Refering to the earlier subjects on RPMs and 2.6:
I have Suse 11.1 which includes Postfix 2.5.5. It is not easy to
uninstall that (YAST wants to replace it with EXIM or SENDMAIL) due to
dependencies. Is it possible to just upgrade it if I manually compile
2.6.1 and replace the old one? Or
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Thomas Bergstam wrote:
I have Suse 11.1 which includes Postfix 2.5.5. It is not easy to
uninstall that (YAST wants to replace it with EXIM or SENDMAIL) due to
dependencies. Is it possible to just upgrade it if I manually compile
2.6.1 and replace the old one? Or
Thomas Bergstam schrieb:
Refering to the earlier subjects on RPMs and 2.6:
I have Suse 11.1 which includes Postfix 2.5.5. It is not easy to
uninstall that (YAST wants to replace it with EXIM or SENDMAIL) due to
dependencies. Is it possible to just upgrade it if I manually compile
2.6.1 and
Hello,
I typed the address in a message wrong. Pine copied ot to the
sendmail folder anyway. But postfix saw the message that the
address was wrong and put it in the mailq. (Fair enough).
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
Regards,
Hans.
sjm...@pobox.com (Simon J Mudd) writes:
For those interested I've updated the packages and you should be able
to find:
postfix-2.6.0-1.src.rpm and
postfix-2.6.0-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Updated to 2.6.1 as I hadn't seen Wietse's 2.6.1 update.
Simon
* lists.postfix-us...@duinheks.nl lists.postfix-us...@duinheks.nl:
Hello,
I typed the address in a message wrong. Pine copied ot to the
sendmail folder anyway. But postfix saw the message that the
address was wrong and put it in the mailq. (Fair enough).
Question is: can I resnd the message
lists.postfix-us...@duinheks.nl:
Hello,
I typed the address in a message wrong. Pine copied ot to the
sendmail folder anyway. But postfix saw the message that the
address was wrong and put it in the mailq. (Fair enough).
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if
sjm...@pobox.com (Simon J Mudd) writes:
For those interested I've updated the packages and you should be able
to find:
postfix-2.6.0-1.src.rpm and
postfix-2.6.0-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Updated to 2.6.1 as I hadn't seen Wietse's 2.6.1 update.
Simon
Thank you Simon.
Chas.
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
Another possiblity is anti-virus software on the sending machine.
I use Linux Debian squeeze/sid - AFAIK I have no any antivirus software.
I, like everyone I'm sure, have seen a large uptick in spam attempts
to Message-Ids as if they were email addresses. Of course they are all
rejected as unknown users, but is it worth putting in a rule to catch
these specifically?
--
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges.
I have the following:
main.cf in smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/helo_checks.pcre,
in helo_checks.pcre:
/(lan|home|example|local)$/ REJECT Mailserver name in
private namespace
but in logs:
May 23 14:48:17 mail postfix/smtpd[30899]:
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Ralf,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt aan postfix-users@postfix.org:
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
RH I fail to see how this is a postfix
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Wietse,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Wietse Venema aan Postfix users:
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
WV I assume that the message is still queued because
Sthu Pous a écrit :
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
Another possiblity is anti-virus software on the sending machine.
I use Linux Debian squeeze/sid - AFAIK I have no any antivirus software.
whatever you use, you have something that breaks ESMTP, and in
particular STARTTLS.
LuKreme a écrit :
I, like everyone I'm sure, have seen a large uptick in spam attempts to
Message-Ids as if they were email addresses. Of course they are all
rejected as unknown users, but is it worth putting in a rule to catch
these specifically?
put
reject_unlisted_recipient
On Sun, 24 May 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I, like everyone I'm sure, have seen a large uptick in spam attempts to
Message-Ids as if they were email addresses. Of course they are all
rejected as unknown users, but is it worth putting in a rule to catch
these specifically?
That wouldn't add
* mouss mouss+nob...@netoyen.net:
Sthu Pous a écrit :
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
Another possiblity is anti-virus software on the sending machine.
I use Linux Debian squeeze/sid - AFAIK I have no any antivirus software.
whatever you use, you have something that
LuKreme a écrit :
I have the following:
main.cf in smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/helo_checks.pcre,
in helo_checks.pcre:
/(lan|home|example|local)$/ REJECT Mailserver name in
private namespace
but in logs:
May 23 14:48:17 mail
I have a primary and backup mx both running postfix with assp in front.
Assp performs all spam and recipient verification checks which is working
fine except for a limitation in assp whereby ldap recipient checks are
limited to one server so in the case where these two gateways are authoritative
On Sun, 24 May 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have the following:
main.cf in smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/helo_checks.pcre,
in helo_checks.pcre:
/(lan|home|example|local)$/ REJECT Mailserver name in
private namespace
but in logs:
Hello,
My postfix manages mail for a number of domains, e.g. gtwm.co.uk. The
MX records are set so that mail is filtered through a third party spam
catcher.
However the server has one domain that is the 'main' hostname of the
server, listed in /etc/hosts:
62.73.174.227
Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists a écrit :
Hello,
My postfix manages mail for a number of domains, e.g. gtwm.co.uk. The MX
records are set so that mail is filtered through a third party spam
catcher.
However the server has one domain that is the 'main' hostname of the
server, listed in
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists
oliver.li...@gtwm.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
My postfix manages mail for a number of domains, e.g. gtwm.co.uk. The MX
records are set so that mail is filtered through a third party spam catcher.
However the server has one domain that is
On 24-May-2009, at 15:05, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Hm, that warn does not correspond to what you purportedly have in
your
smtpd_recipient_restrictions; it should have been an outright
rejection.
I'd just changed the WARN to REJECT today and the log entry was from
yesterday. It was while
On 24-May-2009, at 15:02, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
May 23 14:48:17 mail postfix/smtpd[30899]: NOQUEUE: warn: RCPT from
201-88-100-143.gnace704.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br[201.88.100.143]:
Dynamic DSL looking address; from=subsidize...@maww.com
to=consorti...@domain3.example proto=ESMTP
Hi,
In 20090522135110.ga...@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net
how to bypass milters, whitelist hosts on Fri, 22 May 2009 15:51:10 +0200,
martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
how can I bypass smtpd_milters for certain hosts?
I have asked a related question previously [0], and the only
On Sun, 24 May 2009, lists.postfix-us...@duinheks.nl wrote:
WV I assume that the message is still queued because DNS lookup
WV fails or because the (wrong) destination is not reachable.
Correct. The domain dhs.nl does not exist. But it's such a habit
to type that..
The dhs.nl domain has
* Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
* mouss mouss+nob...@netoyen.net:
and please remove the
smtpd_banner = The eMail Service
because it is invalid. The banner must contain the hostname... etc.
and it must contain ESMTP or the client will not know the server can speak
* Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists oliver.li...@gtwm.co.uk:
Hello,
My postfix manages mail for a number of domains, e.g. gtwm.co.uk. The MX
records are set so that mail is filtered through a third party spam
catcher.
However the server has one domain that is the 'main' hostname of the
29 matches
Mail list logo
