Can anybody help me solving this issue. I have a major setback with sendgin
mails with yahoo. Is there any parameter or any rule to be followed for
sending mails to yahoo and hotmail as they normally deffer our mails quite
oftenly.
==
Mar 24 12:40:18
2009/3/24 Ashwin Muni ashwin.m...@gmail.com:
Mar 24 12:40:18 server1 postfix/error[10100]: 61BF3CF526:
to=sandeep.ash...@yahoo.co.in, relay=none, delay=234, delays=2.5/232/0/0,
dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: conversation
with in32.mxauth.yahoo.com[202.86.5.24]
2009/3/24 Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com:
2009/3/24 Ashwin Muni ashwin.m...@gmail.com:
Also i dont know why they defer our server mails
Mar 24 12:44:47 suk1 postfix/smtp[10336]: 6B2F4CF5AD: host
a.mx.mail.yahoo.com[67.195.168.31] said: 421 Message temporarily deferred -
4.16.51.
Ashwin Muni wrote:
Can anybody help me solving this issue. I have a major setback with
sendgin
mails with yahoo. Is there any parameter or any rule to be followed for
sending mails to yahoo and hotmail as they normally deffer our mails quite
oftenly.
Hi list,
I set 2 postfix instances, one with amavisd-new, the other with no
conten-filter at all.
I'm using fallback_relay to the 2nd instance.
I upgrade my clamav today so there is an error in my conten-filter for
a moment, the mail then relayed to the 2nd instance.
my question is, if
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:14 AM, jeffs je...@speakeasy.net wrote:
[...]
However, rather than building (for me) a difficult query I
thought there might be a mechanism in Postfix which could be used to stop a
sudden increase of outbound emails.
put all outbound mail on the hold queue by
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:46:06PM +0700, ke...@auditsi.com wrote:
Hi list,
I set 2 postfix instances, one with amavisd-new, the other with no
conten-filter at all.
I'm using fallback_relay to the 2nd instance.
I upgrade my clamav today so there is an error in my conten-filter for a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:38:48AM +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
what is the directive to limit no of smtp connection to a same destination
http:www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#transport_destination_concurrency_limit
(Not Message) and what is the directive that can set no of messages per
- Original Message -
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Mail drop
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:54:07PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
dkim-milter is one program that you are asking to
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:54:17AM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
MEASURE! Find out what is slowing it down. When you know what that
is, ask the question again.
Here's a snapshot of top during a peak testing period
top - 08:45:55 up 4 days, 23:47, 1 user, load average: 2.75, 1.70, 0.73
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 87.48.217.0/28
postconf -d shows compiled-in defaults, which are overridden by settings in
main.cf. In particular, postconf -d does NOT show what settings postfix
will use.
Oh. That explains
Dear listers
[r...@smtphost ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
anvil_rate_time_unit = 60s
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter =
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directory =
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:05:52 +0100
suomi post...@ayni.com wrote:
[snip]
In the postfix log, where the php-pear-Mail-Mime client sends all mails,
for the mail in question I find the following:
Mar 20 09:00:01 smtphost postfix/smtpd[3990]: connect from
hi !
i'm a little confused about the effect of:
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit (default: 50)
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit (default: 0)*
*if this is default, why do i get this messages:Mar 24 13:51:54 womdsp
postfix/anvil[12492]: statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for
suomi wrote:
Problem is:
last friday, a person complained that no messages had been sent from
an application which sends the same message to about 40
mail-recipients including to this person himself. Messages are sent
via php-pear-Mail-Mime, which sofar has worked correctly in all cases:
suomi:
Problem is:
last friday, a person complained that no messages had been sent from an
application which sends the same message to about 40 mail-recipients
including to this person himself. Messages are sent via
php-pear-Mail-Mime, which sofar has worked correctly in all cases:
i want to make sure everything is accepted by this mailserver,
but sometimes an email still gets delivered to the old server wich is mx 20
in dns now, i thought anvil-rejection is the cause.
thank you
2009/3/24 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:34:20PM +0100, Leutnant Steiner wrote:
i want to make sure everything is accepted by this mailserver,
but sometimes an email still gets delivered to the old server wich is mx 20
in dns now, i thought anvil-rejection is the cause.
Postfix logs all rejected mail.
hm, ok i checked
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max connection
count 1 for (smtp:194.121.2.5) at Mar 24 17:43:01
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max cache size 1 at
Mar 24 17:43:01
this would be a server which i would like to recieve mail from !
Leutnant Steiner wrote:
Mar 24 13:57:05 womdsp postfix/smtpd[12654]: A83409C8092:
client=m1smtp01.kmweg.de http://m1smtp01.kmweg.de[194.121.2.5]
Mar 24 13:57:36 womdsp postfix/smtpd[12654]: disconnect from
m1smtp01.kmweg.de http://m1smtp01.kmweg.de[194.121.2.5]
Mar 24 14:00:56 womdsp
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 17:59:24 Leutnant Steiner wrote:
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max connection
count 1 for (smtp:194.121.2.5) at Mar 24 17:43:01
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max cache size 1
at Mar 24 17:43:01
this would be a
Leutnant Steiner wrote:
hm, ok i checked
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max connection
count 1 for (smtp:194.121.2.5) at Mar 24 17:43:01
Mar 24 17:46:21 womdsp postfix/anvil[14773]: statistics: max cache size
1 at Mar 24 17:43:01
This is just an information message
I have a small Squirrelmail server, using Postfix Dovecot. I am
trying to limit the amount of mail a user can get. The
mailbox_size_limit value does not seem to be being honored. I am
using the Maildir directory format.
From googling, it appears that mailbox_size_limit applies to a
single file
Hi
Recovering this thread, finally was commented the check_client_access and
the service was recovered. But in this server are three domains accepted but
only checks if y use the most important domain smtp to validate. If I use
others appears the same message of error.
For example:
If I use to
So, you send a lot of mails to XYZ Consulting? I'm sure that their
xyz.com domain can't be causing that many issues? Or were you just
using that as a generic example? If so, example.com is traditionally
used for such uses.
Regarding the hard bounces, a hard bounce is when a mail is
Hi Everyone,
We have a Email Archive system which is designed for a Email Journaling (from
Exchange). Is there a feature (perhaps a milter), within Postfix that can
achieve the same feature?
note: using postfix-2.5.6 on Centos 5.2
Regards,
Craig
26 matches
Mail list logo
