
I assume I should be checking these changes into
Would that be why getrow() is not working? (see my earlier email Possible
Bug HSSFSheet.getRow(row))...?
Eric Pugh
-Original Message-
From: Avik Sengupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:04 AM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: Test build target not
On 9/17/03 2:20 AM, Height, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Phew. Well I am back from a long (well not long enough) holiday. I have a
corruption issue I am trying to track down in POI.
I have just tried to run the test target in the build and it is failing. Is
this a known
jheight 2003/09/17 19:10:50
Modified:src/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/model Sheet.java
src/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/record DBCellRecord.java
ExtSSTInfoSubRecord.java ExtSSTRecord.java
IndexRecord.java SSTDeserializer.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9576.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All,
As you can see this patch was quite large. It was mainly from my early patch
(before the performance improvements).
I haven't attached this to the 2.0 branch because it is major functionality
enhancement. I know at least one company that will be using this code though
;-)
I will close
Hello
On the head I get some weird strings for uncompressed label records due to
the following code:
field_6_value = StringUtil.getFromUnicodeBE(data, 9 + offset,
field_4_string_len);
Now I think that this should be
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:37:00 +0930
(Subject: LabelRecord Uncompressed)
Height, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the head I get some weird strings for uncompressed label records due to
the following code:
field_6_value = StringUtil.getFromUnicodeBE(data, 9 + offset,
I think there is a marker which says whether or not it is one or the other.
On 9/17/03 11:07 PM, Height, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On the head I get some weird strings for uncompressed label records due to
the following code:
field_6_value =
jheight 2003/09/17 20:44:56
Modified:src/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/record LabelRecord.java
Log:
Based on my trials and Tetsuya's email i have changed this to use getFromUnicodeLE
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -1
Hmm I wonder if we should be using a UnicodeString here?
I suspect that all Records should actually use hold onto the UnicodeString
class which knows how to decode compressed/uncompressed, rich text etc.
Looking at the Excel Developers Kit it seems to indicate this. At the moment
we potentially
IIRC, The only problem is that Excel doesn't mark it consistently. Thus the
UnicodeString actually only covers *one* way that Excel does this.
On 9/17/03 11:56 PM, Height, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm I wonder if we should be using a UnicodeString here?
I suspect that all Records
jheight 2003/09/17 22:21:33
Modified:src/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/record StringRecord.java
Log:
StringRecords are inValueSection.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +7 -1
jakarta-poi/src/java/org/apache/poi/hssf/record/StringRecord.java
Index: StringRecord.java
14 matches
Mail list logo
