On 15/01/2013 14:11, Charles Bradshaw wrote:
Hi Patrick
I would do as you ask, but it's bad security to download anything from a
mailing list and just run it. Especially something as long and complex as
gen-auth, at which I can only have a quick and un-informed look.
Given that I don't know
Hello, I'm using:
# cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
# rpm -qa | grep post
postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64
on 2 servers: preferans.de and (yes, funny name)
static.103.78.9.176.clients.your-server.de
I own several domains and would like all
incoming mails addressing those domains
to
Alexander Farber:
And have opened port 25 in the firewall:
# grep -w 25 /etc/sysconfig/iptables
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp -m multiport --dports
25,22 -j ACCEPT
But now when I send a mail to s...@videoskat.de
there is nothing to see in postfix logs:
Nothing happens
Thanks for replying -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Alexander Farber:
And have opened port 25 in the firewall:
But now when I send a mail to s...@videoskat.de
there is nothing to see in postfix logs:
Nothing happens unless a connection is made.
Am 15.01.2013 14:10, schrieb Alexander Farber:
Thanks for replying -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Alexander Farber:
And have opened port 25 in the firewall:
But now when I send a mail to s...@videoskat.de
there is nothing to see in postfix
On 1/15/2013 3:10 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
sorry for the stupid question, but how to use
tcpdump to check for incoming connections?
I've come up only with these commands sofar:
# netstat -an |grep -w 25
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
# iptables
Fred Ho:
While other incoming mails are delivered, these incoming mails are
slowly being spooled for hours and the file size are growing:
...
total 106988
106MB in the queue is a non-trivial amount,
-rw--- 1 postfix postfix 43028480 Jan 15 09:40 952BA7F1D
-rw--- 1 postfix postfix
Tom
I'm a complete beginner at this, just 67 years old, so you will please excuse
me if I comment on your response.
Obviously I didn't know what Gen-Auth is, so thanks for the heads-up.
As far as biting hands is concerned, I respectfully suggest you read what I
said before you put in your two
Am 15.01.2013 14:31, schrieb Alexander Farber:
Thank you, I've come a bit further -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
wrote:
The first problem is that you are not listening on the right IP address.
use:
inet_interfaces = all
I've added this line
Hello -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
so the domain videoskat.de is not listed in your postfix config
mydestination
local_recipient_maps
did you read any documentation or are you starting blindly
from the centos-defaults and try to figure all
Hi,
This is the external mail gateway which direct the incoming messages to the
backend mail server which do the actual delivery. This is defined in the
transport file as:ss-intl.com smtp:[192.168.1.21]
I have checked on the SMARTCTL on the disks, and nothing found.
Any way to find out the
Alexander Farber:
Hello -
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
so the domain videoskat.de is not listed in your postfix config
mydestination
local_recipient_maps
did you read any documentation or are you starting blindly
from the
Fred Ho:
Hi,
This is the external mail gateway which direct the incoming messages
to the backend mail server which do the actual delivery. This is
defined in the transport file as:ss-intl.com smtp:[192.168.1.21]
What are the typical data rates for small and for large messages?
You get
Hi,
Here's the watchlog from yesterday and I extracted a few entries. It didn't
include the mail size though, but certainly it's slow when the mail size is
over hundred K bytes.The Linux server looks normal, just don't understand where
the problem is.
Here's one of the incoming message still in
Wietse Venema:
Fred Ho:
Hi,
This is the external mail gateway which direct the incoming messages
to the backend mail server which do the actual delivery. This is
defined in the transport file as:ss-intl.com smtp:[192.168.1.21]
What are the typical data rates for small and for large
* Charles Bradshaw b...@bradcan.homelinux.com:
Hi Patrick
I would do as you ask, but it's bad security to download anything from a
mailing list and just run it. Especially something as long and complex as
gen-auth, at which I can only have a quick and un-informed look.
Given that I don't
Fred Ho:
Hi,
Here's the watchlog from yesterday and I extracted a few entries.
It didn't include the mail size though
I'll wait for the sizes, then.
Assuming that these are Postfix logging on the RECEIVING machine
where mail is arriving slowly:
delays=16369/0/0/0.51, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
Hi Wietse,
The sending machine (ttenmta*.ttasia.com) is our external ISP that will do the
filtering, SPAM blocking etc. before routing to mailgate2.
Here's an message just finished delivery which the size is 14,789,491 bytes. It
took over an hour to complete the transfer. It is not right.
Patrick
I have tested CRAM-MD5 with both pwcheck_method:saslauthd and
pwcheck_method:auxprop in /etc/sasl2/Sendmail.config
Both work so your assertion about fallback appears to be correct and the
readme is, at best, misleading! Certainly the case when using sendmail. If and
when I switch to
Hi all.
Today this message was delivered to my inbox despite the fact that I've listed
the sender in a check_recipient_access hash map. I can't figure out why:
Return-Path: n...@ilmiolibro.it
Delivered-To: XXX
[...]
From: n...@ilmiolibro.it
To: XXX
Subject: XXX
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013
Fred Ho:
The sending machine (ttenmta*.ttasia.com) is our external ISP that
will do the filtering, SPAM blocking etc. before routing to
mailgate2.
Here's an message just finished delivery which the size is 14,789,491
bytes. It took over an hour to complete the transfer. It is not
right.
I
On 1/15/2013 10:11 AM, Chris wrote:
Hi all.
Today this message was delivered to my inbox despite the fact that I've listed
the sender in a check_recipient_access hash map. I can't figure out why:
Return-Path: n...@ilmiolibro.it
Sender listed.
postconf -n smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Chris:
Hi all.
Today this message was delivered to my inbox despite the fact that I've listed
the sender in a check_recipient_access hash map. I can't figure out why:
Return-Path: n...@ilmiolibro.it
Delivered-To: XXX
You block this sender with smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Why do you
Brian Evans:
On 1/15/2013 10:11 AM, Chris wrote:
Hi all.
Today this message was delivered to my inbox despite the fact that I've
listed
the sender in a check_recipient_access hash map. I can't figure out why:
Return-Path: n...@ilmiolibro.it
Sender listed.
postconf -n
Hi Wietse,
I have already asked the ISP, they said it's not the problem on their side.
It's mailgate2 our receiving side that is slow.The postfix 2.5.6 running in
mailgate2 does not turn on any header_check, body_check checking. Plainly
delivery to the backend.
[root@mailgate2 incoming]# ps
Hi all,
i have a linux box (centos) with postifx working well with exchange, postfix
just relay the mails to the server using sasl authentication.
My problem is that i m not able to do it in a solaris 10 server.
in main.cf:
relayhost = [exchange_IP]
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
Fred Ho:
Hi Wietse,
I have already asked the ISP, they said it's not the problem on
their side.
Of course they will say that.
It's mailgate2 our receiving side that is slow.
Based on what numbers? Your command outputs are unreadable
without line breaks in the proper place.
Wietse
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:35:14PM +0800, Fred Ho wrote:
Hi Wietse,
I have already asked the ISP, they said it's not the problem on
their side. It's mailgate2 our receiving side that is slow.The
postfix 2.5.6 running in mailgate2 does not turn on any header_check,
body_check checking.
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:35:14PM +0800, Fred Ho wrote:
Hi Wietse,
I have already asked the ISP, they said it's not the problem on
their side. It's mailgate2 our receiving side that is slow.The
postfix 2.5.6 running in mailgate2 does not turn on any header_check,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:40:29AM -0800, blast wrote:
i have a linux box (centos) with postifx working well with exchange, postfix
just relay the mails to the server using sasl authentication.
My problem is that i m not able to do it in a solaris 10 server.
in main.cf:
relayhost =
Hi Victor, Wietse,
OK, I have reloaded postfix with the new settings.I will perform the tcpdump to
capture the inbound messages and see.Thanks for all the suggestions.
Regards,Fred
On Wed, 01/16/2013 12:00 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013
i have a linux box (centos) with postifx working well with exchange, postfix
just relay the mails to the server using sasl authentication.
My problem is that i m not able to do it in a solaris 10 server.
in main.cf:
relayhost = [exchange_IP]
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:35:48PM +, carlos jorge wrote:
Make sure you have Berkeley DB support on Solaris, (not just
the obsolete DBM) and hash or btree instead.
Sorry can you help on that?what do i need to install?
No, I have not use Solaris for a while now, sorry. You'll need
Hi all,
perhaps you should have a look at:
http://www.opencsw.org/about/
Kind regards,
Dirk
--
Dirk Jahnke-Zumbusch Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY
IT Information Fabrics Member of the Helmholtz Association
D-22603 HamburgNotkestrasse 85
in smtp_sasl_passwd:
exchange_IP user:pwd
Why not [exchange_IP] (with the enclosing []) for the lookup key.
I can put with that..tried with [] but like it didn't work i
putted like i have in linux, but if you think it is better i can
put [] again.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:18:03PM +, carlos jorge wrote:
but I found a difference:
man postconf -A List the available SASL client plug-in types...
on the working server:
postconf -A
cyrus
on the solaris...
bash-3.00#postconf -A
bash-3.00#
The Solaris server has no (cyrus) SASL
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:53:32PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 01/10/2013 02:05 AM, Jean-Luc Wasmer wrote:
Hi,
I've searched the mailing lists but every time the proposed solution
involves using sender_bcc_maps (or other form of bcc'ing).
The problem with adding a BCC to the incoming
Jean-Luc Wasmer:
One solution that exist is to have the MUA save the email (vis IMAP)
in an Outbox folder that is picked up and processed (sent to the local
SMTP service and move to the local IMAP Sent folder).
Dovecot 2.2 supports this.
I hoped to add support for this to Postfix during the
Le 15/01/2013 01:23, Robert Moskowitz a écrit :
For some users I would like to redirect spam to special addresses.
For example, if I were to get spam (like 500/day) I would like it to
go to rgm-s...@htt-consult.com. My search fu is weak, and I have not
found any guidance on this. To further
39 matches
Mail list logo
