Hi,
I'm aware of the tree-lock, but still don't know how this can be
handled, and when/how the project can transition to 2.4.x.
FWIW, I plead guilty of not testing a preliminary 2.4 port, but will do
ASAP if I get my hands on one.
The problem described below is still biting me hard. =8-(
On
Hi,
On Wed, 14.05.2008 at 04:05:28 +0200, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdpo...@bsws.de wrote:
and makes a regular update a no-no in my eyes. I have been using
ldbm everywhere all the time, because that was the only stable backend
for years. I suspect I amnot quite alone (read:many many many
On 2009/07/09 11:31, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 14.05.2008 at 04:05:28 +0200, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdpo...@bsws.de wrote:
and makes a regular update a no-no in my eyes. I have been using
ldbm everywhere all the time, because that was the only stable backend
for years. I
Hi,
On Thu, 09.07.2009 at 11:25:07 +0100, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org
wrote:
so; some developers need 2.3. other people need 2.4. others don't
nice distinction. ;-}
I have to correct myself, however, in that syncrepl synchronization
does appear to (partially) work. With bdb, I was
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
I was hoping someone could help me out here, as I am getting assembler
errors, which I do not have enough knowledge to debug. It seems I
only get these when using external versions of various libraries, as
bulding mplayer standalone
On 2009/07/09 16:50, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 09.07.2009 at 11:25:07 +0100, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org
wrote:
so; some developers need 2.3. other people need 2.4. others don't
nice distinction. ;-}
well, some other people might need 2.3 too, but I know for sure there
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2009-07-09 21:14]:
Me too, but if something pulls in 2.3 as a BUILD or LIB depend, and
something else pulls in 2.4
is this really going to happen?
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP -
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hello,
Our in tree version of MPlayer is ancient. I noticed this when trying
smplayer last week and it told me so. I CC'd the maintainer of mplayer
in and I have not heard anything, so I attempted to take an update on
myself.
is
On 2009/07/09 22:16, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2009-07-09 21:14]:
Me too, but if something pulls in 2.3 as a BUILD or LIB depend, and
something else pulls in 2.4
is this really going to happen?
i don't know.
i can definitely foresee a time where things
Hello,
I've no problem, as of yet. This email is just to jump in and say
hello to the list. I'm a newbie to OpenBSD, but not to BSD as I've
tinkered with FreeBSD Since the fall of 2000.
Sincerely and Respectfully Yours,
Wayne M. Scace
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:16:04AM +, Wayne M. Scace wrote:
Hello,
I've no problem, as of yet. This email is just to jump in and say
hello to the list. I'm a newbie to OpenBSD, but not to BSD as
I've tinkered with FreeBSD Since the fall of 2000.
Sincerely and Respectfully Yours,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:03:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hello,
Our in tree version of MPlayer is ancient. I noticed this when trying
smplayer last week and it told me so. I CC'd the maintainer of mplayer
in and I have
12 matches
Mail list logo
