Victor Duchovni wrote:
You don't postmap regexp tables. More importantly you are aliasing this
address local-part in all remote domains to be local. That's wrong.
You must list the local domains one by one in the transport table
u...@a.example.com local_no_forward
On 2010-06-23 12:34 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination
permit_sasl_authenticated
Under most circumstances, reject_unauth_destination should go *after*
permit_sasl_authenticated, or your sasl authenticated
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:39:02AM +0200, Mariusz Kie?pi?ski wrote:
That the real problem. I that case what option can be used to stop looking
into these files.
http://www.postfix.org/local.8.html
--
Viktor.
Keld Simonsen:
You configre the program that invokes the Postfix sendmail
command, so that it invokes the command like so:
sendmail -XV -f owner-listname other-arguments...
With Majordomo the sendmail command line is in a config file, buried
in Perl syntax. Other list managers
Stan,
Thanks for the quick reply. All I can say is WOW.
I did poke around on this CentOS install and am not seeing a config file
like you have but perhaps this is it:
[r...@hosting1 ~]# find / -name postgrey
/usr/sbin/postgrey
/etc/rc.d/init.d/postgrey
/var/spool/postfix/postgrey
Stan,
Ok.. I did find where CentOS would store the config file. It appears that it
puts it in /etc/sysconfig/postgrey
I should have read the init script a little closer. So, I copied yours and
pasted it into that file and should be ready there but my question still
stands about whether or not a
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 16:46, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
A word of caution: don't assume that everyone browses the web using a
graphical web browser. People still browse from the command line, and more
importantly, screen readers for the disabled. If you're going to hide an
On 23 Jun 2010, at 06:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
DKIM checks are pretty much useless for killing spam
Currently true, but hopefully soon to change… Spamhaus is releasing two new
DNSWLs in about 4 weeks time, one of which specifically validates DKIM domains
against a list of verified known good
On 23/06/10 16:28, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 16:46, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
A word of caution: don't assume that everyone browses the web using a
graphical web browser. People still browse from the command line, and more
importantly, screen readers for
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:21:21 +0200
Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net articulated:
Keep in mind: automated harvesters can impersonate regular people (or
browsers), but they cannot think like one.
Which, in some instances, might be considered a good thing.
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
I think maybe I'm missing something in the documentation, as I was
sure Postfix could do this. What I want to do is take a list of
things, such as the list of domains for virtual_mailbox_domains, right
out of a file. This isn't a map. But do I still need to do a map,
anyway?
On 6/23/2010 10:52 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
I think maybe I'm missing something in the documentation, as I was
sure Postfix could do this. What I want to do is take a list of
things, such as the list of domains for virtual_mailbox_domains, right
out of a file. This isn't a map. But do I still
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:52:31AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
I think maybe I'm missing something in the documentation, as I
was sure Postfix could do this.
You are, it can.
What I want to do is take a list of things, such as the list of
domains for virtual_mailbox_domains, right out of a
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:01, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
The documentation shows what syntax is supported for each parameter. Some
-- but not all -- parameters support a plain file list.
You can start here:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_mailbox_domains
Been
On 06/22/2010 10:56 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jason Bailey, Sun Advocate Webmaster put forth on 6/22/2010 10:32 PM:
(Note: I do have to disclose one piece of information. Recently our
server was automatically blacklisted by our ISP for spam that was being
relayed through our system from a
On 6/23/2010 11:06 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:01, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
The documentation shows what syntax is supported for each parameter. Some
-- but not all -- parameters support a plain file list.
You can start here:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:20:47AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
From the mydestination docs:
a type:table lookup table is matched when a name matches a lookup key
(the lookup result is ignored).
All map files require a key result format. In the case of a map file
used as a list, such as
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:20, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
From the mydestination docs:
a type:table lookup table is matched when a name matches a lookup key (the
lookup result is ignored).
All map files require a key result format. In the case of a map file
used as a list,
On 6/23/2010 11:30 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:20, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
From the mydestination docs:
a type:table lookup table is matched when a name matches a lookup key (the
lookup result is ignored).
All map files require a key result format. In
How would I do this for smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
That question makes no sense. Rephrase.
I was looking for a general solution. I picked an example. But I
apparently picked a bad example because the solution seems to be
example specific. I guess I better not pick examples, anymore.
On 6/23/2010 11:40 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
How would I do this for smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
That question makes no sense. Rephrase.
I was looking for a general solution. I picked an example. But I
apparently picked a bad example because the solution seems to be
example specific. I
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:40:30PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
How would I do this for smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
That question makes no sense. ?Rephrase.
I was looking for a general solution. I picked an example. But I
apparently picked a bad example because the solution seems to
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:44, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
There is no include syntax for main.cf itself.
You can use a Makefile to build a main.cf from proto files, or use postconf
-e ... for program-controlled editing of main.cf.
You'd still have to make it reload for
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:46, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Most Postfix services (i.e. delivery
agents and inet services) restart automatically after processing
a ~100 requests, and reloads are not generally needed for parameters
that touch these services.
Hmmm.
The default for smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient is yes. How does that
affect using reject_unlisted_recipient in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions? Does it mean it is effectively included
whether you include it or not? I presume I still need to list other
things like smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
* Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com:
Been trying to figure that out. I'm wanting to use CDB. But it
wasn'tfile.out taking it. I guess what I need to do is give each domain a
dummy value.
awk '{printf(%s OK\n,$1)}' file file.out
postmap file.out
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT |
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:15:02 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
The default for smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient is yes. How does that
affect using reject_unlisted_recipient in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions? Does it mean it is effectively included
whether you include it or not?
On 6/23/2010 12:15 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
The default for smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient is yes. How does that
affect using reject_unlisted_recipient in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
It allows you to control *when* the check is performed.
Does it mean it is effectively included
whether
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 13:55, Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I use Dovecot for virtual transport also. I don't remember exactly why;
however, I had to place this in the main.cf file:
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
By the way, your smtpd_banner may make you feel
On 6/23/2010 1:12 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 13:55, Jerrypostfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I use Dovecot for virtual transport also. I don't remember exactly why;
however, I had to place this in the main.cf file:
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
Does
For the case, mail server is not necessarily a Postfix. Yes it is a
workaround to find different myhostname variable setting then hostname
of the real mail server.
internet - postfix relay -mail server
mail.mydomain.com
On 06/23/2010 11:21 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Actually, when using a visual browser, people still can use their own
colouring (again, the visually impaired). What you are suggesting is
generating browser-specific output. This practise has been tried,
tested, and discarded in webdesign country for
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:12, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
It's about controlling when the check takes place.
Some people like to reject unlisted recipients before other (maybe more
expensive) checks. Some people like to reject connections for RBL or
blacklist before checking
Is virtual_mailbox_maps just for virtual(8) (the postfix virtual
delivery agent ... which I am not using) ... or is it also used for
smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient even when virtual_transport =
something else like dovecot? Can it just have an OK value to mean
yeah, this is a real recipient here,
On 6/23/2010 2:12 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:12, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
It's about controlling when the check takes place.
Some people like to reject unlisted recipients before other (maybe more
expensive) checks. Some people like to reject connections
First of all thank you so much for helping me. I found it was a hacked
user account in the e-mail system. Not only did they use his e-mail
account they used his webmail too. Once I changed his password. As of
yet they have gave up trying. I'm amazed I did not catch this sooner.
I did catch
A while back I setup a helo.regexp file. I have changed it around a
bit. I'm trying to stop e-mail that is sent to/from the same e-mail
address but not my system. The idea was if they are sending mail to
themselves from my ip address. It would be blocked.
Example from my test server:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:39:58PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
Is virtual_mailbox_maps just for virtual(8) (the postfix virtual
delivery agent ... which I am not using) ... or is it also used for
smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient even when virtual_transport =
something else like dovecot? Can it
I'm trying to test a new .cf file that uses ldap with postmap, and I
noticed that it fails to actually honor the fields set in the file. I'm
going off of the documentation found at
http://www.postfix.org/LDAP_README.html#example_group.
[zim...@freelancer conf]$ postmap -q
--On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:15 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
File names must start with / or ..
Thanks. It looks like the online documentation needs updating to match
this.
postmap -q global_us...@zimbra.com ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-groups.cf
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:20:34PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:15 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
File names must start with / or ..
Thanks. It looks like the online documentation needs updating to match
this.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 17:06, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:39:58PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
Is virtual_mailbox_maps just for virtual(8) (the postfix virtual
delivery agent ... which I am not using) ... or is it also used for
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:24:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
I'm happy to naswer questions about Postfix in the limited time that
I have. If you need custom work on other applications you learn to
do it yourself, or you find someone else.
That is certainly an understandable position, and I
Josh Cason a écrit :
A while back I setup a helo.regexp file. I have changed it around a bit.
I'm trying to stop e-mail that is sent to/from the same e-mail address
but not my system. The idea was if they are sending mail to themselves
from my ip address. It would be blocked.
Example from
Tom Hendrikx a écrit :
On 23/06/10 16:28, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 16:46, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
A word of caution: don't assume that everyone browses the web using a
graphical web browser. People still browse from the command line, and more
Hi all,
I've encountered a problem that I'd really appreciate some help with.
We've been running postfix (v2.4.5) for a while in our DMZ, it handles
email for three domains, one is delivered locally to the postfix
machine, the other two are forwarded inside the firewall to one of two
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 12:47:50 +1000, Hal Douglas wrote:
Domain2.edu smtp:[10.2.3.5]
Domain2 has recently been signed up for a cloud spam scanning service,
so our postfix host is no longer MX for this domain, the spam scanning
service is MX and forwards mail to out
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:20:23AM +0200, mouss wrote:
This mail is coming from postini. if you use postini, there's nothing
you can do with the envelope (and even if you do content filtering, you
shouldn't reject mail. it's too late).
Postini implement an SMTP proxy, not a store-and-forward
48 matches
Mail list logo
