Can I configure the bounce template to include the original subject
inside the subject of the NDR.
The bounce man page does not mention original subject anywhere.
Thanks
Ram
For now almost a week without sorbs and wothout spam.
Remebered that the metter I was installed sorbs list was many forged
freemail spams. That time I've done client/hello/sender match check for
a list of free mail services (discussed on this list). And I was also
advised to add sorbs, b/c all
Hello,
I am in a case, where I need to configure a postfix daemon for acting as an
SMTP server, where some spam-filtering and some anti-virus would run in
parallel in the box. This would be a help, for a local ISP, to control spam
relayed outside from his own network and thus avoiding IPs to
Ramprasad:
Can I configure the bounce template to include the original subject
inside the subject of the NDR.
The bounce man page does not mention original subject anywhere.
If it is not in the documentation, then it is not supported.
As you correctly observed, the subject and more is in the
Le 01/11/2010 10:36, Nicholas Sideris a écrit :
Hello,
I am in a case, where I need to configure a postfix daemon for acting as an
SMTP server, where some spam-filtering and some anti-virus would run in
parallel in the box. This would be a help, for a local ISP, to control spam
relayed
Hello everyone. Im using postfix 2.5.5 and im trying to use the
singleinstancestore of cyrus to hardlink mails instead of having one copy
of every recipient.
To make this work, I had to change the:
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
local_transport =
to
gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar:
local_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
default_destination_recipient_limit = 60
isn't working...
As documented, the local_destination_recipient_limit setting has
precedence over the default_destination_recipient_limit setting.
Wietse
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Nicholas Sideris wrote:
Hello,
I am in a case, where I need to configure a postfix daemon for acting
as an SMTP server, where some spam-filtering and some anti-virus would
run in parallel in the box. This would be a help, for a local ISP, to
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar wrote:
Hello everyone. Im using postfix 2.5.5 and im trying to use the
singleinstancestore of cyrus to hardlink mails instead of having one copy
of every recipient.
To make this work, I had to change the:
mailbox_transport =
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:13:53PM -0300, gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar wrote:
Hello everyone. Im using postfix 2.5.5 and im trying to use the
singleinstancestore of cyrus to hardlink mails instead of having one copy
of every recipient.
This is only possible if you use LMTP delivery directly,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar wrote:
Hello everyone. Im using postfix 2.5.5 and im trying to use the
singleinstancestore of cyrus to hardlink mails instead of having one copy
of every recipient.
To make this work, I had to change the:
mailbox_transport =
Out of curiosity I started to play around with Postfix and PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL recommends prepared statements to speed up queries (by ~%20).
As I understand it prepared statements must be defined once when a DB
session starts and they will be available only to the particular client that
Victor Duchovni put forth on 11/1/2010 12:27 PM:
- Deploy something similar to the Symantec 8600 (aka Turntide)
SMTP traffic shaping appliance, that can rate limit outgoing
spam without rerouting the SMTP connection (limitation:
it can't see through STARTTLS).
Is this
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 03:30:57PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
To make this work, I had to change the:
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
local_transport =
to
mailbox_transport =
local_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
As
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:43:05PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Victor Duchovni put forth on 11/1/2010 12:27 PM:
- Deploy something similar to the Symantec 8600 (aka Turntide)
SMTP traffic shaping appliance, that can rate limit outgoing
spam without rerouting the SMTP
Nick I have a simple and elegant solution that has been working for
years. I am using postfix, spamassassin with spampd proxy server and
god-forbid, a purchase piece of software for antivirus from Command
Central called Vexira. It is a simple setup and has worked for us.
On 11/1/2010 5:36
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 07:35:44PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Out of curiosity I started to play around with Postfix and PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL recommends prepared statements to speed up queries (by ~%20).
As I understand it prepared statements must be defined once when a DB
session
On 11/01/2010 07:35 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Out of curiosity I started to play around with Postfix and PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL recommends prepared statements to speed up queries (by ~%20).
From the 8.0 manual:
Prepared statements have the largest performance advantage when a single
Jeroen,
thanks for the detailed answer. Please read my annotations below.
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
On 11/01/2010 07:35 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Out of curiosity I started to play around with Postfix and PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL recommends prepared statements to speed up queries
On 11/01/2010 08:40 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Jeroen,
thanks for the detailed answer. Please read my annotations below.
* Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl:
On 11/01/2010 07:35 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Out of curiosity I started to play around with Postfix and PostgreSQL.
It might be worth checking out the pre_prepare module:
http://preprepare.projects.postgresql.org/README.html
Cheers,
Ken
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:45:17PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/01/2010 08:40 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Jeroen,
thanks for the detailed answer. Please read my
On 10/31/2010 10:21 AM, sunhux G wrote:
I'll need the exact commands in a Shell script to send email
to x...@yahoo.com mailto:x...@yahoo.com y...@gmail.com
mailto:y...@gmail.com with a log file attached
to it.
I believe you're looking for the 'sendmail' command.
Hi Stan,
1. What are your specific failure concerns with your
primary site?
Network failure? Host failure? Storage hardware
failure?
You have a great suggestion assuming the data center functions well.
the data center primary site failure means that the data center
itself failed, meaning
Peter put forth on 11/1/2010 6:51 PM:
Hi Stan,
1. What are your specific failure concerns with your
primary site?
Network failure? Host failure? Storage hardware
failure?
You have a great suggestion assuming the data center functions well.
the data center primary site failure means
24 matches
Mail list logo
