Re: autoconf question, was: Re: news/inn 2.4.2

2006-07-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Marc, On Sat, 08.07.2006 at 18:16:17 +0200, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I'm not saying that. Buf if it's autoconf-2.13, you'd better start by checking that, even without patching, you're re-creating an exact copy of the configure script when setting CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoconf.

autoconf question, was: Re: news/inn 2.4.2

2006-07-08 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, while still working on that INN port, I found the following problem I couldn't yet solve: I'd like to run --with-berkeleydb for a better overview style, but the process fails to find either includes or libs of db4 correctly. I've looked into the top level 'configure' file which is

Re: autoconf question, was: Re: news/inn 2.4.2

2006-07-08 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:01:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, while still working on that INN port, I found the following problem I couldn't yet solve: I'd like to run --with-berkeleydb for a better overview style, but the process fails to find either includes or libs of db4

Re: autoconf question, was: Re: news/inn 2.4.2

2006-07-08 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello Marc, On Sat, 08.07.2006 at 12:47:28 +0200, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You usually set CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoconf and let the infrastructure deal with it. thank you. I've found out in the meantime (and should become less trigger-happy with spamming mailing lists). Beware ! one

Re: autoconf question, was: Re: news/inn 2.4.2

2006-07-08 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:58:36PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: Hello Marc, On Sat, 08.07.2006 at 12:47:28 +0200, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You usually set CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoconf and let the infrastructure deal with it. thank you. I've found out in the meantime (and should