On 1681 0, Stuart Matthews s...@eff.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am the systems administrator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. I
have been having a problem with getting spam that has a from of, for
example, t...@eff.org (which is a valid email address). I would like my
mail server to
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:39:15PM -0700, William Yardley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:25:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Maybe setting $bounce_queue_lifetime to 0 but leaving
$maximal_queue_lifetime set to 5d+ would do the trick?
[The main issue with this approach is that it will get rid
Hi,
A lot of spam comes from certain ip ranges (e.g. west africa) through
relays (large ISPs) that would be too onerous to block. To filter these
I am presently matching:
/^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.(IP RANGE IN
REGEX)\b/
in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But
Here's an idea.. maybe it's useful for someone, so I post it here.
I'm setting up a local mail server to cache remote service's mail for
faster access on the LAN. The remote server has an up-to-date SPF
record that is updated whenever the sending IP ranges change. I want
to limit unauthenticated
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
On Mon, June 15, 2009 12:01 pm, Stéphane MERLE said:
Can I, at least, add the from in the logs ?
Jun 15 11:59:01 smtp postfix/smtp[3061]: 683EB37AECA3:
to=kdkdlem...@live.fr, relay=mx1.hotmail.com[65.55.92.136]:25,
conn_use=91, delay=401662,
The following is concept; I don't have the script yet ready, but
it'll be easy to write with your favorite scripting language:
---
1. get your remote sender's current SPF record:
dig yourremotesender.com txt tempfile
2. parse the result in tempfile with regex:
Thanks, I'll look into that; it'll simplify it a bit.
Anything that is parsed from text output is obviously not super solid
but for this application it'll suffice. The MX for the business
domains in question is an external service that takes care of spam
filtering, address consolidation, etc. The
2009/6/25 Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org:
/^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.(IP RANGE IN
REGEX)\b/
in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But converting IP ranges to regex'es
is time consuming and error prone.
Is there a way to use a cidr
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:14:29PM +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/6/25 Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org:
/^((Received|X-Originating-IP):.+\b(124\.120\.1\.(IP RANGE IN
REGEX)\b/
in pcre:/etc/postfix/header_access. But converting IP ranges to regex'es
Hello guys
Before all, please forget my bad English.
I'm newbie in postfix. I want to ask you a question. Let me explain the
situation.
I have a dialup link. When the link goes up automatically executes a postqueue
-f command and mail is delivered. The problem is link speed, I'm getting
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to add a header to the messages before they are
delivered to a multidrop mailbox with virtual aliases.
After searching the postfix-users list archives I've found that this subject
has been already discused here and I've found a message from Zoltan Balogh
that seemed
Ing. Davy Leon:
Hello guys
Before all, please forget my bad English.
I'm newbie in postfix. I want to ask you a question. Let me explain
the situation.
I have a dialup link. When the link goes up automatically executes
a postqueue -f command and mail is delivered. The problem is link
Thanks Wietse
I'm checking the links right now.
Thanks my friend
David
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: slow link
Ing. Davy Leon:
Hello guys
Before all,
Hi,
I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find any
information.
I need to customize the bounce behavior for the following:
1. If a bounce message is created because it can't deliver to a specified
list of email addresses we don't want a bounce returned.
2. If a
Hi, I am sure someone can clarify it for me.
A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in
outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems
to doing -400 (EDT).
by postfixmta.domain.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1257AB5
for myu...@mydomain.net;
William Yardley wrote:
I was thinking that setting $defer_transports might avoid
$maximal_queue_lifetime, but from my tests, looks like that's not the
case. What about holding the messages? Same thing?
Messages on hold never expire (postfix ignores messages in the
hold queue). When they are
On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in
outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems
to doing -400 (EDT).
Hmmm. 4 hours. Are you using greylisting?
--
Glenn English
g...@slsware.com
Noel Jones wrote:
If not, they *should not* be connecting to your smtps port; their mail
server is misconfigured and it's not your problem.
This was exactly the problem. I did some troubleshooting with the mail
admin of the sending server. One of their servers was attempting to
connect on
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe g...@slsware.com wrote:
On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in
outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems
to doing -400 (EDT).
Hmmm. 4 hours. Are
* Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com:
We are, but these aren't even going out. There is a transport map which
directs it to internal exchange servers.
I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from.
Please show the exact header... and 2 lines before and after.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
On 6/25/09 12:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from.
It's EDT, not EDIT. It means that the local time (Eastern Daylight Time)
is 4 hours less than GMT...
--
Glenn English
g...@slsware.com
On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe g...@slsware.com wrote:
On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in
outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at
Hi all,
That seems to have done it... banging my head against the problem all
because of a typo.
Thanks,
Stu
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Stuart Matthews wrote:
I have already tried editing /usr/local/etc/postfix/access, adding:
eff.orgREJECTyou can't send mail as me!
And of course I
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe
g...@slsware.comg...@slsware.comwrote:
On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
A device uses postfix relay
I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and
friends, but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT,
and there's a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're
seeing a 4 hour time change in your headers in mail being passed between
*nix and MS.
Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly --
thanks Barney!):
---
#!/bin/sh
ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr
NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp
dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o
'ip4:[0-9./]+' | sed 's/^ip4://' | sed 's/$/
Ville Walveranta wrote:
It works except that the Postfix refresh message
(postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system) is
displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any
idea how I could hide it?
It's probably writing to stderr,
postfix reload 2/dev/null #
Ville Walveranta wrote:
Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly --
thanks Barney!):
---
#!/bin/sh
ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr
NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp
dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o
'ip4:[0-9./]+' |
Ville Walveranta wrote:
Here's the completed script (the IP/CIDR extract worked perfectly --
thanks Barney!):
---
#!/bin/sh
ORIGINAL=/usr/local/etc/postfix/tables/client_access_maps.cidr
NEW=/tmp/postfix_clients.tmp
dig +short senderdomain.net TXT | grep 'v=spf1' | egrep -o
Perfect! Thanks all!!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:17 PM, ghe g...@slsware.com wrote:
I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and friends,
but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT, and there's
a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're seeing a 4 hour
time
Linux Addict wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
mailto:sa...@tandon.net wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com
mailto:linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe
Original Message
Subject: Re: Header Time
From: Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com
I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with
yahoo and gmail as well. I see the same pattern.
Looks to me message leaves postfix with updated time stamp. �Is there
LuKreme a écrit :
On 22-Jun-2009, at 18:29, mouss wrote:
Is there anyway to, if not outright reject anyone whose DNS shows up as
unknown to at least tempfail them with a Ooops, your DNS is not
resolving, try back later or something?
if you insist, you could use one of
George Forman a écrit :
Hi,
I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find
any information.
I need to customize the bounce behavior for the following:
1. If a bounce message is created because it can't deliver to a specified
list of email addresses we don't want
Bernardo Pons a écrit :
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to add a header to the messages before they are
delivered to a multidrop mailbox with virtual aliases.
After searching the postfix-users list archives I've found that
this subject has been already discused here and I've found a
On 25-Jun-2009, at 14:33, Ville Walveranta wrote:
It works except that the Postfix refresh message
(postfix/postfix-script: refreshing the Postfix mail system) is
displayed despite of the attempt to redirect it to /dev/null? Any
idea how I could hide it?
That refresh message is output on
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many
of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My
assumption from reading the
I have the following in my main.cf:
MAINCF
#smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes
mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre
smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist
check_greylist = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023
MAINCF
(there are no leading spaces or stray ,'s, I
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:56:34 +0200
From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: customize bounce behavior
George Forman a écrit :
Hi,
I apologize if this has already been covered but I can't seem to find
any information.
I need to customize the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What I?m noticing is many
of the client requests do not
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I have the following in my main.cf:
MAINCF
#smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes
mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre
smtpd_restriction_classes = check_greylist
check_greylist = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023
MAINCF
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and
returns
an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Header Time
From: Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com
I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with yahoo
and gmail as well. I see the same pattern.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
before the queue-id.
My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an
instance can exist *before* the first recipient is
Hi there,
i have a little problem to change time of logswitch for the postfix-logfile
mail in /var/log/.
the logswitch yet is every day at 11:00 am. The switch should take place at
midnight.
i can't find any parameter in main.cf or master.cf
Kind regards
Oliver
46 matches
Mail list logo
