* KLaM Postmaster postmas...@klam.ca:
I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
think about things like dynamicmaps and other oddities of
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Costin Guşă wrote:
however i'm wondering if my proposed implementation would *really*
catch not only all relayed mail but also internal clients sending mail
to internal clients ?
To only catch outbound mail, use
Hello!
I have 2 servers (with external IP each of them) and 1 domain:
domain.tld - A: 100.200.30.1 (Server1-Ubuntu) running a Web Server
mail.domain.tld - A: 100.200.30.2 (Server2-Ubuntu) running postfix/dovecot
MX: 10
All the setup seems to work fine. but when I
j...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk a écrit :
Hi List,
I have Postfix 2.3.3 with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav and am
trying to block a group of users from sending to two internal maillists
called staff and pupils.
I have two files, restricted_maillists which is in the format:
Alberto Lepe a écrit :
Hello!
I have 2 servers (with external IP each of them) and 1 domain:
domain.tld - A: 100.200.30.1 (Server1-Ubuntu) running a Web Server
mail.domain.tld - A: 100.200.30.2 (Server2-Ubuntu) running postfix/dovecot
MX: 10
All the
Hello.
First of all, sorry for my poor english.
How can I cofigure my postfix to receive all messages for postmaster and
not apply smtpd_*_restrictions for it? Currently I see in my log:
Mar 12 09:18:17 zero postfix/smtpd[31761]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[94.121.227.110]: 450 4.7.1
* Rocco Scappatura rocco.scappat...@infracom.it:
Hello,
I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
as MTA.
On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
messages.
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Rocco Scappatura rocco.scappat...@infracom.it:
Hello,
I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
as MTA.
On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
messages. And so, my
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
No, it is a fine Postfix port. There is no reason to avoid it.
Indeed!
The dynamic tables make it easy to add additional table types without
re-installing Postfix or building a Postfix that supports all possible
table types. This Postfix
* KLaM Postmaster postmas...@klam.ca:
From the replies that I have received so far, I get the impression that
while no one has anything bad to say about the Ubuntu implementation of
Postfix, nobody is very enthusiastic.
Well, it works OK and doesn't generate any problems. For me.
--
Ralf
Noel,
I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses
Postfix
as MTA.
On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to
transmit
messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
messages. In particular, it looks up DNS for MX of
2009/3/12 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
The dynamic tables make it easy to add additional table types without
re-installing Postfix or building a Postfix that supports all possible
table types. This Postfix is at least as good as that on other Linux
systems.
Actually, it's
* Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com:
Bingo, RHEL5 comes with Postfix 2.3.3 and doesn't have support for
mysql/pgsql tables - which are kinda popular, y'know.
E in RHEL5 stands for except *sql, not enterprise
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de
Dear postfix users,
I have a mail-server with postfix 2.5 configured and working without
problems.
I only have an error witn one domain: [cdpoolmusic.com] . When I send
messages to that domain, I received this log notice:
postfix/error[21456]: 656B03A404D: to=[us...@cdpoolmusic.com, relay=none,
mhbe...@gmail.com:
Dear postfix users,
I have a mail-server with postfix 2.5 configured and working without
problems.
I only have an error witn one domain: [cdpoolmusic.com] . When I send
messages to that domain, I received this log notice:
postfix/error[21456]: 656B03A404D:
Hi,
Run 70+ Virtual Domains in POSTFIX
Postfix logs to /var/log/mail.log
Would like to see graphs stats separately for each domain.
I have been attempting to use Awstats with included maillogconvert.pl
script.
Since I use amavisd-new I first process the mail.log with prepflog.pl
The
Hello,
We have a postfix servers' backend for our domain (debian etch servers,
postfix 2.3.8). We have several domains and its users are in a ldap
database. So we have defined several ldap maps in postfix to check
relocated users, mail aliases and virtual users.
With this
Angel L. Mateo:
Hello,
We have a postfix servers' backend for our domain (debian etch servers,
postfix 2.3.8). We have several domains and its users are in a ldap
database. So we have defined several ldap maps in postfix to check
relocated users, mail aliases and virtual users.
El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribió:
Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
See also ldap_table(5) for details specific to LDAP lookups.
http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html
I know them.
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribió:
Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
See also ldap_table(5) for details specific to LDAP lookups.
Hello
we have a in house mail system based on postfix.
We would like to optionnaly integrate AUTH for SMTP
I wonder if it would be possible to
have SMTP/postfix listen on port 25 and say port 26
with the following setttings
* port 25 does not require AUTH
* port 26 requires AUTH
(
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello
we have a in house mail system based on postfix.
We would like to optionnaly integrate AUTH for SMTP
I wonder if it would be possible to
have SMTP/postfix listen on port 25 and say port 26
with the following setttings
* port 25 does not
you are probably better just using port 587 (submission) for auth as
it's a common thing to expect.
for example, master.cf comes pre-setup for enabling smtp auth on the
submission port.
Cheers,
Harry
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 13:30 +, fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello
we have a in
Hello,
i try to create a small policy server as a bash script. The script is
alsmost done and is working.
the only problem i have is the correct reply to postfix.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html shows:
The policy server replies with any action that is allowed in a Postfix
in master.cf file by default only the normal smtp service is enabled.
You can enable submission on port 587
Sometimes people enable smtps service (port 465), for some compatibility
with some older clients (outlook express etc) although most new clients
you can define the port.
my config
Andre H?bner:
Hello,
i try to create a small policy server as a bash script. The script is
alsmost done and is working.
the only problem i have is the correct reply to postfix.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html shows:
The policy server replies with any action that is
Hi Again,
Sorry to be a pain but I'm stuck again. If I try to send to the maillists
from any account, I get blocked instead of only the pupils so it seems
that the restricted user list is being ignored when applying the rules.
I've tried all sorts of combinations of restrictions but it's either
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:21:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Curtis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni
transport:
bo...@example.com error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
address.invalid error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient
Ok, sorry, another list-newbie :)
The problem (User unknown in virtual alias table)only happens with one rcpt
domain [cdpoolmusic.com]:
Log at /var/log/maillog :
Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/smtpd[23592]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1]
Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/smtpd[23592]:
I've been using Postfix for 9 years, and I really like it. There is
still one thing I can't seem to be able to do:
I' using the following config options:
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_domains.sql
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_maps.sql
Which smtpd services in master.cf have receive_override_options
and what are the receive_override_options settings there?
Wietse
All,
If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
for delivery.
Does Postfix have this capability?
George
_
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
think about things like dynamicmaps and other oddities of the Ubuntu
Marc Jauvin:
I've been using Postfix for 9 years, and I really like it. There is
still one thing I can't seem to be able to do:
I' using the following config options:
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:virtual_mailbox_domains.sql
virtual_mailbox_maps =
Hi Wietse, I understand this.
Here is a more complete description of my problems:
We're offering mail services for our clients, we also provide dns
services for them. So in practice, most of our customers will have
their MX record point to our mail servers by default while we provide
the
On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:56, Marc Jauvin m...@r4l.com wrote:
So how can we configure postfix so that it will realize that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX host?
1) don't top post.
2) Remove the domain from your maps.
Amavisd filters smtp mail over 10025 port on localhost:
Settings for receive_override_options are equal to
no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks
/etc/postfix/master.cf :
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
#smtp inet n - n - -
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Now, at some point if the customer decides to point their MX records to
an external mail server (whether it handles the final delivery of the
email is of no concern to us at this point), but our mail server is not
aware of the change (and still has mapping in the internal
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:16:22PM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El jue, 12-03-2009 a las 09:00 -0400, Wietse Venema escribi??:
Postfix virtual alias table lookups are documented in virtual(5).
http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html.
See also ldap_table(5) for details specific to LDAP
mhbe...@gmail.com:
Mar 12 15:32:30 host01 postfix/error[23595]: 616CE3A40CD:
to=u...@cdpoolmusic.com, relay=none, delay=0.23, delays=0.03/0.12/0/0.07,
dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table)
cdpoolmusic.com matches virtual_alias_domains
Should it match
Marc Jauvin:
virtual maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at
his domain, the email will be delivered internally instead of being
sent to his NEW external MX host.
So how can we configure postfix so that it will realize that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX
How do I go about setting up something where the to field shows the
address of the list but is still delivered to each individual user? I'm
also wondering how I preserve the original message id and reply-to-id
(or whatever that header was called).
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I mean:
postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host or not, because
it's treating the virtual mapping rules as authoritative, as far as
I know.
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified, then
we
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I mean:
postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host or not, because it's
treating the virtual mapping rules as authoritative, as far as I know.
Postfix doesn't care if it's the MX host or not, because
That's what I was afraid of... when you're hosting multi-thousands of
domains, that's not an easy task... :(
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Marc Jauvin wrote:
Well, other than postfix's virtual mapping rules, that's what I
mean: postfix has no idea if he's supposed to be MX host
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
How do I go about setting up something where the to field shows the
address of the list but is still delivered to each individual user?
I'm also wondering how I preserve the original message id and
reply-to-id (or whatever that header was called).
I highly recommend a
Marc Jauvin:
virtual maps. So at this point, if we send this customer an email at
his domain, the email will be delivered internally instead of being
sent to his NEW external MX host.
So how can we configure postfix so that it will realize that the
mail should be routed to the NEW MX host?
I am a web programmer (dealing in Ruby/Merb). I've got most of it
worked out now, including VERP (which is redirected to my own email
until things get big). I'm manually putting the headers in each email,
but the Message-Id is getting set to something else even though I
included it already.
On 12-Mar-2009, at 10:50, Marc Jauvin wrote:
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified,
then we can't remove those virtual mapping rules from our database.
$ dig mx example.com | grep -A1 ANSWER SECTION | grep MX
I suppose you could run that each day and flag domains
What would be the best way to add a bounce+ to the beginning of every
Return-Path address for outgoing
e-mail? I've been digging for two days and have not found a workable solution.
Chris
Chris Dos:
What would be the best way to add a bounce+ to the beginning of
every Return-Path address for outgoing e-mail? I've been digging
for two days and have not found a workable solution.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#canonical
Hi,
What i have to do for discard email when reverse name is google.com and from
is , Currently i''m receive 1.200 millions for email per seconds, a
bounce atack.
Thanks
Alexandre Carlim
Thanks,
We succeeded to solve this problem in this way, I create in main.cf
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_bounce_sender,
cat /etc/postfix/check_bounce_sender
check_no-bounce_domains
And:
smtpd_restriction_classes =
Chris Dos:
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
It won't add bounce+ to the beginning of every email, but you can use
VERP. It might prove more useful anyways as hosts don't always include
the to email address when sending back bounced messages. The format
is like this:
j...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk a écrit :
Hi Again,
Sorry to be a pain but I'm stuck again. If I try to send to the maillists
from any account, I get blocked instead of only the pupils so it seems
that the restricted user list is being ignored when applying the rules.
I've tried all sorts of
Sergey a écrit :
Hello.
First of all, sorry for my poor english.
How can I cofigure my postfix to receive all messages for postmaster and
not apply smtpd_*_restrictions for it? Currently I see in my log:
Mar 12 09:18:17 zero postfix/smtpd[31761]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
George Forman a écrit :
All,
If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
for delivery.
Does Postfix have this capability?
this is unclear. which bounce messages? please clarify (explict
examples). also explain what
2009/3/13 George Forman georgeforma...@hotmail.com:
If I am a secondary server hosting part of a domain.
I must route all bounce messages back to the primary service
for delivery.
Does Postfix have this capability?
Setting the primary service as the relayhost should do this on the
secondary
Jeremy Nicoll a écrit :
I am a web programmer (dealing in Ruby/Merb). I've got most of it
worked out now, including VERP (which is redirected to my own email
until things get big). I'm manually putting the headers in each email,
but the Message-Id is getting set to something else even though
2009/3/13 Marc Jauvin m...@r4l.com:
Since we have no means to know that the MX records were modified, then we
can't remove those virtual mapping rules from our database.
As others have said, you need to make sure your postfix configuration
matches the reality of the situation. As I work at a
60 matches
Mail list logo
