On Dec 15, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Robert Scheck wrote:
Yes the colum spacing looks better, but whenever an umlaut (ä, ö,
ü, Ä, Ö,
Ü, ß) or similar should be displayed, it aborts somehow. Please
note, that
I can't reproduce when having LANG=C for example. Oh, and it's NOT
kudzu
having this
On Dec 19, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
Moin Jeff,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
See if the attached patch (the minimum necessary reversion to
popt-1.12
afaict) fixes your linux problems.
If the patch fixes the linux problems, I'll see if I can rework the
Solaris
On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote:
Actually I'm not sure what is your problem.
Which applications do you try?
It seems recently some of modules, GTK, Bonobo and GNOME session,
uses goption. When the application uses --help options, it includes
the output
On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
I think it would be nice to allow an equal to separate a short option
letter from its abutting argument. e.g. these commands using the
test1
executable would all work the same:
./test1 -2 foo
./test1 -2=foo
./test1 -2foo
./test1 --arg2
On Mar 9, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:42:37AM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
/bin/echo on my system is unmodified from
Fedora 9 coreutils-6.10-4.fc9.i386
Interesting. So, what do you get with a manual run?
/bin/echo --foo --bar
/bin/echo -- --foo
I've built popt-1.14 for release in the next couple of days.
The SRPM for popt-1.4 that I will be releasing is at
http://wraptastic.org/pub/i386-linux/SRPMS/popt-1.14-1.src.rpm
Enjoy!
73 de Jeff
__
POPT Library
While using popt in another program, I came across 2 usage
cases that might be usefully internalized in popt.
One usage case was an attempt to specify a memory limit as
--memory 16777216
Adding unit scaling, e.g.
--memory 16Mb
--memory 16384Kb
would not be hard to add using something
While I'm thinking about popt features, here is another:
The BSD kernel (iirc) devised a means to map bit files to names
using a %b format.
A string was used to map bit# - name. E.g. here's an example
from some rpmdb code that I use for output purposes
static const char * dbtFlags =
On May 25, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello all,
I've claimed that I can see some umlaut issues with popt 1.14 and I
really
would like to see it solved, now. Reproducer is for me as follows.
Using
popt-1.13-3 from Fedora 8, 9 or Rawhide, I simply executed the
following:
$
is not such hard as I got you - if needed for 1.14+
or so
On May 25, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On May 25, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
Hello all,
I've claimed that I can see some umlaut issues with popt 1.14 and
I really
would like to see it solved, now. Reproducer
/initialization.
At the same time, I will probably add a new
poptReadConfigFiles() method whose argument
will be a colon separated list of configuration
file paths to read.
Any other opinions?
73 de Jeff
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
Date: December 18, 2008 3:15:33 PM EST
On Jul 24, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Only true if you install POPT into standard system locations. But if I
install POPT with --includedir=/usr/include/popt --libdir=/usr/lib/
popt
the pkg-config file still allows me to build and link against POPT
without having to know
On May 10, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Pieter Bowman wrote:
I did builds of popt 1.16 on a number of our systems here. Test 59
failed on a number of the systems with the following output:
The fix for the failure in popt-1.16 make check is likely (I have
easy no easy means of testing across all the
On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
but
--foo bar
returns bar in the argument list?
Yes. The user may well have wanted it to be in the arg list. There's no way
for the program to know that the user
On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Danny Sung wrote:
On 06/05/2010 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
(aside)
Anything you want to see in POPT 2.0? I'm collecting features ...
Since you're collecting features... =)
One thing I'd like is to extend the help/usage capability just a little.
Well
On Jun 5, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
Here's something that was recently fixed for the popt that is included
with rsync: rejecting an arg to an option that doesn't take an arg.
Attached is a patch. A new error code, POPT_ERROR_UNWANTEDARG, was
created to make the error message
This is another ancient (circa 1997) in POPT.
The argv returned through certain interfaces ('d have
to check, but the issue bites me every couple months)
has everything allocated in one contiguous blob so
that an experienced/lazy programmer just has to do
const char * s = bing bang boom;
There's a thread on gcrypt-devel that is directly
relevant to POPT library compatibility and symbol handling:
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel
(You will get a 403 Forbidden for the gcrypt-devel archives, go find a mirror)
And for reference, there's Drepper's deep
On Jun 18, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
Ah, okay. I guess I was envisioning for runtime checks:
void *f = dlopen(NULL, RTLD_LAZY);
if (dlsym(f, popt_something)) {
...
}
Any idea how portably POSIX dlsym() is in 2010?
There's the GNUish dlvsym() that needs
One of the more subtle additions in popt-1.16 is
POPT_ARG_BITSET
This a Bloom filter data type that parses option
arguments as a CSV and adds to the bit set.
What is difficult to describe is why/how Bloom filters
work (wikipedia does an excellent job) and particularly
how to describe
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:25 AM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
What test are failing? Like long long and double, the tests are quite
complete
over data types and It Really Doesn't Matter: hardly ant program needs/uses
long long and double CLI
On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
Other than those failed tests, I do now have it working without the need to
revert to an older version.
If you send alon a patch for VS, I'll try to carry that in popt (I don't do VS
or Windoze but ..)
There's a patch for Xcode in popt
On Mar 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if you could respond to my question ? Are ou going to get the
issues sorted out regarding the license texts ?
I thought this reply (Mark Hatle is part of the the @rpm5.org project that
On Mar 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if you could respond to my question ? Are ou going to get the
issues sorted out regarding the license texts ?
Is the most important issue -- highlighted in RED -- the fact that
the POPT license
On Jul 5, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) wrote:
Hello,
The following two mails got in your archive without my agreeement. I cannot
accept that my complete adress and email contact is online.
My memory of the series of events leading to these messages goes like this:
On Sep 7, 2011, at 4:44 AM, Christian Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to parse a command line that can contain multiple variable
number of arguments for a parameter, e.g.
program -r /dev/sda /dev/sdb -m /dev/sdc /dev/sdd -b 16m …
Traditionally, uglix was designed with the model
26 matches
Mail list logo
