Re: Polkit on Duktape

2015-08-13 Thread Richard Hughes
On 13 August 2015 at 04:28, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: it's unlikely to see this land, which is a bit disappointing. I'm not sure my vote carries much weight, but I'd much rather be linking duktape than mozjs. Richard. ___

Re: Polkit on Duktape

2015-08-13 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:37:38AM -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: Is that really different from standalone releases of mozjs, which have never been officially supported by Mozilla? Are people really using / area we getting a lot of value from the javascript functionality at all? Is there any

Re: Polkit on Duktape

2015-08-13 Thread Simon McVittie
On 13/08/15 17:37, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: (just drop two new files in there, similar to pcre in glib) Similar to the same PCRE in GLib that has been modified locally, hasn't been updated to a new upstream version since 2012, caused test failures when updated (until recently), hasn't been used

Re: Polkit on Duktape

2015-08-13 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: For performance reasons related to boot speed on our platform, today I ported polkit to use Duktape. A notable pain I see here is that in dropping mozjs support, it will effectively force a branch, and that will in turn complicate