On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:57 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 02:23 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit/tree/
How come not in the main PolicyKit git repo? :-)
I wanted to get a release out, not learn more about how git works - I'll
move
Hey Michael,
Thanks for looking through this and apologies for replying late; just
got back from a short vacation.
Looks like EggDBus has an unnecessary configure check for expat.h (it
seems to be used nowhere in the code).
Good catch, expat is indeed not used now as we're now using GMarkup
2009/1/22 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
Along with the two patches I sent, the following two minimal spec
files produce RPM files. I've not yet checked that they actually work,
although they are probably 99% the way there.
Is the package going to be called PolicyKit1, policykit1,
Hey,
I've now moved all the commits of the PolicyKit rewrite into the main
repository, see
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/PolicyKit/
Also, the old polkit.git repo in my home directory on people.fd.o is
no longer available.
I promised writing up a TODO list, this is now done, see
Hey,
Here we go again with a new PolicyKit release
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-0.91/
http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-0.91/docs/
Lots of bug fixes and new features this release; major highlights
- parallel builds should work
- plug-in architecture landed
- a
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Just curious: Why the rename from PolicyKit to polkit and
PolicyKit-gnome to polkit-gnome?
Mostly because the name was going to change.
Would you like package descriptions to be updated and use the new names?
Yeah, I think so.
I also
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:40 +0900, Jooncheol Park wrote:
Hi, all
I saw http://cgit.freedesktop.org/PolicyKit/tree/COPYING
but, I know PolicyKit license was MIT/X11 until 0.9
Does PolicyKit going to change the license from MIT to LGPLv2 ?
Yes, the new version of PolicyKit is a complete
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:26 +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
Hey David,
Hey, thanks for looking at this.
I won't answer in blocks since your mail was pretty long and clear. First
things first, what you described seems great. Although, I have a couple of
questions.
Basically, your structure of
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 10:30 -0500, Robby Workman wrote:
Heh, I just pinged you on IRC about this. I've got a polkitagenthelper.c
file that uses shadow instead of PAM (I finally got around to looking at
it in more detail last night), but it's not compile tested at all yet;
I'm working on some
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
2009/7/27 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk:
this still true if the d-bus daemon is restarted?)
The system bus daemon should _never ever_ be restarted. The guarantee
that unique system bus names are _never_ recycled is a good reason why
Hey Richard,
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515769 a user has set
the PolicyKit action for shutting down the system policy as no.
Actually, what the user in the bug report has done won't work since the
mechanism used
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:44 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/8/10 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com:
Or you simply call org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.CanStop
which was added for just this purpose...
Seems odd being a method, shouldn't this be a property?
No, the value
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 17:11 +0100, James Westby wrote:
Hi,
Many policies specify no for inactive sessions, which makes sense
given the name, but the behaviour of consolekit means that users
who log in over ssh are considered inactive, and so they cannot
use apps with such policies.
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:45 +0100, Dario Freddi wrote:
Hey,
On Friday 13 November 2009 22:20:59 David Zeuthen wrote:
Hey,
Here's a couple of new release
I'm missing the git tag for them. Could you please tag them up on git as well?
Done. Thanks.
David
Hi,
Sounds good to me in principle and something I've been wanting to do for
some time. I prefer to deal with things like this in bugzilla - so
please open a bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=PolicyKit
and we can look at the details there.
Thanks,
David
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 12:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:47:46AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Sounds good to me in principle and something I've been wanting to do
for
some time. I prefer to deal with things like this in bugzilla - so
please open a bug at
https
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Sudo does, in a rudimentary way. Anything in the env_check list is
removed if the value contains a % or a / character. The default list
treated this way is:
TERM
LINGUAS
LC_*
LANGUAGE
LANG
COLORTERM
Additionally,
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 15:42 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:27:19PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
I just implemented this - see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25594
Awesome. Thanks much. Sorry I've been swamped with other things
recently -- didn't mean
since PolicyKit 0.95:
David Zeuthen (15):
Bug 25367 — Also read local authority configuration data from /etc
Fix logic error in pk-example-frobnicate
Run the open_session part of the PAM stack in pkexec(1)
Fix up last comment
Bug 25594 – System logging
Remove
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 18:22 -0400, Yclept Nemo wrote:
Polkit contains the
/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.freedesktop.policykit.policy actions
file. Is any accompanying mechanism provided as well?
I am hoping along the lines of:
/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/*
- a service file that
to David Zeuthen for the idea. */
Technically you are just speaking to libpolkit-agent-1 (or whoever
launched the helper). No need for this comment.
+ /* Ask shadow about the user requesting authentication */
+ if ((shadow = getspnam (user_to_auth)) == NULL)
Split into separate lines
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Nicolas Monnet n...@altiva.fr wrote:
I tried. I'm obviously not smart enough, but thanks for the condescension.
It always helps.
Dude, don't be like that - Matthias is trying to help you. FWIW, it's
very common that end users don't read docs but rely on
gobject-introspection = 0.6.2 (optional)
pam (optional)
Changes since PolicyKit 0.96:
Andrew Psaltis (1):
Add shadow support
Dan Rosenberg (1):
Bug 26982 – pkexec information disclosure vulnerability
David Zeuthen (23):
Post-release version bump to 0.97
Port core bits
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Radek Novacek rnova...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday 09 of August 2010 23:53:19 David Zeuthen wrote:
Build requirements
glib, gobject, gio = 2.25.11
Actually I think that at least version 2.25.12 is required. With 2.25.11 it
throws
Walters (3):
Remove duplicate definitions of enumeration types
Fix (correct) GCC warning about possibly-uninitialized variable
Fix another GCC uninitialized variable warning
David Zeuthen (2):
Post-release version bump to 0.99
Update NEWS for release
Vincent
version 0.99.
Build requirements
polkit= 0.97
gtk+-2.0 = 2.17.1
Changes since 0.97:
David Zeuthen (5):
Post-release version bump to 0.98
Fix wrong date in NEWS file
Fix up --string-prefix usage to work with latest gobject-introspection
Bump version to 0.99
Hey,
A while ago, I was privately contacted about a vulnerability in
PolicyKit. For more details see,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692922
Now that the embargo for this issue has been lifted (my contact from
Red Hat's security response team has been in contact with other
vendors
of the code still needs
some security review. Use at your own risk.
Build requirements
glib, gobject, gio= 2.28
gobject-introspection = 0.6.2 (optional)
pam (optional)
Changes since PolicyKit 0.101:
Benjamin Otte (1):
introspection: Add --c-include to the gir files
David Zeuthen
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Alan Near l...@sendrecv.net wrote:
I've found a mistype in documentation.
Committed, thanks. Sorry for the lag.
David
___
polkit-devel mailing list
polkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hey,
Sorry I missed your message, for some reason it was in my spam folder.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Nikki VonHollen vonhol...@google.com wrote:
Hi David and friends,
I'm working on adding netgroup support to Policy Kit.
Before we start talking about specifics or the code, do you
):
Mistype in DBus object: PoliycKit1 - PolicyKit1
David Zeuthen (7):
Post-release version bump to 0.103
Add support for the org.freedesktop.policykit.imply annotation
Add --no-debug option and use this for D-Bus activation
Bug 41025 – Add
)
pam (optional)
ConsoleKit OR systemd
Changes since polkit 0.105:
Colin Walters (3):
build: Check for mozjs185, not libjs
autogen.sh: Fix check for libtool (we only need libtoolize)
agenthelper-pam: Fix newline-trimming code
David Zeuthen (65):
Post-release version bump
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Serghei Amelian serg...@thel.ro wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to create a polkit agent for KDE3, using dbus calls and
polkit-agent-helper-1.
Two things:
1. Please don't do this - just use libpolkit-agent-1.so instead, it's
much easier and it's better if we are all
33 matches
Mail list logo
