processing order lookup tables

2008-09-06 Thread gerrit
Hi All, Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions and some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions. This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender restrictions emtpy and put all under the

Re: processing order lookup tables

2008-09-06 Thread mouss
gerrit wrote: Hi All, Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions and some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions. This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender restrictions emtpy and

Different %s key from postconf and real lookups

2008-09-06 Thread Tommaso Visconti
Hi everybody, i'm trying to configure my postfix for ldap lookups, but with strange results. My ldap record has 2 important fields: 'mail' and 'uid'. Postfix should use the 'mail' field to verify the recipient and than save the email into /mail/'uid'/Maildir From main.cf: [..] alias_maps

Re: ldap+cyrus+virtual_mailbox_maps :no mailbox associated

2008-09-06 Thread mouss
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote: thanks mouss but in my mains.cf there is mailbox_transport=lmtp:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp virtual_transport=$mailbox_transport compare with $ postconf -d virtual_transport virtual_transport = virtual so virtual transport is used for cyrus do you see any

Re: Different %s key from postconf and real lookups

2008-09-06 Thread mouss
Tommaso Visconti wrote: Hi everybody, i'm trying to configure my postfix for ldap lookups, but with strange results. My ldap record has 2 important fields: 'mail' and 'uid'. Postfix should use the 'mail' field to verify the recipient and than save the email into /mail/'uid'/Maildir From

Never deliver outbound mail for a specified domain

2008-09-06 Thread Andrea Gozzi
Hi all. Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail service where they can register for a free account. Up until now I was just saving their details (name,current email,ip,..) in a database and never sending them the account login information. Since many of the scammers

Re: ldap+cyrus+virtual_mailbox_maps :no mailbox associated

2008-09-06 Thread Jorey Bump
mouss wrote, at 09/06/2008 05:12 AM: TOUZEAU DAVID wrote: pc-touzeau.klf.fr[/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp]: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] so you see. postfix says RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Sep 6 10:55:18 pc-touzeau postfix/lmtp[19755]: pc-touzeau.klf.fr[/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp]: DATA Sep 6

Re: ldap+cyrus+virtual_mailbox_maps :no mailbox associated

2008-09-06 Thread mouss
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote: No the ^ is supported by cyrus... i i create a mailbox usr/david.t it's working. the problem is to force postfix to lookup the LDAP database in order to find the right uid [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a real mailbox called dtouzeau has the uid in LDAP postfix doesn't lookup the

Re: ldap+cyrus+virtual_mailbox_maps :no mailbox associated

2008-09-06 Thread TOUZEAU DAVID
Many thanks mouss, I udnerstand.. better way is to create an alias... so ... for me the case is closed mouss a écrit : TOUZEAU DAVID wrote: No the ^ is supported by cyrus... i i create a mailbox usr/david.t it's working. the problem is to force postfix to lookup the LDAP database in order

Filter Outgoing Mail For Spam

2008-09-06 Thread Marcel Grandemange
What is the best way to filter OUTgoing mail for spam? I have postfix with postgrey and quite a few rbl lists and restrictions. Unfortunately this only takes care of some spam. We have a network where sometimes clients pc's can get infected and we want to avoid sending spam!

Re: Never deliver outbound mail for a specified domain

2008-09-06 Thread Neil
How do you know it's not someone who honestly wants a webmail account..? -N. On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Andrea Gozzi wrote: Hi all. Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail service where they can register for a free account. Up until now I was just saving their

Re: Add Throttle to outbound email?

2008-09-06 Thread Noel Jones
Jos Chrispijn wrote: James Robertson wrote: We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in size. .. 1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests .. Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is being sent from a specific email address once the mail

RE: Filter Outgoing Mail For Spam

2008-09-06 Thread Marcel Grandemange
What is the best way to filter OUTgoing mail for spam? I have postfix with postgrey and quite a few rbl lists and restrictions. Unfortunately this only takes care of some spam. We have a network where sometimes clients pc's can get infected and we want to avoid

Re: Filter Outgoing Mail For Spam

2008-09-06 Thread Sahil Tandon
Marcel Grandemange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or use a policy service that limits the number of messages a specific client can send. Here's a popular one that works well and has lots of other features: http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ That's what I thought postgrey did? No, postgrey does

Re: Bypassing RBL/SA based on recipient address

2008-09-06 Thread Noel Jones
Derek wrote: Hi Folks I have tried to setup a whitelist for some domains, the idea is to have the whitelisted domains bypass RBL and spamassassin checks (ie. deliver everything!). /etc/postfix/main.cf smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,

Bypass content_fitler based on SASL auth

2008-09-06 Thread Ian R. Justman
Hi, all. I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter based on whether someone has authenticated via SASL. The situation: I would like to build a machine that can function both to scrub spam/viruses for incoming mail (to my clients) and handle outgoing mail using

Re: Bypass content_fitler based on SASL auth

2008-09-06 Thread Sahil Tandon
Ian R. Justman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter based on whether someone has authenticated via SASL. If users authenticate via the submission (587) port, you can modify the service in master.cf with something like: -o

Re: Bypass content_fitler based on SASL auth

2008-09-06 Thread Ian R. Justman
Sahil Tandon wrote: Ian R. Justman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter based on whether someone has authenticated via SASL. If users authenticate via the submission (587) port, you can modify the service in master.cf with something like:

Re: Bypass content_fitler based on SASL auth

2008-09-06 Thread Sahil Tandon
Ian R. Justman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure you comprehended what I was asking. Careless reading on my part -- sorry for that. I am very specifically asking about port _25_. I'd like to be able to bypass content_filter= based on whether the user has