Hi
Since a couple of days we are using policyd-weight and are really happy.
It saves us from buying more powerfull hardware as the load on the
server dropped from 90% to 10% (spamassassin has nothing todo anymore).
So far i have two questions:
1. how can we support the policyd-weight
On 16/10/2007, Robert Felber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:36:11AM +0200, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
2. in the log i have quite often the following entry
Oct 16 08:30:53 schilt postfix/policyd[20148]: decided action=DUNNO NULL
() Sender; delay: 0s
I don't know exactly
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:17:38PM +0200, Robert Felber wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Riaan Kok wrote:
On 16/10/2007, Robert Felber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:36:11AM +0200, Andreas
Have another policyd-weight understanding problem.
Get the following in the logs:
Oct 16 09:17:23 schilt postfix/policyd[20310]: weighted check:
NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5
HELO_IP_IN_CL16_SUBNET=-0.41 RESOLVED_IP_IS_NOT_HELO=1.5 (check from:
.gov.
