Benny Pedersen schrieb:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:50, Rodman Frowert wrote:
I wish there was a message board on the Postfix main site instead of JUST
the mailing list. Would making find things that are asked a lot quite
easier. Some of the mailing list archives don't have search functions...
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Thanks
Ram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 August 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
I have a virtual_alias map setup that uses this mySQL query;
SELECT rcpt FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%s' OR alias = (SELECT
ram:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Only via the policy daemon protocol.
Wietse
The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
or maybe in here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Specifically the reject_authenticated_* and reject_unauthenticated_*
forms, would greatly
On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:15:08 johnea wrote:
The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
or maybe in here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Specifically the reject_authenticated_*
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, ram wrote:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Yes, with a policy service called in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions.
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:15:08 johnea wrote:
The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
or maybe in here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Specifically the
Below:
* Findings of fact
* Representative messages from syslog
* postconf -n
* Output of tshark -- and if someone wants to complain about the length
of this message, they should consider all the bandwidth wasted by people
who quote entire messages in their replies :-)
Findings of Fact
1.
Andrew T. Robinson:
delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't modified for privacy reasons, Google is
tarpitting your
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
[snip]
I haven't even heard the term reverse path before. Most likely it's
someone mixing it up with the more common return path, so you can
assume they're synonyms.
I'm sure you heard it before, but forgot that. it's the term used in RFC
821 (and still used in
Matthew D. Fuller a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:03:43PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Clunk Werclick, and lo! it spake thus:
My apologies for the terse caveat. As I understand it, there are
some external mail services that roaming users may use that forward
mail into your Postfix claiming
Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrew T. Robinson:
delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't modified for privacy
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
i use ldap search all the time for testing but i would like to see how
postfix queries and replies.
% man 1 postmap
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE files.
And grossly inefficient. And rude.
15 matches
Mail list logo
